Getting better, and affording it

A Disease-based Comparison of Health Systems: What is best and at what cost?

Measuring the value of health care is a tricky business. Traditional data, for instance, might give the number of hospital beds or doctors per 100,000 inhabitants, but what if some people using health care are getting better while others are not? Or what if they are getting better but at much greater expense than in other countries?

Using costly diagnostic and treatment procedures does not necessarily translate into better health, according to A Disease-based Comparison of Health Systems, a new OECD book that considers various approaches to health care in 17 countries. This book, written by leading experts from OECD countries, including David Cutler from Harvard University and editor of Health Economics, Alan Garber, a Stanford physician and economist, and Bengt Jönsson, a Swedish health economist, assesses treatments for three diseases: ischaemic heart disease, stroke and breast cancer. It compares the costs of medical treatment with patient fatality rates. It is one of the first multi-country studies to analyse expenditure on health care in this way.

The study points out that national health care systems are essentially natural economic experiments, with each country using different financial and delivery arrangements towards a common goal: improving the health of its citizens. It also finds that there is a need to change how comparisons are traditionally made among different national health systems. Instead of merely considering the financial expenses incurred by each country, patients should be followed up after the diagnostic stage to determine whether the money spent on their care was worth it.

After analysing data from a variety of sources, the three-year long project found that insurance-based systems tend to use high levels of expensive technology. Conversely, those public integrated health care systems that exert a stronger control over costs use expensive technologies more sparingly.

A Disease-based Comparison of Health Systems asserts that significant differences in approaches to treatment in OECD countries cannot be reduced to differences in medical knowledge, and thus, affirms the need to adopt more efficient approaches. If we are to ensure that people receive the best possible care, technologically driven or otherwise, modern society will need to consider the implications outlined in this study so that health care delivers value for money, as well as good health.

©OECD Observer No 237, May 2003




Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Read some of the insightful remarks made at OECD Forum 2017, held on 6-7 June. OECD Forum kick-started events with a focus on inclusive growth, digitalisation, and trust, under the overall theme of Bridging Divides.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • How do the largest community of British expats living in Spain feel about Brexit? Britons living in Orihuela Costa, Alicante give their views.
  • Brexit is taking up Europe's energy and focus, according to OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría. Watch video.
  • OECD Chief Economist Catherine Mann and former Bank of England Governor Mervyn King discuss the economic merits of a US border adjustment tax and the outlook for US economic growth.
  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa. blogs.worldbank.org
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2017