Towards more and better jobs

Secretary-General of the OECD

After a decade of rising employment, innovative start-ups and widespread business euphoria, unemployment has started to increase again across the OECD. It seems that the rise in unemployment is less pronounced than was the case in previous bouts of economic weakness, and this reflects encouraging improvements in structural employment. Still, it is a stark reminder that the fight against high and persistent joblessness must remain at the top of the policy agenda.

The deterioration of labour market conditions in the last couple of years could affect some groups more than others, with older workers, women, lone parents, people with disabilities, immigrants and disadvantaged youth bearing the brunt. The trouble is, these groups are already under-represented in employment. Mobilising them into jobs would surely boost employment potential, as well as helping to combat exclusion and poverty. Indeed, several countries have shown they can raise employment by increasing the participation rate of these under-represented groups.

For years, governments have been concerned with fighting unemployment, and though this battle must continue, it must be reinforced by measures to attract more non-employed people into the workforce. After all, higher labour market participation, and not lower unemployment, is the main driver behind employment gains. This is a fact our ageing populations cannot afford to overlook. Population ageing brings pressures on welfare costs and so requires urgent action to boost employment activity. Unless participation rates are increased, population ageing will put a brake on labour force expansion, undermining growth and prosperity. In sum, the returns on fostering greater participation are high.

Reducing non-employment – and not just unemployment – serves social objectives as well as economic ones. Many badly-designed policies that have attempted to reduce unemployment through subsidising the withdrawal of people from the labour market have proved to be counterproductive. Yet, with the right encouragement and assistance, many working-age recipients of social benefits could work. Both they and society would benefit from their greater integration into the labour market.

Non-employment is frequently the result of individual choice. Some parents prefer to take care of their children themselves, for instance. Retirement too can be a household decision: when one partner retires, it is often the case that the other partner withdraws from the labour market, even if this means a loss of income. Clearly, these decisions have to be respected and supported.

But there are barriers to participation also. High minimum wages and regulations setting minimum quality thresholds for jobs have the potential to limit employment opportunities, especially for women, older workers and so on. The tax system may also influence the decision to participate in the labour market, creating inactivity or poverty “traps”. Moreover, public pension systems and early retirement schemes often create strong financial disincentives to remain in employment until the official retirement age.

In other words, far from being a choice, many groups feel the labour market is beyond their reach. Even when these people manage to get a job, this feeling of detachment persists. Women do not receive as much in-work training as men, for instance, and many have difficulty moving up the career ladder.

The importance of job-related training to improve career prospects cannot be emphasised enough. Education reduces the risk of workers falling into low-wage traps and helps them improve their productivity and earnings potential. Still, under-represented groups receive far too little training. This situation must be addressed, as policies that help people move up the career ladder should be part of any medium-term employment strategy.

In short, moving beneficiaries from non-employment benefits into jobs has to be a central goal of employment activation policies. Employment services should maintain close and constructive contact with people looking for work, delivering adequate support and counselling, and working to prevent them from slipping out of the labour market altogether. Many governments could do more with the likes of in-work benefits and tax credits to make work pay. They should reduce employer charges where they can. Access to jobs should also be backed by a variety of services and flexible arrangements to help reconcile work and family life. Workplace reorganisation could take account of the reduced capacity of disabled persons. More flexible retirement schemes could be introduced, together with action to ensure that disincentives to hire or retain older workers are removed.

There are many issues on the table and the meeting of OECD employment and labour ministers on 29-30 September 2003 will consider them in relation to a clear target: “Towards More and Better Jobs”. A difficult question is whether policy should emphasise groups which suffer the greatest labour market disadvantage, such as persons with disabilities, or those offering the largest economic potential, like women and older workers. It is a fine distinction. Neither approach can be ignored, for as employment ministers know, to promote a more inclusive society, we need a more prosperous one as well.

©OECD Observer No 239, September 2003

Economic data


Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • “Nizip” refugee camp visit
    July 2016: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría visits the “Nizip” refugee camp, situated between Gaziantep and the Turkish-Syrian border, accompanied by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek. The camp accommodates a small number of the 2.75 million Syrians currently registered in Turkey, mostly outside the camps. In his tour of the camp, Mr Gurría visits a school, speaks with refugees and gives a short interview.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • Queen Maxima of the Netherlands gives a speech next to Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto (not pictured) during the International Forum of Financial Inclusion at the National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico June 21, 2016.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • OECD Environment Director Simon Upton presented a talk at Imperial College London on 21 April 2016. With the world awash in surplus oil and prices languishing around US$40 per barrel, how can governments step up efforts to transform the world’s energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement?
  • Happy 10th birthday to Twitter. This 2008 OECD Observer interview with Henry Copeland said you’d do well.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Once migrants reach Europe, countries face integration challenge: OECD's Thomas Liebig speaks to NPR's Audie Cornish.

  • Message from the International Space Station to COP21

  • The carbon clock is ticking: OECD’s Gurría on CNBC

  • If we want to reach zero net emissions by the end of the century, we must align our policies for a low-carbon economy, put a price on carbon everywhere, spend less subsidising fossil fuels and invest more in clean energy. OECD at #COP21 – OECD statement for #COP21
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa.
  • Pole to Paris Project
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • How can cities fight climate change?
    Discover projects in Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan and Mexico.
  • Climate: What's changed, what hasn't, what we can do about it.
    Lecture by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, hosted by the London School of Economics and Aviva Investors in association with ClimateWise, London, UK, 3 July 2015.
  • Is technological progress slowing down? Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .

Most Popular Articles


What issue are you most concerned about in 2016?

Euro crisis
International conflict
Global warming

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2016