Solving the e-commerce tax riddle

Retailers should be freed from the burden of collecting tax on web sales
OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration

Burst bubble or not, the digital economy continues to grow, as mainstream businesses move transactions online and e-commerce specialists such as Apple’s Music Store, e-Bay and Amazon thrive. That makes governments keen to collect taxes on online sales.

In particular, they are eyeing major growth in the market for downloaded products, now that broadband is being rolled out. With some companies in the segment reporting a trebling of sales in the last 12 months, governments want to head off the development of a tax-free zone for online sales.

Indeed, the European Union’s new rules on value added tax (VAT) for e-commerce came into force on 1 July 2003. The EU created an online system for businesses based outside the Union to pay taxes on web sales to EU citizens. A host of other countries are likely to follow suit with their own rules.

If they do, businesses will suddenly face a hodgepodge of government tax collection mechanisms. The resulting complexity could overburden firms – especially small and medium-sized ones with limited resources – and stifle the development of cross-border e-commerce.

Collecting tax for online sales is a hard nut to crack, especially when it comes to products such as software and music that can be pulled off the web from anywhere in the world. In 2001, OECD countries agreed that consumption taxes for purchases made online should be paid in the customer’s country of residence, no matter where the retailer is based. If, for instance, a teenager in Hamburg downloads a song from Music City’s server in the US for 99 cents, the company should collect Germany’s 16% VAT and send it to the German tax authorities. But businesses in the US, or anywhere else for that matter, are likely to bridle at the prospect of collecting tax for dozens of countries half a world away.

Is there an easier way? Only if countries break out of their traditional practice, which places the burden of collecting taxes on the retailer, rather than the buyer. To move forward, governments and businesses must collaborate to create a new approach that is simple and cost-effective. Governments must commit to reducing the administrative burden on companies, while the business community should explore innovative, technology-based alternatives to the current system.

One alternative, for instance, might be for traditional payment services with well-established global reach, such as credit card companies, to expand into the new business of collecting and distributing VAT receipts. Another might be for the newer online payment specialists such as e-Bay’s PayPal, which handles online auctions, to step in. Of course, privacy and security issues would need to be addressed so as to protect both consumers’ rights and those of tax administrations.

Such big shifts will not happen overnight. At present the volume of global retail trade in digitised products probably does not warrant the sort of investment that would be required to design, build and operate sophisticated new tax collection systems. But the pressure for change is likely to grow quickly as the economic recovery gains momentum and the market for downloaded products accelerates.

A new system might be adapted for other uses, such as collecting customs duties on the millions of dollars in goods shipped internationally. Rather than the customer getting a nasty shock when the postman turns up with a package and demands US$20 for customs duty (plus a US$5 administration fee for the pleasure of paying), payment would be collected when the order is made. That approach already works successfully for retail trade between Canada and the US.

No matter what the final solution, it is high time for some radical thinking on how governments and business can ensure compliance with tax rules, while at the same time making it easier for retailers to reach across borders. The OECD will be working with business people as well as governments over the coming months to kick-start this brainstorming. Finding solutions will help spur the development of new distribution channels for everything from software to videos, which would be music to most people’s ears – including our teenager in Hamburg.

Reference

Holmes, D., “E-commerce tax: A sober view of cyberspace”, in the OECD Observer No 230, January 2002.

©OECD Observer No 239, September 2003




Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q3 2017 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.3% Dec 2017 annual
Trade: +4.3% exp, +4.3% imp, Q3 2017
Unemployment: 5.5% Dec 2017
Last update: 12 Feb 2018

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Ambassador Aleksander Surdej, Permanent Representative of Poland to the OECD, was a guest on France 24’s English-language show “The Debate”, where he discussed French President Emmanuel Macron’s speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Rousseau
  • Do you trust your government? The OECD’s How's life 2017 report finds that only 38% of people in OECD countries trust their government. How can we improve our old "Social contract?" Read more.
  • Papers show “past coming back to haunt us”: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria tells Sky News that the so-called "Paradise Papers" show a past coming back to haunt us, but one which is now being dismantled. Please watch the video.
  • When someone asks me to describe an ideal girl, in my head, she is a person who is physically and mentally independent, brave to speak her mind, treated with respect just like she treats others, and inspiring to herself and others. But I know that the reality is still so much different. By Alda, 18, on International Day of the Girl. Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Read some of the insightful remarks made at OECD Forum 2017, held on 6-7 June. OECD Forum kick-started events with a focus on inclusive growth, digitalisation, and trust, under the overall theme of Bridging Divides.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2018