Moving beyond Cancún

Supachai Panitchpakdi: “At the very least, we expect to have the negotiations back on track by the beginning of 2004.” ©Hervé Bacquer/OECD

The multilateral trading system is under great strain. But the system is alive and will gain in significance after the setback at Cancún, argues Supachai Panitchpakdi, Director-General of the World Trade Organization.

A great deal of the media coverage of the Cancún ministerial conference focused on the "collapse of the round" and in some more extreme cases "the end of the WTO." Frankly, the reports of our demise have been greatly exaggerated.Without question, the meeting in Cancún was a disappointment. We did not achieve all that we set out to achieve. But it was not the death knell of the Doha Development Agenda, nor has it consigned the WTO to a period of irrelevance or dormancy, as such analysis would lead us to believe.The Cancún meeting was an opportunity for WTO ministers to give political momentum and direction to the Doha Development Agenda to bring it to a timely conclusion by the set deadline of 1 January 2005. It was not intended to be the end of negotiations – a make or break situation – but an important milestone in the process.What we were hoping to achieve was agreement on a text which would serve as a roadmap for the final phase of the negotiations. A text drafted by Mexico’s foreign minister, Luis Ernesto Derbez, who chaired the conference, was put on the table and member governments were in agreement with about three-quarters of that text. The key areas of divergence were, and remain, agriculture, non-agricultural market access, and the so-called Singapore issues of trade and investment, trade and competition, transparency in government procurement and trade facilitation. We tried to bridge the gaps where positions remained apart, though in the end it was not enough, and time ran out.But we saw a lot of flexibility and the overwhelming message I have heard since is of a strong commitment and determination to get the negotiations back on track. APEC ministers meeting in Bangkok in October 2003 reaffirmed their commitment to the process and said work should recommence on the basis of the Derbez text. Many other governments have echoed this call, including African delegations, who have urged everyone to return to the table in a spirit of flexibility and co-operation.This indicates to me that Cancún has served as a wake-up call by provoking some reflection among members about what the world would look like without a strong and dynamic multilateral trading system, indeed, without a successful Doha Development Agenda.While some non-governmental organisations – and even some delegations – briefly celebrated the collapse in Cancún, I can assure you that no one is celebrating now. There is a sharp realisation that failure to restart the talks means that the US$1 billion a day spent on farm subsidies in OECD countries will continue unabated. Foot-dragging in the negotiations means the benefits that would accrue to developing and developed countries alike from liberalisation of trade will remain out of reach. It also means that the trade rules whose revision is needed to ensure their continued relevance in a 21st century economy will remain as they are. The inequities of the trading system that have become apparent will not be addressed.The absence of a commitment to global trade liberalisation would further damage confidence in our already fragile global economy. Global investment flows in 2002 fell for the third consecutive year to US$651 billion – half the peak reached in 2000. Trade flows recovered last year after a dramatic drop in 2001, but they are still well below levels achieved in 2000. Moreover, our economists have recently forecast that trade expansion in 2003 will be little more than 3%, or less than half the annual figures from the 1990s. Failure to make progress in the Doha round means that regional and bilateral arrangements could assume even greater proportions. Regional deals can be helpful if they are open and move forward in tandem with global trade liberalisation. But they are not a substitute. They are, by their very nature, discriminatory. None have really succeeded in opening markets in sensitive areas like agriculture. They add to the complexities of doing business by creating a multiplicity of rules. And the poorest countries tend to get left out in the cold.We may also see a rise in dispute settlement activity. While this is an important signal of confidence in the system, it also indicates that there are disagreements under the new system that need to be worked out.All of this seems to have sunk in with ministers around the world and I am impressed with the statements of support that have emerged from capitals. But it is now time to turn talk into action. At the end of the Cancún meeting, ministers reaffirmed their commitment to the Doha Development Agenda and gave us until 15 December to decide how to move forward. Since then, I have met with roughly 50 ministers and spoken to many more on the telephone. Together with our General Council chairman, Carlos Pérez del Castillo, I have held consultations with Geneva ambassadors on the four issues we believe we must address before and during the meetings which will take place the week of 15 December – agriculture, nonagriculture market access, the Singapore issues and cotton subsidies.Perhaps against the grain of public expectation, these talks have gone well. We are seeking to achieve what we could not achieve in Cancún: a decision on how to proceed with the Singapore issues and cotton, and a framework for continuing negotiations on both agriculture and nonagriculture market access. It's a tall order to be sure, but we need to keep ambition levels high. At the very least, we expect to have the negotiations back on track by the beginning of 2004 with a solid textual basis for future negotiations.The trading system has faced difficulties in the past and no doubt it will face setbacks and difficulties in the future. It is only when we consider what the consequences of not keeping this negotiation on the road might be, that we realise we must go on working to advance the arrangements we have painstakingly built up for over half a century. It is a fight we cannot afford to lose.© OECD Observer No. 240/241, December 2003


Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • “Nizip” refugee camp visit
    July 2016: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría visits the “Nizip” refugee camp, situated between Gaziantep and the Turkish-Syrian border, accompanied by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek. The camp accommodates a small number of the 2.75 million Syrians currently registered in Turkey, mostly outside the camps. In his tour of the camp, Mr Gurría visits a school, speaks with refugees and gives a short interview.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • Queen Maxima of the Netherlands gives a speech next to Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto (not pictured) during the International Forum of Financial Inclusion at the National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico June 21, 2016.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • OECD Environment Director Simon Upton presented a talk at Imperial College London on 21 April 2016. With the world awash in surplus oil and prices languishing around US$40 per barrel, how can governments step up efforts to transform the world’s energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement?
  • Happy 10th birthday to Twitter. This 2008 OECD Observer interview with Henry Copeland said you’d do well.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Once migrants reach Europe, countries face integration challenge: OECD's Thomas Liebig speaks to NPR's Audie Cornish.

  • Message from the International Space Station to COP21

  • COP21 Will Get Agreement With Teeth: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría on Bloomberg

  • The carbon clock is ticking: OECD’s Gurría on CNBC

  • If we want to reach zero net emissions by the end of the century, we must align our policies for a low-carbon economy, put a price on carbon everywhere, spend less subsidising fossil fuels and invest more in clean energy. OECD at #COP21 – OECD statement for #COP21
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa. blogs.worldbank.org
  • Pole to Paris Project
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • How can cities fight climate change?
    Discover projects in Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan and Mexico.
  • Climate: What's changed, what hasn't, what we can do about it.
    Lecture by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, hosted by the London School of Economics and Aviva Investors in association with ClimateWise, London, UK, 3 July 2015.

  • Climate change: “We should not disagree when scientists tell us we have a window of opportunity–10-15 years–to turn this thing around” argues Senator Bernie Sanders.

  • In the long-run, the EU benefits from migration, says OECD Head of International Migration Division Jean-Christophe Dumont.
  • Is technological progress slowing down? Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on www.ft.com.
  • Catherine Mann, OECD Chief Economist, explains on Bloomberg why "too much bank lending can slow economic growth".
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .

Most Popular Articles

Poll

What issue are you most concerned about in 2016?

Unemployment
Euro crisis
International conflict
Global warming
Other

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2016