Globalisation: Preserving the benefits

Anne Krueger: “We do not expect the temporary costs of adapting to a Doha settlement to be significant for the vast majority of countries.” ©Hervé Bacquer/OECD

It is easy to knock globalisation, but it is all too easy to forget the benefits globalisation has brought too. Slipping back into protectionism is not the way forward.

In some circles, these days, it is fashionable to blame globalisation for all manner of ills. Critics hold it responsible for everything from poverty and inequality to environmental pollution.

It is important, of course, to listen to what the critics say. Many of them have genuine misgivings about the spill-over effects of rapid economic progress. Policymakers should make every effort to ensure that these costs – usually short-term – are kept to a minimum.

But it is also important to remember how substantial recent economic progress has been – and how widespread. Globalisation is not new, and nor are most of its consequences. Technological progress has always encountered resistance from those fearful of change and its impact on them. But economic growth in the past 50 years or so has been more rapid than at any point in history. In the 19th century, for instance, countries like Britain, at the forefront of the industrial revolution, managed average annual per capita growth rates of around 1.5%. Contrast that with the per capita annual growth rates of 5-8% that several countries have achieved in the period since the Second World War. The most successful emerging market economies have grown in a decade by as much as countries managed in a hundred years in Victorian times.

Just as it has been for thousands of years, trade has been the main driving force behind this unprecedented economic expansion. Rapidly falling transport and communications costs have helped, of course. But the dismantling of trade barriers that took place after 1945 fuelled economic growth. The multilateral trade system set up first under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and now overseen by the World Trade Organization helped all participating countries reap the benefits of free, or freer, trade. We must not lose sight of the role that trade liberalisation has played in creating the gains in economic welfare from which so many people have benefited.

The industrial countries have done well in the past half century. But so too have many people in the developing world. A large proportion of the world’s population has become better off at a faster pace than ever before. Infant mortality has declined sharply; literacy rates have risen to more than 70%. World poverty has declined – in the five years after 1993, for example, the number of people living on less than US$1 a day fell by more than 100 million. Life expectancy in developing countries is now around 65 years, only about 10 years less than in the industrial countries. Economic growth has also raised the demand for democracy and representation. A large part of the world’s population now lives under elected governments.

Recognising the gains is essential if we are to preserve them. History shows us that progress can be halted, and even reversed. The problems faced by the international economy after the First World War are a sharp reminder of how dangerous a retreat into protectionism can be – and how widespread its impact. Governments need constantly to remind themselves that it is not enough to pay lip service to the principles of free trade. Preserving the multilateral trading system, and dismantling trade barriers, must remain at the forefront of economic policy if the gains from globalisation are to be preserved.

Many people forget, or overlook, the International Monetary Fund’s role in promoting world trade. That is understandable. The general assumption is that the IMF exists to prevent or resolve international financial crises – and it does. But that task is a means to an end. The Fund’s Articles of Agreement charge it with facilitating “the expansion and balanced growth of world trade”.

It is not the IMF’s job to oversee the world trading system – that task falls to the WTO. But the IMF can help countries develop the sustainable macroeconomic framework, including monetary, fiscal and exchange rate policy, which they need to benefit fully from participation in the world economy.

New initiative

The IMF has also recently launched a new initiative, aimed at providing support for countries that may face short-term balance-of-payments difficulties as they adapt to the further trade liberalisation that we hope will eventually be agreed under the Doha round. Based on what we know from past trade liberalisations, and the IMF’s own preliminary research, we do not expect the temporary costs of adapting to a Doha settlement to be significant for the vast majority of countries. But by standing ready to provide support in those cases where it might be needed, the IMF is providing a kind of contingent insurance, so that no country feels unable to commit to further trade liberalisation.

By helping to underpin the process of trade liberalisation in this way and by helping governments take the necessary action to maintain financial stability, to pre-empt crises or, in some cases, to resolve them, the IMF is also helping them exploit the opportunities offered by globalisation.

Of course, crisis resolution is an important element of the Fund’s work – it certainly has the highest profile. But increasingly the Fund has sought to help governments put in place the sort of framework that both reduces the risk of crisis and better equips them for those occasions when trouble strikes. Such assistance extends far beyond the traditional domain of macroeconomic policy. Institutional reform, financial market reform and technical assistance across a whole range of issues – these all form part of the IMF’s day-to-day work with governments. The IMF is also active in helping low-income countries to develop pro-poor growth policies, again aimed at helping countries and their populations reap the maximum benefits from globalisation.

Efficient markets, at the national and international level, are key to delivering the conditions for the stability that governments, firms and individuals cherish. Economic sustainability is at the heart of the IMF’s work. But it is – or should be – everybody’s aim.

©OECD Observer No 240/241, December 2003




Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • “Nizip” refugee camp visit
    July 2016: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría visits the “Nizip” refugee camp, situated between Gaziantep and the Turkish-Syrian border, accompanied by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek. The camp accommodates a small number of the 2.75 million Syrians currently registered in Turkey, mostly outside the camps. In his tour of the camp, Mr Gurría visits a school, speaks with refugees and gives a short interview.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • Queen Maxima of the Netherlands gives a speech next to Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto (not pictured) during the International Forum of Financial Inclusion at the National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico June 21, 2016.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • OECD Environment Director Simon Upton presented a talk at Imperial College London on 21 April 2016. With the world awash in surplus oil and prices languishing around US$40 per barrel, how can governments step up efforts to transform the world’s energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement?
  • Happy 10th birthday to Twitter. This 2008 OECD Observer interview with Henry Copeland said you’d do well.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Once migrants reach Europe, countries face integration challenge: OECD's Thomas Liebig speaks to NPR's Audie Cornish.

  • Message from the International Space Station to COP21

  • The carbon clock is ticking: OECD’s Gurría on CNBC

  • If we want to reach zero net emissions by the end of the century, we must align our policies for a low-carbon economy, put a price on carbon everywhere, spend less subsidising fossil fuels and invest more in clean energy. OECD at #COP21 – OECD statement for #COP21
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa. blogs.worldbank.org
  • Pole to Paris Project
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • How can cities fight climate change?
    Discover projects in Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan and Mexico.
  • Climate: What's changed, what hasn't, what we can do about it.
    Lecture by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, hosted by the London School of Economics and Aviva Investors in association with ClimateWise, London, UK, 3 July 2015.
  • Is technological progress slowing down? Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on www.ft.com.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .

Most Popular Articles

Poll

What issue are you most concerned about in 2016?

Unemployment
Euro crisis
International conflict
Global warming
Other

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2016