Counting on numbers

OECD Observer

Click to enlarge.

Who would question the value of numbers? They can add credibility to an argument, clinch a deal, or simply illuminate an issue. But they can also deceive, through misreading or even manipulation. Can we really rely on the statistics we read? In the build-up to a major international forum on “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy”, to be held 10-13 November in Palermo, Italy, we asked Enrico Giovannini, the OECD's chief statistician, for an “unofficial” view.

OECD Observer: The public and the media in Europe often complain about official data, for instance, that prices appear to be rising faster than government figures show. How would you explain this gap between public perceptions and official data?

Enrico Giovannini: This is an old story. Ten years ago, the Boskin Report showed that the consumer price index (CPI) in the US was overestimating inflation, and urged statisticians to improve their methods. Now, consumers living in euro-area countries believe that today’s inflation figures underestimate reality.

If you compare the “official” inflation with the so-called “perceived” inflation rate measured by opinion surveys, you will see two well-aligned curves until 2002, when the euro came in. But after that, the curve for perceived inflation rises more steeply than the official one. Now, is it possible that a system based on collecting hundreds of thousands of individual prices for each country and that is scrutinised by the IMF, Eurostat and the OECD could fail, while the experience of shoppers buying what is probably a limited range of goods and services, and probably bought in one city, provide a truer picture? My answer is no.

If we exclude the existence of an international organisation conspiracy, the only possible explanation for the difference regarding the euro is that consumers must confuse changes in prices between different goods with the average level of prices generally. In other words, just because a weekly shopping basket of food seems more costly does not mean there has been a rise in the overall price level, which may include furniture, computers and so on. With the introduction of the euro, some prices, especially of some frequently bought items, rose more sharply than others. This made it more difficult to assign correct values to the new notes and coins.

According to some news reports, households faced unusual liquidity constraints before the end of each month and naturally they blame inflation. But how many of them accept that they might simply have spent more than usual because of the switchover? It is not easy to understand prices in a new currency, and overspending is a risk.

If there was collusion, it was in the media, which delighted in exaggerating the incidence of “local” price jumps. In herd-like fashion, this added further price pressure, even among those producers who had avoided raising their prices in the first place.

But could the experts be getting it wrong? For instance, couldn't a price index place more weight on bread and banking charges, and less on the falling cost of technology?

EG: For a start, if anyone dislikes unreliable statistics, it’s the statisticians themselves. It’s in our nature to want to improve them. After the criticisms made by the Boskin Report regarding the US price index, all countries began to update the weight structure of their indexes. In 1998, when I was Director for Economic Statistics at the Italian Statistical Institute, we decided to update them yearly, for instance.

On the other hand, there are some differences in household spending, depending on income level, sociodemographic conditions, etc, but they are not large enough to explain wide differences in overall inflation rates. In some countries, consumer associations have estimated a “true” inflation at 3 or 4 times higher than the official rate. But there is no way of obtaining such results using reasonable weight structures. Also, what would be the aim of measuring separate inflation rates for 10 or 20 categories of households? Such an approach could be useful to analyse the impact of the euro on income distribution, but they cannot be used separately to disprove the overall inflation rate.

But the real clinching point is this: let’s imagine actual inflation had been three or four times higher than the officially published rate. In that case, households’ disposable income in real terms would have plummeted, hurting consumption, employment, and so on. Euro-area countries might have tipped into a serious recession! This did not happen. Overall, it seems that official figures are broadly correct.

You are hosting a major international forum on statistics, to be held in Palermo, Italy in November. What do you expect this conference to achieve?

EG: We see the forum as a unique opportunity to bring statistics to the centre of national policy debates, by adding an international perspective. We live in an information-rich world, and there is a real risk of confusion. Do we really know whether society as a whole is improving or declining? My hope is that by identifying some key indicators to assess country performances, taking into account economic, social and environmental aspects, we can find clear answers. And we can then use those indicators to build a true knowledge base for better action.

The selection of any credible “key indicators” must involve society broadly – academics, NGOs, business and the media, and so on. Statistical offices will gather the data and communicate them regularly. Technical and policy questions, best practices, useful initiatives: all these issues will feature at the Forum. We expect results. After all, more than 150 world-class speakers from 30 countries and 12 international organisations will be present. As George Washington said in 1790: “Knowledge is in every country the surest basis of public happiness”. Reliable statistics can help us build such knowledge. This is what the Forum is about.


Giovannini, Enrico (2003), "Damned lies and statistics: Helping numbers make sense", in OECD Observer No 237, May 2004. Available here

©OECD Observer, No 244 September 2004

Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q1 2019 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.3% May 2019 annual
Trade: +0.4% exp, -1.2% imp, Q1 2019
Unemployment: 5.2% July 2019
Last update: 8 July 2019

OECD Observer Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Subscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To order your own paper editions,email

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • MCM logo
  • The following communiqué and Chair’s statement were issued at the close of the OECD Council Meeting at Ministerial level, this year presided by the Slovak Republic.
  • Food production will suffer some of the most immediate and brutal effects of climate change, with some regions of the world suffering far more than others. Only through unhindered global trade can we ensure that high-quality, nutritious food reaches those who need it most, Angel Gurría, Secretary-General of the OECD, and José Graziano da Silva, Director-General of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, write in their latest Project Syndicate article. Read the article here.
  • Globalisation will continue and get stronger, and how to harness it is the great challenge, says OECD Secretary-General Gurría on Bloomberg TV. Watch the interview here.
  • OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría with UN Secretary-General António Guterres at the 73rd Session of the UN General Assembly, in New York City.
  • The new OECD Observer Crossword, with Myles Mellor. Try it online!
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2019