Euro: Less robust than you think

OECD Observer

Future of the euro 

Letter to the editor: Sir, Vincent Koen pronounces the euro to be a success, and argues that economic fundamentals suggest that the euro will appreciate against the US dollar over the longer term. I believe that such an assessment is premature: while the euro may appreciate in the medium term, its longer-term prospects look less robust.

It is necessary to be honest about what economic and monetary union is. It may sound and look like an economic accord, but in reality it is at first a political deal – from the premises of its inception to the discounting of the Maastricht criteria in 1998. EMU has merely glossed over the fault lines (of which I think five are significant) between the participating economies. While some of these – such as the pace of deregulation – are problems for the European Union in general, I would argue that the real risks to the euro arise from the differences among the countries. In the face of electoral pressures, national governments will seek accommodations. Instead of promoting greater intra-EU competitive pressures, the euro may foster more political interference with economic affairs, undermining the European Union’s long-term growth prospects.

The first of the fault lines is the asynchronous business cycles. The second fault line is the transmission of monetary policy, which acts on different lags and with varying impact on output on the national economies. Taken together, these two points suggest that while the ECB may be able to set an optimal monetary stance in the aggregate, monetary policy may be inappropriate for individual countries. Countries feeling excessively squeezed may demand a loosening of policy, leading to an inflationary bias for the euro area as a whole, and a risk that some of the more dynamic economies could over-heat. The third schism is the labour market: without a flexible exchange rate to mask trends in real wage differentials, but with continued labour market rigidities, unemployment may prove to be the mechanism that brings unit labour costs into greater alignment in the euro area. This could translate into legislation to protect jobs – jeopardising future employment growth.

The fourth potential problem is the pace of regulatory reform, much of which is determined in Brussels. While it is true that the EU is engaged in a process of liberalisation, so is the rest of the world. As the cliché goes, in the old economy, size was important, but in the new economy, speed counts. Those who reform more rapidly will be frustrated as the more lethargic countries hold up the pace of liberalisation at the EU level. Finally, there are longterm fiscal imbalances, notably the generational imbalances caused by an ageing population and expensive pension commitments, which could undermine the EU-wide commitment to fiscal prudence.

The dynamics of EMU will undoubtedly make the euro area a more homogeneous economic unit, and I do not think EMU will collapse. The risk to the euro is that competing national interests will render the euro area an unattractive business environment, and capital will flow out to seek better rates of return. The euro was designed to replace the Deutschemark, with the hope that it would replicate that currency’s postwar success. It may end up looking more like the British pound, with periods of strength unable to mask a longer term weakness.

MARK FEIGE, Washington DC

©OECD Observer No 221/222, Summer 2000 (Forum edition)




Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q2 2018 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.9% Sept 2018 annual
Trade: +2.7% exp, +3.0% imp, Q4 2017
Unemployment: 5.2% Sept 2018
Last update: 13 Nov 2018

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Globalisation will continue and get stronger, and how to harness it is the great challenge, says OECD Secretary-General Gurría on Bloomberg TV. Watch the interview here.
  • OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría with UN Secretary-General António Guterres at the 73rd Session of the UN General Assembly, in New York City.
  • The new OECD Observer Crossword, with Myles Mellor. Try it online!
  • Watch the webcast of the final press conference of the OECD annual ministerial meeting 2018.
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Rousseau
  • Do you trust your government? The OECD’s How's life 2017 report finds that only 38% of people in OECD countries trust their government. How can we improve our old "Social contract?" Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2018