Africa: Farming sense

Investing in African agriculture would help poor people to help themselves. The World Bank forecasts that in Africa and the Middle East, the number of “absolute poor” will increase between now and 2015. Nearly 80% of these people live in rural areas. Their options to improve livelihoods are largely restricted to agriculture.

To prevent this from turning into disaster, development aid in sub-Saharan Africa must focus on the rural areas, exploring innovative ways to raise the productivity of poor people’s natural resources and, as a result, generate broad-based, pro-poor economic growth. This may sound like an old story to some, especially those that remember the Green Revolution, but in the noisy debate about issues like corruption, investment and health, it is a basic truth that is all too easily overlooked.

Yes, there are other policy options, such as mineral extraction and tourism, or institution building, which will all contribute towards economic growth as well as generating much-needed foreign exchange and stability. But their impact on actual poverty reduction is limited and rarely manages to improve the livelihoods of the majority of poor people.

Productivity on African farms must be increased. There are some success stories but, on the whole, the situation is bleak. In the past 30 years, Africa has turned from being a food exporter to a net food importer. Crop yields are no higher today than they were in 1980. Africa’s share of world agricultural trade fell from 8% in 1965 to 2.5% in 2004. The main issue facing national governments and multilateral and bilateral donors is essentially how best to achieve significant increases in agricultural productivity. Direct budget support (DBS) is becoming an increasingly popular tool to support developing countries. But is this instrument able to nurture the kinds of new thinking so crucial to revitalising the agricultural sector? The answer is: probably no.

Africa’s small-scale farmers and herders need improved technical agricultural support services, access to a range of input and output markets, improved crop varieties, better storage and distribution facilities and livestock improvement, but realising these changes has proved to be problematic. So how should donors invest their money?

The option of supporting sometimes corrupt, often inept, ministries of agriculture, whose past and current record in this field is weak, looks unpromising. However, devising a private sector/community-based model to provide a range of agricultural support services, such as credit, seeds, fertilizers and veterinary drugs, needs to be piloted and this will not be realised without technical and financial support from donors.

But under the unimaginative DBS funding framework, can innovation of this kind avoid being blunted by bureaucrats, so adept at mismanaging their own resources? The fact is, there is a link between the decline in investment specifically in agriculture and a decline in performance of the sector. There are other contributing factors, but direct budget support has not helped the cause of farmers.

In contrast, local initiatives can work. Consider the case of Ugandan widow Nanyoni Sharifa. At 44, she is just one example of someone whose life has changed beyond recognition, because money was invested locally. Ms Sharifa is a cassava grower who has seen yields fall from eight tonnes to one tonne per acre since the early 1990s as a result of the cassava mosaic virus.

Two years ago she joined the farmers association in Nakasongola, which had just won a $57,000 grant from the Maendeleo Agricultural Technology Fund to test out new varieties of cassava.

They set to work on farmer field trials, and hit on two or three varieties that were particularly productive. Surplus yields for the 500 farmers led them to chip, dry and grind cassava to produce flour for bread, biscuits, doughnuts and cement!

The project so impressed the Japanese International Cooperation Agency, an official government body, that it has just invested $40,000 into a processing plant close to the village. Now Nanyoni Sharifa is a member of the executive committee, motivating villagers to grow cassava to supply the plant.

“Before the project, there was often famine because of the diseased cassava plants but now everyone has enough food. We can also afford to pay for secondary school fees and medical bills,” she said.

True, the project is small-scale, but it illustrates a key point in the debate about development–the need to transfer knowledge and expertise where it is needed most: in the rural areas where most people in Africa live.

The Maendeleo Agricultural Technology Fund, set up by the Gatsby Charitable Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, is managed by FARM-Africa and has an annual budget of nearly $2 million to make agricultural technologies accessible to farmers in east Africa. It is a pioneering model achieving quantifiable success, but there is an urgent need for more of this type of funding to develop the work further.

Invest at the grass roots in existing activities and growth will follow–only then will we stem the tide of rural migrants flooding into urban slums, and bring about equity and social justice so deserved by the rural poor. And only then will the over-reliance on food aid and unreliable government budgets be halted.

Everyone in poverty relief cites the fact that over a billion people live on less than a dollar a day. But while debates about trade reform are pertinent, they tend to focus on African elites. They end up ignoring the vast majority of people who live on less than a dollar a day and beyond the reach of services and infrastructure.

By all means support African governments to change and develop, but industrial nations need to balance that by offering real support to community-based organisations on the ground, too. It is only then that progress can be made. Work with what people have and help them to help themselves.

*Dr Christie Peacock is the Chief Executive of FARM-Africa, an international NGO working with farmers and herders in eastern and southern Africa. It aims to make a lasting difference to peoples’ lives by providing practical help, enabling them to produce more food for their families.

References

Conway, Gordon (1999), The Doubly Green Revolution: Food for All in the 21st Century, Cornell University Press, New York.

©OECD Observer No 249, May 2005




Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • “Nizip” refugee camp visit
    July 2016: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría visits the “Nizip” refugee camp, situated between Gaziantep and the Turkish-Syrian border, accompanied by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek. The camp accommodates a small number of the 2.75 million Syrians currently registered in Turkey, mostly outside the camps. In his tour of the camp, Mr Gurría visits a school, speaks with refugees and gives a short interview.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • Queen Maxima of the Netherlands gives a speech next to Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto (not pictured) during the International Forum of Financial Inclusion at the National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico June 21, 2016.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • OECD Environment Director Simon Upton presented a talk at Imperial College London on 21 April 2016. With the world awash in surplus oil and prices languishing around US$40 per barrel, how can governments step up efforts to transform the world’s energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement?
  • Happy 10th birthday to Twitter. This 2008 OECD Observer interview with Henry Copeland said you’d do well.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Once migrants reach Europe, countries face integration challenge: OECD's Thomas Liebig speaks to NPR's Audie Cornish.

  • Message from the International Space Station to COP21

  • COP21 Will Get Agreement With Teeth: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría on Bloomberg

  • The carbon clock is ticking: OECD’s Gurría on CNBC

  • If we want to reach zero net emissions by the end of the century, we must align our policies for a low-carbon economy, put a price on carbon everywhere, spend less subsidising fossil fuels and invest more in clean energy. OECD at #COP21 – OECD statement for #COP21
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa. blogs.worldbank.org
  • Pole to Paris Project
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • How can cities fight climate change?
    Discover projects in Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan and Mexico.
  • Climate: What's changed, what hasn't, what we can do about it.
    Lecture by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, hosted by the London School of Economics and Aviva Investors in association with ClimateWise, London, UK, 3 July 2015.

  • Climate change: “We should not disagree when scientists tell us we have a window of opportunity–10-15 years–to turn this thing around” argues Senator Bernie Sanders.

  • In the long-run, the EU benefits from migration, says OECD Head of International Migration Division Jean-Christophe Dumont.
  • Is technological progress slowing down? Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on www.ft.com.
  • Catherine Mann, OECD Chief Economist, explains on Bloomberg why "too much bank lending can slow economic growth".
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .

Most Popular Articles

Poll

What issue are you most concerned about in 2016?

Unemployment
Euro crisis
International conflict
Global warming
Other

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2016