Cruising ahead

OECD Observer

Port cities can benefit from leisure cruises to boost their economies, while at the same time avoiding pitfalls and safeguarding the environment.

Ports used to go hand in hand with heavy industry, and over recent decades many suffered the same fate. Rusting cranes stood silent at the dockside, the city’s population aged and its young folk drifted away.

But now some of the more go-ahead port cities are looking to the booming tourism industry, leisure cruises in particular, for new life and economic renewal. Diversification has become the buzz word on everyone’s lips.

Cruising is one of the fastest growing sectors of tourism. Nearly 9 million passengers from America and three million from Europe took cruises in 2004. According to the Passenger Shipping Association, this figure was over 5% up on 2003. Britons, the most avid cruisers, passed the 1 million mark for the first time in 2004, followed by the Germans, Italians and Spanish. The industry is also booming in Asia and Australia.

Since the 1990s, the cruise industry has become highly concentrated, with the world market dominated by a handful of large players, such as Carnival Corporation, P&O Princess Cruises and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. Ports compete hard to attract operators like these. The operators then exploit their economic clout to drive a hard bargain with receiving ports and agencies.

This is hardly surprising since the economic impact on local economies can be considerable. Cruise lines spend money. They order new ships, some of which can be formidable in size. Currently, the largest passenger liner, weighing in at 150,000 tons, is the Queen Mary 2. Built at the French port of Saint Nazaire and owned by Carnival, it cost more than $1 billion to construct. Royal Caribbean is planning another even larger liner, Ultra Voyager, for 2008. Decking out and furnishing these liners is a business in itself. Also, cruise ships generate local employment in the ports where they berth. And their passengers and crews are potential spenders.

Port cities have traditionally provided cruise line companies with considerable incentives to attract their customers. In 2001 Panama offered $12 to cruise ships for every passenger landed, and San Juan reimbursed a portion of port charges to cruise lines in return for investment in the cruise terminal. Many ports have expanded piers and terminals, and they spend millions of dollars in great expectation that cruise ships will generate useful income. Maintenance costs are also high. In 2003, the US city of Portland, Maine, earmarked $1.2 million in waterfront renovations and improvements because of wear and tear caused by visiting cruise ships.

According to a recent OECD territorial review on the Korean port of Busan, cruises hold potential benefits for ports, but they have to be properly managed and planned. Busan is Korea’s second largest city and a major shipbuilding port, yet it still faces competition not just from abroad, but from expanding Korean ports like Gwangyang. The OECD review suggests that Busan can exploit the potential of the cruising industry, but it also offers some realistic advice to help the city keep its feet on firm land.

One step is to enhance on-shore amenities to capture any spillovers from the cruise industry. While the economic impact of cruise lines on hosting ports remains undoubted, the report warns that income expectations have sometimes proved to be overstated. Ports have to compete with the cruise lines themselves, which promote their own onboard shops and services, such as bars and restaurants, casinos, even phone and internet services and so on.

Moreover, cruise lines have been reported to sell excursions to passengers at a higher price than the price paid to on-shore merchants (as much as three times higher), and this reduces the economic benefits of the cruise industry for local businesses. Competing by enhancing on-shore amenities and stepping up arrangements with cruise lines can help those local businesses to reap the full rewards.

While large cruise companies can drive a hard bargain, so too can the ports. After all, the cruisers need them. But competing ports can unwittingly undercut each other, so the report recommends developing co-operation among hosting ports and among port merchants. By standing together they can defeat efforts by cruising companies to drive prices down artificially. For instance, Busan and its neighbouring ports could agree on minimum prices for shore excursions, the OECD territorial review suggests. In this way each port can avoid being played off too much against the others.

At the same time, cruise ships are not all good news, and their environmental effects in particular are a growing concern. One US-based civil society group, Bluewater, describes cruise ships, which can carry as much as 5,000 passengers and crew, as “floating cities” producing large volumes of waste: “A typical cruise ship on a one-week voyage generates more than 50 tons of garbage, one million gallons of graywater (waste water from sinks, showers, galleys and laundry facilities), 210,000 gallons of sewage, and 35,000 gallons of oil-contaminated water. Most of this waste is dumped directly into the ocean, some treated, some not.”

According to the OECD’s Busan review, ports often overlook the environmental costs (and therefore the consequential economic costs) incurred in hosting cruise ships, such as waste cleanup, or wear and tear on port infrastructure. The report says that Busan should make sure that “no-discharge” zones are designated around and within its harbours, that clear standards are set for cruise ship discharges to the air and the water, and that a monitoring system is established to ensure compliance with these standards.

Reference

OECD (2005), OECD Territorial Review: Busan, Korea, available at www.oecdbookshop.org.

©OECD Observer No 250, July 2005




Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • “Nizip” refugee camp visit
    July 2016: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría visits the “Nizip” refugee camp, situated between Gaziantep and the Turkish-Syrian border, accompanied by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek. The camp accommodates a small number of the 2.75 million Syrians currently registered in Turkey, mostly outside the camps. In his tour of the camp, Mr Gurría visits a school, speaks with refugees and gives a short interview.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • Queen Maxima of the Netherlands gives a speech next to Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto (not pictured) during the International Forum of Financial Inclusion at the National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico June 21, 2016.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • OECD Environment Director Simon Upton presented a talk at Imperial College London on 21 April 2016. With the world awash in surplus oil and prices languishing around US$40 per barrel, how can governments step up efforts to transform the world’s energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement?
  • Happy 10th birthday to Twitter. This 2008 OECD Observer interview with Henry Copeland said you’d do well.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Once migrants reach Europe, countries face integration challenge: OECD's Thomas Liebig speaks to NPR's Audie Cornish.

  • Message from the International Space Station to COP21

  • COP21 Will Get Agreement With Teeth: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría on Bloomberg

  • The carbon clock is ticking: OECD’s Gurría on CNBC

  • If we want to reach zero net emissions by the end of the century, we must align our policies for a low-carbon economy, put a price on carbon everywhere, spend less subsidising fossil fuels and invest more in clean energy. OECD at #COP21 – OECD statement for #COP21
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa. blogs.worldbank.org
  • Pole to Paris Project
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • How can cities fight climate change?
    Discover projects in Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan and Mexico.
  • Climate: What's changed, what hasn't, what we can do about it.
    Lecture by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, hosted by the London School of Economics and Aviva Investors in association with ClimateWise, London, UK, 3 July 2015.

  • Climate change: “We should not disagree when scientists tell us we have a window of opportunity–10-15 years–to turn this thing around” argues Senator Bernie Sanders.

  • In the long-run, the EU benefits from migration, says OECD Head of International Migration Division Jean-Christophe Dumont.
  • Is technological progress slowing down? Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on www.ft.com.
  • Catherine Mann, OECD Chief Economist, explains on Bloomberg why "too much bank lending can slow economic growth".
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .

Most Popular Articles

Poll

What issue are you most concerned about in 2016?

Unemployment
Euro crisis
International conflict
Global warming
Other

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2016