Measures of reform

OECD Observer

Click to enlarge.

OECD countries have carried out many public management reforms over the last 20 years or so. Yet there is still little comparative data to help governments plan such moves and gauge their progress. To be sure, statistical and budgetary agencies in many OECD countries have made attempts at measuring general government productivity, for instance, but these efforts have tended to be made in isolation, and often employing different methods.

Also, reforms are characteristically inspired by assumptions about “best practices” that are rarely spelled out clearly, making it very difficult for officials in any given country to evaluate changes introduced either by their predecessors or governments elsewhere.

OECD countries have their own individual tastes and needs when it comes to reform, but all face common challenges, such as how to introduce accountability, retain senior staff, improve efficiency and sharpen their bookkeeping. But while decision-makers may have a clear idea of what they want to achieve, the difficulty is knowing where to start, and then how to monitor and influence performance effectively.

A new project by the OECD’s Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate may help to respond to this need. Provisionally dubbed “Management in Government: Comparative Country Data”, it aims to bring together information and experience from across the OECD on good government and efficient public services.

The project is still at proposal stage but, if adopted, it would help governments to bring a sharper focus to public management discussions and reform. All levels of government–central/federal, state and local–could be covered by the project, which would lead to an annual report entitled Government at a Glance, starting in 2009. The study could also examine key sectors such as education, health care, law and order, and public administration.

Assembling the data is the tricky part. An initial working paper in 2006 would relate mainly to inputs, using data which are readily available on areas such as operating costs, human resources and institutions, budget processes, nature of the civil service, structure of government, intergovernmental relations and transparency.

Another part of the work would concern so-called outputs and results, including measurements of volume–nature, number and scope of public services–and quality, for example, processing time, customer/citizen relations and accessibility. Though this is a vital aspect of the study, experts working on the project concede that information of this sort will be more difficult to obtain.

The new project will depend on collaboration with outside agencies and experts, such as national statistical offices, analysts and statistical practitioners. This will enhance its appeal to a range of audiences, from public managers and policymakers to national accountants. All of those envisaging reform or wishing to assess performance, whether in outsourcing auditing or training schemes for senior managers, will be able to see in a glance how other governments have done.

The project cannot, of course, provide simple catch-all solutions for governments considering public management reforms. After all, the dividing lines between public and private sector differ from one country to another, and the relationships are complex in nature. Health services may be publicly funded but provided by private agencies, for instance. What the study can do, however, is provide a solid fact-based starting point for action. And if the project can help governments learn from the by now rich and rapidly accumulating experience of others, then it too will be a success.

For more information, contact

©OECD Observer No 252/253, November 2005

Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q1 2019 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.3% May 2019 annual
Trade: +0.4% exp, -1.2% imp, Q1 2019
Unemployment: 5.2% July 2019
Last update: 8 July 2019

OECD Observer Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Subscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To order your own paper editions,email

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • MCM logo
  • The following communiqué and Chair’s statement were issued at the close of the OECD Council Meeting at Ministerial level, this year presided by the Slovak Republic.
  • Food production will suffer some of the most immediate and brutal effects of climate change, with some regions of the world suffering far more than others. Only through unhindered global trade can we ensure that high-quality, nutritious food reaches those who need it most, Angel Gurría, Secretary-General of the OECD, and José Graziano da Silva, Director-General of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, write in their latest Project Syndicate article. Read the article here.
  • Globalisation will continue and get stronger, and how to harness it is the great challenge, says OECD Secretary-General Gurría on Bloomberg TV. Watch the interview here.
  • OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría with UN Secretary-General António Guterres at the 73rd Session of the UN General Assembly, in New York City.
  • The new OECD Observer Crossword, with Myles Mellor. Try it online!
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2019