Aid flow

Click to enlarge.

The downward trend in aid to water supply and sanitation has been reversed. Or has it?

Three years ago, before the 3rd World Water Forum in Kyoto, we wrote that while the Millennium Development Goal of halving the population without access to safe drinking water by 2015 was feasible, it would be a tall order, particularly against a background in which bilateral development aid from OECD countries had stabilised or fallen. Have matters improved as we move closer to the deadline? There are some encouraging signs, but probably not where it matters most.

Some of the difficulties with water aid have been outlined before, notably at a seminar called “Water for the Poorest”, held during the Stockholm World Water Week in August 2004. For a start, water supply and sanitation had not been incorporated in the UN’s poverty reduction strategies, and could therefore not attract financing through this mechanism. Another problem was a lack of viable projects, mainly because water projects were generally considered as risky, causing reluctance among programme managers in donor agencies, accountable for their portfolios. Furthermore, funding of projects in countries most in need had been constrained as aid was conditional on governance reforms. Aid had been targeted, not to the poorest communities where the water needs were greatest, the Stockholm seminar heard, but rather to areas where the criteria for donor success were in place.

The latest data from the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the OECD tend to reflect this pattern. There is some positive news, insofar as these data show a sharp increase in the allocation of Official Development Assistance (ODA) to water supply and sanitation in 2004. DAC members’ bilateral ODA commitments to the water sector amounted to US$3 billion that year. Multilateral donors’ commitments also increased, with a total of US$1.8 billion in 2004, reversing the downward trend since the middle of the 1990s (see graph).

A closer look at the trend in aid to the water sector shows that allocations are in fact set by a handful of large donors and are targeted at a relatively small number of countries. As much as three quarters of total bilateral aid to water supply and sanitation in 2000-04 was extended by Japan, Germany, the United States, France and the Netherlands (see table). More than half of those allocations were directed to Asia. The share of recipients in Sub-Saharan Africa was just 15%, a modest increase at best over the last few years.

An even closer look at the trend reveals that much of the 2004 increase in aid is largely explained by the US programme of reconstruction in Iraq. In 2003 Japan reported large new commitments to China, Vietnam, FYROM (Macedonia) and Kazakhstan.

Nor is there any sign that donors have been stepping up their efforts for water compared with other sectors. In fact, the share of aid to water supply and sanitation in DAC members’ total sector-allocable ODA dropped from 9% in 1999-2000 to 6% in 2001-02, where it remained in 2003-04.

Still, every drop counts and, in fairness, DAC members’ bilateral ODA disbursements to water supply and sanitation have increased slightly, from US$1.9 billion in 2003 to US$2.2 billion in 2004. On the other hand, over a half of these amounts relate to projects committed before 2000. The main recipients include many of the countries listed in the table, as well as Egypt, Turkey and the Philippines. There, large infrastructure projects started in the second half of the 1990s are still ongoing. They have not received any notable new commitments since then.

But there is a final note which policymakers must take seriously. In the water sector, most aid is used to finance investments in infrastructure. Projects are large and on average take at least eight years to implement. That is a long lead time, particularly as the deadline for the MDG on water has been set for nine years from now. Any strategy and possible reorientation of aid to water supply and sanitation to reach the Millennium Development Goal on water must take this urgently into account.


Benn, Julia (2003), “Water aid and development: Improving the flow”, in the OECD Observer No. 236, March 2003, available at


Note: The statistics of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the OECD, whose members account for some 90% of global bilateral aid, are available in the International Development Statistics online database ( They provide for detailed analyses of aid for water by donor and by recipient. Advice on statistical methods and terminology and practical guidance for searching the data can be found in the User’s Guide ( The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the DAC members.

©OECD Observer No 254, March 2006

Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q1 2019 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.3% May 2019 annual
Trade: +0.4% exp, -1.2% imp, Q1 2019
Unemployment: 5.2% July 2019
Last update: 8 July 2019

OECD Observer Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Subscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To order your own paper editions,email

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • MCM logo
  • The following communiqué and Chair’s statement were issued at the close of the OECD Council Meeting at Ministerial level, this year presided by the Slovak Republic.
  • Food production will suffer some of the most immediate and brutal effects of climate change, with some regions of the world suffering far more than others. Only through unhindered global trade can we ensure that high-quality, nutritious food reaches those who need it most, Angel Gurría, Secretary-General of the OECD, and José Graziano da Silva, Director-General of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, write in their latest Project Syndicate article. Read the article here.
  • Globalisation will continue and get stronger, and how to harness it is the great challenge, says OECD Secretary-General Gurría on Bloomberg TV. Watch the interview here.
  • OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría with UN Secretary-General António Guterres at the 73rd Session of the UN General Assembly, in New York City.
  • The new OECD Observer Crossword, with Myles Mellor. Try it online!
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2019