Merging Japan

Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry

Massive job cuts like those announced in October at the Japanese automotive firm, Nissan Motor – some 21,000 worldwide – always make hard early morning reading.

This must be particularly true for the Japanese, who are traditionally cautious about foreign participation in their firms and for whom mergers are relatively new. Other large OECD countries are more used to the topsy-turvy world of mergers and acquisitions. Some seem frankly unconcerned about who owns their firms, as long as those firms are well managed and deliver the goods, so to speak. And in the globalised market that sentiment is likely to become more widespread.

Cross-border mergers and acquisitions, often called M&As, have grown rapidly in recent years, and are one of the hallmarks of globalisation, reshaping industry at the international level. In fact, the value of M&As worldwide increased more than six-fold during the period 1991-98, from US$85 billion in 1991 to US$558 billion in 1998. The top six were valued at US$169 billion. In 1998, cross-border M&As were worth 60% more than in 1997 and more than twice as much as in 1996. The total number of cross-border M&As also increased rapidly during the same period, from 4,149 in 1991 to 5,373 in 1998, reaching a record high of 6, 310 in 1995.

Most cross-border M&As have taken place in only a handful of countries, particularly the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany. But Japan may be changing. The Nissan-Renault’s global partnership agreement in March 1999, in which Renault spent US$5.4 billion to buy a 36.8% equity stake in Nissan and a 22.5% stake in Nissan Diesel, is just one example. The sluggish local economy and intense competition worldwide gave Nissan little option other than to seek foreign capital. The alliance included a huge capital injection from Renault, but the deal also included allowing Renault’s Chief Operating Officer to formulate revival plans. The job cuts were one of them.

There are other examples of cross-border M&As. Also in the automotive industry, Mazda has put itself in the hands of a foreign partner, Ford of the United States. In the financial sector, the merger of GE Capital of the United States and Toho Mutual Life Insurance Company in April 1998 led to the establishment of GE Edison Life; and Nikko Salomon Smith Barney was established in 1999 as a joint venture with a 51% stake owned by Nikko Securities and a 49% stake by Travelers Group (Salomon Smith Barney).

A series of amendments to the Foreign Exchange Law since 1980 have helped fuel this M&A activity. But Japanese managers still see M&As as a measure of last resort. Japanese corporate culture, including its lifetime employment system and labour immobility, will probably stay cautious as long as the job cuts continue and there may well be a build-up of pressure. On the other hand, these are hard lessons of globalisation, which Japan embraces, and the restructuring resulting from M&As should lead to a stronger economy. What is clear is that more Japanese companies are streamlining their businesses and M&As with domestic or foreign firms are no longer quite as unthinkable as they once were.

dsti.contact@oecd.org

©OECD Observer No 219, December 1999




Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • How do the largest community of British expats living in Spain feel about Brexit? Britons living in Orihuela Costa, Alicante give their views.
  • Brexit is taking up Europe's energy and focus, according to OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría. Watch video.
  • OECD Chief Economist Catherine Mann and former Bank of England Governor Mervyn King discuss the economic merits of a US border adjustment tax and the outlook for US economic growth.
  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa. blogs.worldbank.org
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2017