Whose current accounts are out of line?

Click here for bigger graph ©OECD

Should the US current account imbalance still cause global concern? The question is never far from the headlines in any major business newspaper or television channel.
“Mysteries Of The Gaping Current-Account Gap” is how Business Week screamed it a few years ago. And last year an article in the OECD Observer noted that while some dismissed the deficit as a harmless mirage, most experts agreed that the deficit was unsustainable. There has been little change in the situation since then. The fact that the imbalance is happening at all is in some ways still surprising.From a global point of view, the most striking anomaly is that in recent years capital has been flowing the “wrong way”. According to textbook theories, capital should flow out of rich countries, where it is abundant and labour is scarce, into poor countries where the opposite is true and where the rate of return to capital should be greater. The counterpart of this flow should be current account deficits in the developing world and surpluses in the industrialised nations. But today we see the opposite happening.One explanation is that the rate of return to capital in many emerging countries has actually been lower than in the most advanced countries. This is because weak policies and structural problems have cancelled out the advantage they should have had in attracting savings. Another reason is the productivity surge in the US, which as a mature developed economy should in theory have been slowing down by now, but instead continues to draw in global savings. In fact, in this respect the US is more a “still developing” country than the world’s most advanced one.Current account positions are determined by many factors in the short term. These range from structural differences across economies, such as demographics and the level of development, to policy-driven factors such as changes in the fiscal stance. Two economists, Joseph Gruber and Steven Kamin, found that for 61 developed and developing countries they examined from 1983 to 2003, a surplus is normally higher (or a deficit lower) if: per capita income is higher (as described above); the fiscal surplus is higher; there are more middle-aged families, as young people and the elderly tend to dissave; the economy is more open to international trade; and if institutional settings such as property rights and the rule of law are unfavourable, because they become less attractive for foreign investors.The model predicts a small surplus for the euro area–the current account is in fact broadly balanced and so pretty close–and deficits in Australia and New Zealand, which is the case. The trouble is, using the work by Messrs Gruber and Kamin, one would also expect a surplus in the US, because its higher incomes are large enough to offset its higher growth rate and its fiscal deficit. But no variation of their model was able to explain the ballooning US deficit. On the other hand, the large surpluses in emerging Asia could in part be put down to an investment slump after the 1997 financial crisis. There are differences between the actual and predicted current account positions for most of the countries examined, which reflects the extent to which current accounts appear to be out of line with fundamentals. According to the model, the euro area surplus was around 0.5% of GDP smaller than expected over that period, whereas deficits are larger than expected in the US, Japan and Australia.By this measure, the euro area contributes little to global current account imbalances, and for many, it is the US deficit which is the tricky one to resolve. That does not mean direct intervention can help. Rather, as the OECD Observer article noted a year ago, the market has a lead role to play, as long as the government limits the budget deficit and removes anti-saving biases from policies, while allowing enough fluidity in the economy for resources to shift towards the production of tradable goods and services. RJCReferences©OECD Observer No. 261, May 2007

See www.oecd.org/us



Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q2 2018 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.9% Sept 2018 annual
Trade: +2.7% exp, +3.0% imp, Q4 2017
Unemployment: 5.2% Sept 2018
Last update: 13 Nov 2018

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Globalisation will continue and get stronger, and how to harness it is the great challenge, says OECD Secretary-General Gurría on Bloomberg TV. Watch the interview here.
  • OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría with UN Secretary-General António Guterres at the 73rd Session of the UN General Assembly, in New York City.
  • The new OECD Observer Crossword, with Myles Mellor. Try it online!
  • Watch the webcast of the final press conference of the OECD annual ministerial meeting 2018.
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Rousseau
  • Do you trust your government? The OECD’s How's life 2017 report finds that only 38% of people in OECD countries trust their government. How can we improve our old "Social contract?" Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2018