Korea's young workers

The Korean economic wave continues forward, with strong growth and low unemployment expected in 2008-2009. But the upsurge appears to have left some younger people behind. True, at 10%, Korean youth unemployment is below the OECD average of nearer 15%, and though the country has a lower employment rate, this reflects a much lower school drop-out rate and high participation in education.

However, youth employment has in fact declined quite sharply since 1996, while, unlike the OECD average, unemployment has risen. More needs to be done, says a new report, Jobs for Youth: Korea.Click here for larger graph. Over a third of young workers get trapped in so-called “non-regular” short contracts with limited career prospects, while many graduates cannot find jobs to fit their skills. Jobs for Youth: Korea identifies several reasons. First, the rapid expansion of tertiary education has led to skill mismatches. Second, regulatory obstacles deepen divisions in the job market. And third, unemployed youth, particularly those with less qualifications, need more support when seeking a job. The report makes several recommendations to update the education system and labour market regulatory framework, including to better link education and work, reform employment protection legislation, and prioritise less qualified youth.

Jobs for Youth: Korea is the latest in a series by the OECD covering some 16 countries. Order it at www.oecdbookshop.org.

©OECD Observer No. 264/265, December 2007-January 2008



Economic data

GDP growth: +0.5% Q2 2019 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 1.9% August 2019 annual
Trade: +0.4% exp, -1.2% imp, Q1 2019
Unemployment: 5.1% August 2019
Last update: 9 September 2019

OECD Observer Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Subscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

Have the OECD Observer delivered
to your door



Edition Q2 2019

Previous editions

Don't miss

Most Popular Articles

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2019