Coping with the consequences of ageing

Economics Department
Page 11 

Click for larger graph

The long-term picture for the US economy very much depends on one thing: how policies are developed to deal with ageing and the shifting structure of the population. 

"The economy, stupid" has been a proud motto in US politics in recent years, and with good reason. But for it to work in the years ahead, the demographics had better not be forgotten. The next forty years will see a major change in the structure of the US population: the number of elderly is expected to increase markedly while the growth of the working population should slacken.

The number of people over the age of 65 for each person of working age could almost double. The US changes are predicted to be much less severe than in many other OECD countries, since the US population will benefit from relatively high fertility and immigration. Nevertheless, the economic implications are still serious.

There is also likely to be a slackening in economic expansion owing mainly to slower growth in the labour force. If that happens, with the elderly consuming more than the working population, personal savings may keep declining in the longer term, which, despite capital inflows, could result in lower growth of the capital stock and productivity. And that will affect living standards.

Taking the strain

Fortunately for the United States, the private sector runs a well-developed pension saving industry, so lessening the strain on public finances, at least compared to other OECD countries. Most notable has been the successful experience with 401 (k) defined-contribution plans, introduced in 1978 to induce people to accumulate assets in preparation for their retirement. At the end of 1997, more than $1.8 trillion was invested in 401 (k) and similar plans, almost three times the size of the Social Security Trust Fund portfolio. Two positive aspects of this "success story" are worth noting: 401 (k) plans have improved the ease with which retirement saving can be preserved when changing jobs, which is good for labour flexibility; and second, they have also given individuals more responsibility as to their own investment decisions for retirement purposes.

But there will be strains on public finances. In the next four decades, according to official projections, social security pension payments and health care costs for the elderly seem likely to expand by 2.25% and 4% of GDP, respectively. As a result, by 2034, actuarial estimates suggest that there will be no assets left in the Social Security Trust Fund. However, while Social Security and Medicare may be running large deficits, the remainder of the federal budget should be generating significant surpluses. Over the very long run, with no policy changes, Social Security and Medicare could be running deficits equivalent to 0.8% and 1.3% of GDP.

Increases in Medicaid for the elderly will also add 0.3% of GDP to the deficit -- a total deficit due to ageing of 2.4% of GDP. On the other hand, the remainder of the budget has room for tax cuts amounting to 1.6% of GDP -- provided that Congress sticks to the President's spending plans. This illustrates the importance of viewing the government sector as a whole, rather than just focusing on the ageing components of the budget.

While the likely overall surplus in the remainder of the budget may be sufficient to ensure the future of Social Security, it cannot finance both Social Security and Medicare. Structural changes to both of these programmes are required, rather than just book- keeping adjustments. The scale of the changes that need to be made to public finances is, however, relatively small -- less than 1% of GDP compared to the improvement in public finances seen over the past six years.

The President's proposal for saving Social Security involves creating a reserve to prolong the life of Social Security. This planned reserve should ensure that the unified budget (including Social Security) remains in surplus and adds to national saving. This is a positive development because international experience shows how difficult it is to sustain and increase a budget surplus.

As yet, no proposals have been made as to how to safeguard Social Security over the very long term. This would likely require consideration of some of the following options: some acceleration in the planned increases in the retirement age, some linking of retirement age to life expectancy and perhaps lower cost of living adjustments. Moreover, part of the President's proposal rests on obtaining high, and far from certain, returns from investing part of the Social Security Fund in equities. In addition, this part of the President's plan may lead to the government holding 4% of each and every US quoted company, so raising issues of corporate governance.

Another element of the President's plan, the creation of Universal Saving Accounts, would be a step to boosting the saving of low-income families. It may be appropriate to build on the proposed voluntary individual savings accounts in order to safeguard the well-being of the elderly beyond 2059 when, even with the proposed transfers, the Trust Fund will be exhausted. To this end, the accounts could be redesigned as mandatory.

The biggest gap in current policy relates to Medicare. Progressively moving Medicare towards a managed care framework would seem appropriate, using the federal employees' health care plan as a basis for Medicare reform. In this regard, the proposals that were made by the Chairman of the Medicare Commission appear reasonable. But reform is also necessary in the area of integrating the long-term care services provided by state and federal governments and supporting more home and community-based care systems for the elderly, but with strict control over home-care assistance.

Increasing participation in the labour force is another way to provide increased resources to meet the costs of ageing. Already, far-reaching reform has substantially reduced welfare rolls and a strong economy has boosted the employment of disadvantaged groups. A lasting improvement in the position of the least advantaged will require an enhancement of their educational opportunities. The Survey points out that one way of achieving this is to lessen the extreme variations in spending among different school districts.

Elsewhere, legislation underpinning financial regulation should be reformed. The Glass-Steagall Act, dating from the Great Depression, created barriers between banks and other financial institutions, which should be removed. In addition, artificial barriers between over-the-counter markets in derivatives and futures exchanges should be lifted by relaxing the prohibitions of some activities of regulated exchanges.

A lot to do therefore. But the mathematics suggest there is little choice, as well as little time, to get the policies right. Certainly, in future years, keeping demographics close to the heart of US economic thinking and strategy would be a wise move. Neglecting it would not. Perhaps there is a clever motto in there too somewhere. n


Maintaining Prosperity in an Ageing Society, OECD Paris, 1998.

United States Economic Survey, OECD Paris, 1999.

©OECD Observer No 217/218, Summer 1999 

Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q4 2017 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.6% May 2018 annual
Trade: +2.7% exp, +3.0% imp, Q4 2017
Unemployment: 5.4% Mar 2018
Last update: 06 Jul 2018


Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Watch the webcast of the final press conference of the OECD annual ministerial meeting 2018.
  • International co-operation, inclusive growth and digitalisation lead the themes of the 2018 OECD Forum in Paris on 29-30 May, under the banner of What brings us together It is held alongside the annual OECD Ministerial Council Meeting on 30-31 May, chaired this year by France with a focus on multilateralism
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • Ambassador Aleksander Surdej, Permanent Representative of Poland to the OECD, was a guest on France 24’s English-language show “The Debate”, where he discussed French President Emmanuel Macron’s speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Rousseau
  • Do you trust your government? The OECD’s How's life 2017 report finds that only 38% of people in OECD countries trust their government. How can we improve our old "Social contract?" Read more.
  • Papers show “past coming back to haunt us”: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria tells Sky News that the so-called "Paradise Papers" show a past coming back to haunt us, but one which is now being dismantled. Please watch the video.
  • When someone asks me to describe an ideal girl, in my head, she is a person who is physically and mentally independent, brave to speak her mind, treated with respect just like she treats others, and inspiring to herself and others. But I know that the reality is still so much different. By Alda, 18, on International Day of the Girl. Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Read some of the insightful remarks made at OECD Forum 2017, held on 6-7 June. OECD Forum kick-started events with a focus on inclusive growth, digitalisation, and trust, under the overall theme of Bridging Divides.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2018