©David Rooney

The WTO: moving forward

OECD Observer

Seattle was a drama, not a crisis. The doomsters got it wrong. 

Trade used to be unspectacular – even boring – to most people. Negotiations on tariff-rate quotas, voluntary export restraints and technical barriers to trade did not set too many pulses racing. The World Trade Organisation’s predecessor, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), plodded on with the dry work of liberalising world trade amid the silence of public apathy.

How times change! The WTO is now at the heart of a passionate debate about the defining issue of our time: globalisation. We get the same sort of media coverage as sport or national politics. It’s either triumph or disaster; victory or defeat; nothing in between is recognised.

To be sure, the nuts and bolts of the multilateral trading system’s work has not changed that much. Government negotiators still spend hours holed up haggling over the minutiae of international trade deals. But they now do so under the spotlight of public scrutiny and amid the crossfire of a burgeoning backlash against globalisation.

I welcome the new scrutiny. The WTO does important work and decisions taken in this institution affect the lives of ordinary men and women all over the world. It is right that the WTO be held accountable for its record.

Let me add that we have nothing to hide. On the contrary: we have plenty to be proud of. The multilateral trading system is a powerful force for good in the world. The 15-fold rise in world trade over the past 50 years has probably done more to raise living standards and lift people around the globe out of poverty than any other man-made device. The gains to the world economy from the Uruguay Round alone come to over $240 billion a year. That’s a pretty good return on the $75 million a year that governments chip in to the WTO’s budget. The WTO also provides a stable and predictable framework for business by locking in governments’ commitments to liberalise. And we operate a dispute-settlement system which makes it easier for member governments to resolve their trade disputes without coming to blows.

Perhaps inevitably, though, the WTO has had trouble adapting to the new environment in which it operates. And we are also just beginning to develop responses to new agendas which some people and groups are seeking to have placed before this institution. To some extent the pressures of this new environment were reflected in the failure to launch a new round of world trade negotiations in Seattle last December. And yet, although it was a great disappointment, this was not the first – nor probably the last – time that trade ministers fail to agree. Old GATT hands will recall the abortive attempt to launch a new round in Geneva in 1982 or the stalemate in Brussels in 1990. Yet Seattle was widely portrayed both in the media and by our critics as a death-knell for the WTO. They turned a drama into a crisis.

Thankfully, the critics have been proved wrong and the doom and gloom stories of six months ago have been shown up for the nonsense they were. The WTO has survived and we are making good progress on a very important negotiating agenda.

First, we have successfully launched major negotiations on agriculture and services. These negotiations are proceeding much better than many expected. Together, the sectors account for over two-thirds of world output. The potential gains from further liberalisation in these areas are huge.

Let me give an example. According to one OECD calculation, consumers and governments in rich countries pay $350 billion per year to support agriculture – enough to fly their 41 million dairy cows first class around the world one and a half times. Think of the benefits to everybody if the cost of these support levels were reduced.

Second, we have worked through an important package to help the world’s poorest countries reap greater benefits from the world trading system. This package includes better access to rich-country markets, increased technical assistance, and closer co-operation between the WTO and other global institutions that promote development, notably the World Bank.

Third, we have established a mechanism for dealing with the problems that some developing countries have with implementing some of their commitments from the Uruguay Round. This was a major area of difference at Seattle.

Fourth, we are looking at ways to improve how the WTO works, and in particular how to adjust to having 137 members, all of whom demand respect and their rightful seat at our table.

Last but certainly not least, thirty candidates, more than 1.5 billion people, are lining up to join the WTO. This is a clear vote of confidence in the WTO system and we are doing everything we can to facilitate their entry under the appropriate conditions. In June Georgia became our 137th member and the fourth former Soviet republic to join. Russia itself is actively pursuing accession. China, Croatia and Oman are on track to join the WTO this year. Once they do, the WTO will be much closer to being a truly "World" Trade Organisation.

The overall effect of these efforts is a climate in the WTO which is much better and more encouraging than a year ago. There is lots more to be done and we can’t be complacent. But we are institutionally in good shape to move the multilateral trade agenda forward significantly.

Many of our critics would rather the WTO did nothing. They claim we do enough harm as it is. At the same time as we acknowledge and seek to respond seriously to the many issues and banners that our detractors carried to Seattle and more recently Washington, we must never lose sight of our deeper commitment to improving the living standards of all people.

©OECD Observer 221/222, Summer 2000




Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • “Nizip” refugee camp visit
    July 2016: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría visits the “Nizip” refugee camp, situated between Gaziantep and the Turkish-Syrian border, accompanied by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek. The camp accommodates a small number of the 2.75 million Syrians currently registered in Turkey, mostly outside the camps. In his tour of the camp, Mr Gurría visits a school, speaks with refugees and gives a short interview.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • Queen Maxima of the Netherlands gives a speech next to Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto (not pictured) during the International Forum of Financial Inclusion at the National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico June 21, 2016.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • OECD Environment Director Simon Upton presented a talk at Imperial College London on 21 April 2016. With the world awash in surplus oil and prices languishing around US$40 per barrel, how can governments step up efforts to transform the world’s energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement?
  • Happy 10th birthday to Twitter. This 2008 OECD Observer interview with Henry Copeland said you’d do well.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Once migrants reach Europe, countries face integration challenge: OECD's Thomas Liebig speaks to NPR's Audie Cornish.

  • Message from the International Space Station to COP21

  • COP21 Will Get Agreement With Teeth: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría on Bloomberg

  • The carbon clock is ticking: OECD’s Gurría on CNBC

  • If we want to reach zero net emissions by the end of the century, we must align our policies for a low-carbon economy, put a price on carbon everywhere, spend less subsidising fossil fuels and invest more in clean energy. OECD at #COP21 – OECD statement for #COP21
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa. blogs.worldbank.org
  • Pole to Paris Project
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • How can cities fight climate change?
    Discover projects in Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan and Mexico.
  • Climate: What's changed, what hasn't, what we can do about it.
    Lecture by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, hosted by the London School of Economics and Aviva Investors in association with ClimateWise, London, UK, 3 July 2015.

  • Climate change: “We should not disagree when scientists tell us we have a window of opportunity–10-15 years–to turn this thing around” argues Senator Bernie Sanders.

  • In the long-run, the EU benefits from migration, says OECD Head of International Migration Division Jean-Christophe Dumont.
  • Is technological progress slowing down? Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on www.ft.com.
  • Catherine Mann, OECD Chief Economist, explains on Bloomberg why "too much bank lending can slow economic growth".
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .

Most Popular Articles

Poll

What issue are you most concerned about in 2016?

Unemployment
Euro crisis
International conflict
Global warming
Other

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2016