Trade rules for fair play

Trade Directorate

WTO rules can help in the fight against corruption. That would be good for trade. 

There is no single international definition of bribery and corruption, just as there is no single area where corruption manifests itself. Still, international trade is an area that is particularly vulnerable to corrupt practices. Not surprisingly, within the detail of WTO agreements are rules which contribute to the fight against corruption by helping to build a domestic regulatory environment where corruption is less likely to occur.

There are essentially two ways to combat corruption, either by dissuasion or prevention. The former aims to reduce the gains from corruption through sanctions, such as criminalising corrupt behaviour or excluding corrupt companies from access to economic benefits. The latter seeks to introduce competition in government, reduce the areas of bureaucratic discretion by clarifying applicable rules, improve transparency and scrutiny to make corruption less rewarding and more risky, and eliminate the motives for corrupt behaviour. Improving the wage levels of public officials may be one way of doing this. Granting import/export permits more easily and without having to pay a bribe is another.

WTO rules and disciplines are on the “preventive” side. The implementation of various provisions, such as on Customs Valuation, Pre-shipment Inspection, Government Procurement and Rules of Origin, aims to clarify applicable rules, reduce the complexity of procedures and improve the predictability of the regulatory system. Even though neither the 1994 GATT agreement nor any of the other WTO agreements specifically address corruption and bribery, they certainly fight it by reducing bureaucratic arbitrariness and improving transparency and accountability, even to outside evaluators.

The gradual liberalisation of world trade in general, namely through tariff bindings, specific commitments in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and provisions of agreements such as that on Technical Barriers to Trade, helps to eliminate the business incentives for corrupt behaviour by legally reducing overall operation costs. This means that conforming with WTO obligations is a process which not only helps countries to reap the benefits of trade liberalisation, but also to improve their domestic regulatory environment, making it less prone to corruption.

Rules of the game 

Non-discrimination rules are vital to the multilateral trading system. They provide for equality of competitive opportunities between like products and services and help to prevent trade distortion. And they have to function properly to win the confidence of businesses and other stakeholders, including governments. Corrupt practices are clearly a violation of those rules because they result in discriminatory treatment. For this reason, the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, for instance, requires that if fees are charged for assessing the conformity of products coming into a country, they should be no different to fees charged for assessing similar products of national origin or goods coming from any other country.

Bribery and corruption thrive on secrecy. The 1994 GATT requires that “laws, regulations, judicial decisions and administrative rulings … be published promptly in such a manner as to enable governments and traders to become acquainted with them.” And the Government Procurement Agreement contains a series of provisions, which seek to ensure that the tendering procedures are open and transparent to all interested parties. In fact, unsuccessful bidders have to be provided with such additional information on the contract award as may be necessary to ensure that the procurement was made fairly and impartially.

Assuring a stable and predictable business environment is one of the main reasons for creating a multilateral trading system in the first place. By reducing risks, a predictable trading system not only facilitates trade and investment flows, but could also remove any incentive firms may have for acting corruptly. Unwarranted administrative delays are in many cases seen as trade barriers, and bribes are often required to secure a more efficient service. This practice is one of the targets of the WTO’s Pre-shipment Inspection Agreement, which requires that an inspection be concluded within five working days.

Clear rules make it harder for public officials to make abusive requests and for businesses to ask for unwarranted preferential treatment. In other words, impartiality is vital and the GATS seeks to achieve this, by demanding its signatories to “ensure that all measures of general application are administered in a reasonable, objective and impartial manner.” The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights takes an equally tough stance: “Procedures concerning the enforcement of intellectual property rights shall be fair and equitable. They shall not be unnecessarily complicated or costly, or entail unreasonable time limits or unwarranted delays.” And the preamble of the Customs Valuation Agreement recognises the need for a “fair, uniform and neutral system for the valuation of goods for customs purposes that precludes the use of arbitrary or fictitious customs values”.

WTO rules can make a contribution to building a less corrupt world, though technical assistance may be needed to help developing countries enforce them effectively. But while reducing the opportunities and motivations for corruption through trade regulations is a valuable preventive weapon in the fight against bribery, experience shows that it is not enough to eradicate corruption. Moreover, WTO rights and obligations apply only to states and not to individuals, businesses or other private parties. This means that the enforcement by a government of its WTO obligations may affect the acts of corrupt public officials requesting or accepting bribes, but it does not concern the payment of bribes by private businesses to public officials. That is where the OECD Convention comes in. The two instruments reinforce each other and are perfectly complementary. Indeed, together the Convention and the WTO rules can help make international trade both freer and fairer.

©OECD Observer No 220, April 2000

Economic data


Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • When someone asks me to describe an ideal girl, in my head, she is a person who is physically and mentally independent, brave to speak her mind, treated with respect just like she treats others, and inspiring to herself and others. But I know that the reality is still so much different. By Alda, 18, on International Day of the Girl. Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Read some of the insightful remarks made at OECD Forum 2017, held on 6-7 June. OECD Forum kick-started events with a focus on inclusive growth, digitalisation, and trust, under the overall theme of Bridging Divides.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • How do the largest community of British expats living in Spain feel about Brexit? Britons living in Orihuela Costa, Alicante give their views.
  • Brexit is taking up Europe's energy and focus, according to OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría. Watch video.
  • OECD Chief Economist Catherine Mann and former Bank of England Governor Mervyn King discuss the economic merits of a US border adjustment tax and the outlook for US economic growth.
  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2017