R&D personnel

The Nordic countries and Japan have a large number of people assigned to R&D in relation to the total labour force. In 1997 some 1.6% of the labour force was working in R&D in Finland, more than 1.5% in Sweden and 1.3% in Japan. Not far behind were Denmark, France, Germany and the Netherlands, where research personnel accounted for over 1% of the labour force. But in technologically lagging countries, such as Mexico, Turkey and Greece, the proportion did not exceed 0.1%.

Data on R&D personnel help to gauge the extent of a country’s R&D activity. They depend on a number of different factors, including research outlays, the skills level of the labour force, industrial specialisation and, of course, government funding. The data available encompass all persons performing R&D, though people providing services directly linked to R&D work, such as managers, administrators and office workers, are also included. Such professionals fall into three categories: researchers, scientists and engineers; technicians and similar personnel; and support staff. The chart incorporates all categories of personnel assigned to R&D, except for the United States, where only the number of researchers is available.

The breakdown of R&D workers between the public and business sectors varies by country. The large size of R&D personnel in the public sectors of New Zealand and Australia reflects the fact that the indicators for those countries include R&D staff working in universities.

©OECD Observer No 220, April 2000




Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q1 2019 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.3% May 2019 annual
Trade: +0.4% exp, -1.2% imp, Q1 2019
Unemployment: 5.2% July 2019
Last update: 9 September 2019

OECD Observer Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Subscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

Have the OECD Observer delivered
to your door



Edition Q2 2019

Previous editions

Don't miss

Most Popular Articles

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2019