US health spending: A closer look

OECD Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs

The United States spent 16% of its national income (GDP) on health in 2007. This is by far the highest share in the OECD and more than seven percentage points higher than the average of 8.9% in OECD countries. Even France, Switzerland and Germany, the countries which, apart from the United States, spend the greatest proportion of national income on health, spent over 5 percentage points of GDP less: respectively 11.0%, 10.8% and 10.4% of their GDP.

However, almost all OECD countries, with the exception of the US and the middle-income countries, Mexico and Turkey, have full insurance coverage of their population. Americans consumed $7,290 of health services per person in 2007, almost two-and- a-half times more than the OECD average of just under $3,000 (adjusted for the differences in price levels in different countries). Norway and Switzerland spent around $4,500 per person. Americans spend more than twice as much as relatively rich European countries such as France, Germany and the United Kingdom.

One factor which cannot explain why the US spends more than other countries is population aging. Many European countries and Japan have been aging much more rapidly than the United States. Similarly, Americans are not any more likely to be sick than Europeans or Japanese people, though the very high rates of overweight and obesity are already costly and will drive health spending higher in the coming decades. Americans have had much lower rates of smoking than most other OECD countries since 1980, and so this should be contributing to better health outcomes. Health expenditure can be broken down into different categories of spending:

• In-patient spending is higher than in other OECD countries, but not by as much as might be expected, given differences in GDP.

• Out-patient care spending is also highest in the United States, being more than three-times greater than in France, Germany and Japan, and growing very rapidly indeed. The growth rate is high in other countries as well, but from a lower basis.

• Administrative costs are high.

• Pharmaceutical spending is higher in the US than in any other country, but it accounts for a smaller share of total health spending than in other countries.

• Long-term care spending is a little higher than in other countries, but proportionally accounts for less spending than elsewhere.

The stand-out difference in spending in the United States compared with other OECD countries is in elective interventions on a same-day basis. These accounted for a quarter of the growth in US health spending between 2003 and 2006, compared with just 4% of the growth in Canadian spending. Such services are an important innovation in healthcare delivery, often being preferred, when possible, by patients to staying overnight in a hospital.

Remuneration of US GPs exceeds those of doctors in other countries (being $25,000 to $40,000 more than in UK, Germany and Canada, and $60,000 more than in France, though the data is old, coming from 2003- 05). The gap was even larger for specialists. Income levels reflect both fees and activity–physicians are often remunerated on a fee-for service basis, so the high rates of income of US doctors might reflect both higher fees and higher activity than in other countries. On balance, however, it seems likely that at least some part of the high rates of remuneration are due to high prices rather than to high volume of activity.

Another component of out-patient care costs that has grown rapidly in the United States in recent years is the cost related to diagnostic tests, such as medical resonance imaging (MRI) scans and computed tomography (CT) scans. Billions of dollars are now spent each year on such tests in the United States.

Some studies have attempted to assess the medical benefits of the substantial increase in MRI and CT exams in the United States but found no conclusive evidence.

This is an extract from a written statement submitted by Mark Pearson to the US Senate’s Special Committee on Aging in September 2009. The full 2,500 word statement is available online at and at 

©OECD Observer No 276-277 December 2009-January 2010

Economic data


Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • When someone asks me to describe an ideal girl, in my head, she is a person who is physically and mentally independent, brave to speak her mind, treated with respect just like she treats others, and inspiring to herself and others. But I know that the reality is still so much different. By Alda, 18, on International Day of the Girl. Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Read some of the insightful remarks made at OECD Forum 2017, held on 6-7 June. OECD Forum kick-started events with a focus on inclusive growth, digitalisation, and trust, under the overall theme of Bridging Divides.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • How do the largest community of British expats living in Spain feel about Brexit? Britons living in Orihuela Costa, Alicante give their views.
  • Brexit is taking up Europe's energy and focus, according to OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría. Watch video.
  • OECD Chief Economist Catherine Mann and former Bank of England Governor Mervyn King discuss the economic merits of a US border adjustment tax and the outlook for US economic growth.
  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2017