Maternal mortality: helping mothers live

Click for larger graph

The reduction of maternal mortality ratios by three-quarters between 1990 and 2015 as an international development goal. 

More than 500,000 women died during pregnancy and childbirth in 1995 – and many more millions suffered without treatment. Large as the problem is, resolving it might not be as difficult as many believe.

Every minute of every day, somewhere in the world, a woman dies following pregnancy - related complications – 514,000 deaths each year. For every woman who dies, many more suffer disabilities that can affect them for the rest of their lives. The neglect that contributes to the deaths of women also compromises the health and survival of the infants they are carrying and the older children they leave behind.

Deaths during pregnancy or childbirth are unlike other deaths in developing countries. They happen only to young women, not because of disease, but during what should be a normal process. Childbirth is of course part of human survival and should be an event for the mother to celebrate. Society has a duty, therefore, to ensure that women are able to go safely through pregnancy and childbirth. But as women continue to die, it is a failure of their societies, their health systems and their families and communities.

The overwhelming majority of the more than half a million maternal deaths each year occur in developing countries. In the developed world, the maternal mortality ratio averages around 21 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. By contrast, in developing countries the ratio is 20 times higher, at 440 per 100,000. While these numbers are subject to margins of uncertainty, there is no question that the risk of maternal death is most acute in sub-Saharan Africa and in parts of south-east Asia. In some regions, such as eastern and western Africa, the ratio may be as high as 1,000 deaths per 100,000 live births. In fact, a woman in Africa faces a one in 16 chance of dying from pregnancy-related causes; by contrast, for her sister in the developed countries, the risk is one in 2,500. The discrepancy between these two figures is one of the widest differentials between rich and poor countries, wider even than the gaps in child mortality.

Maternal deaths are all the more tragic because they can be prevented in simple and cost-effective ways. Infections, blood loss and unsafe abortion account for the majority of deaths; all these causes are well within the abilities of health workers with midwifery skills to tackle. The management of infection, shock, blood loss and convulsions, and surgical procedures, such as caesarean delivery, do not require high technology equipment or expensive drugs.

Alone in labour

There is a strong association between levels of maternal mortality and the proportion of births that are assisted by a skilled health care worker. Indeed, the proportion of births attended by skilled personnel is a key indicator for tracking progress in reducing maternal mortality. Globally, just over half of all deliveries are attended by a skilled birth assistant; for many of the rest, mothers will have the help of relatives or traditional birth attendants; millions deliver entirely alone. Poor mothers are much less likely to have access to a skilled birth attendant than richer ones; they are therefore more likely to die too.

The development goal is to change all that, by having skilled attendants at 90% of births by 2015 in regions where they are not routinely available. It is a tough challenge, since progress has been relatively modest over the past decade (see graphs), with an average annual increase in care coverage at delivery of under 1% in 1988-1998. Significant improvements in coverage have occurred in some countries, notably Bolivia, Egypt, Indonesia and Morocco, but in sub-Saharan Africa as a whole, there has been a decline. It is a disturbing trend and is probably caused by barriers to access like high cost of services and drugs, transport difficulties (including costs) and distrust of the services that are provided.

When $3 goes a long way 

Reducing maternal mortality is not necessarily dependent on economic development. It would cost only about $3 a person a year in low-income countries to provide the essential services needed to tackle the problem: that would cover a skilled health worker to assist every delivery, access to essential obstetric care for mothers and their infants when complications arise, and family planning information and services so that unwanted pregnancies and unsafe abortions can be avoided.

No country is so poor that it cannot afford the key interventions needed. Indeed, no country can afford not to put resources and energy into safe motherhood, for as other articles in this Spotlight show, neglect of women drives poverty and robs the next generation of hope for a better future. What is lacking is not the level of national wealth, but the level of commitment to do something. Conscious decisions are required; China, Cuba, Iran, Malaysia and Sri Lanka have all been able to achieve and maintain significant reductions in levels of maternal mortality by deliberately allocating the resources where they were needed.

Decision-makers at political, economic, social, religious and household levels (which tend to be dominated by men) have to realise that pregnancy and childbirth can and should be made safer. After all, the very fabric of their societies depends on it. 

©OECD Observer No 223, October 2000

Economic data


Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • “Nizip” refugee camp visit
    July 2016: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría visits the “Nizip” refugee camp, situated between Gaziantep and the Turkish-Syrian border, accompanied by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek. The camp accommodates a small number of the 2.75 million Syrians currently registered in Turkey, mostly outside the camps. In his tour of the camp, Mr Gurría visits a school, speaks with refugees and gives a short interview.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • Queen Maxima of the Netherlands gives a speech next to Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto (not pictured) during the International Forum of Financial Inclusion at the National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico June 21, 2016.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • OECD Environment Director Simon Upton presented a talk at Imperial College London on 21 April 2016. With the world awash in surplus oil and prices languishing around US$40 per barrel, how can governments step up efforts to transform the world’s energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement?
  • Happy 10th birthday to Twitter. This 2008 OECD Observer interview with Henry Copeland said you’d do well.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Once migrants reach Europe, countries face integration challenge: OECD's Thomas Liebig speaks to NPR's Audie Cornish.

  • Message from the International Space Station to COP21

  • The carbon clock is ticking: OECD’s Gurría on CNBC

  • If we want to reach zero net emissions by the end of the century, we must align our policies for a low-carbon economy, put a price on carbon everywhere, spend less subsidising fossil fuels and invest more in clean energy. OECD at #COP21 – OECD statement for #COP21
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa.
  • Pole to Paris Project
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • How can cities fight climate change?
    Discover projects in Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan and Mexico.
  • Climate: What's changed, what hasn't, what we can do about it.
    Lecture by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, hosted by the London School of Economics and Aviva Investors in association with ClimateWise, London, UK, 3 July 2015.
  • Is technological progress slowing down? Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .

Most Popular Articles


What issue are you most concerned about in 2016?

Euro crisis
International conflict
Global warming

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2016