A better future for work?

International Futures Programme

It appears that with every passing age work in most societies has got better and less exploitative. Now, with new technologies profound transformations within the firm are again in store. Will those changes deliver new benefits and improve the quality of life as before?

The impact of information tech-nology (IT) on work is a question which probably worries us more than we care to admit. Will information technology be a liberating force on the individual and the herald of a new social and economic contract? Or will it cause a drastic cut in jobs and massive unemployment? Will the quality of life be improved by opportunities both inside and outside the workplace, or will the work experience deteriorate into a race, with the jobless in search of unstable, unpredictable and above all insecure contracts?

To start with, it is most likely that IT - as with other forms of technological changes in the past - will have an impact, not so much on the overall employment level, as on its makeup. The nature of working relations will also be deeply affected by IT, as it brings about a radical transformation in the organisation of production. There will be a reduction in the layers of management and virtual organisations will emerge without fixed locations and with flexible, demand-oriented, production networks.

As to the composition of employment, many jobs are likely to be destroyed, notably low-skill repetitive jobs and middle management posts, as organisational structures become flatter. Even highly qualified professionals, such as medical doctors and lawyers, will not be immune to the onslaught of IT. At the same time, new forms of employment will become more prevalent; notably, participation in task-specific team production and teleworking will usher in a new type of job tenure, a sort of "jobless" employment market.

These changes will bring new challenges for employees and for employers alike. Employees will have to be prepared to upgrade their skills on an on-going basis and to switch jobs, perhaps several times in their career, as a matter of course. They may have more frequent spells being unemployed, or on time-out between jobs. Overall, employees will need to be more entrepreneurial in their career development and will have to adjust to a new working environment where the very concept of job, as we know it, will have evolved and may even disappear.

But employers too will need to adjust. With innovation, rapid product cycles and high quality as basic requirements for success in the market place, firms will have to find new, flexible ways of employing knowledge workers effectively. In this context, resolving tensions between the need for a secure environment to nurture employee initiative and the potential insecurity due to unfamiliar work relationships will be important. This will call for managerial innovations in the way both work schedules and job descriptions are tailored to the needs of employees. Notably, employers will have to pay particular attention to the needs of "core knowledge workers", who are workers charged with knowledge production who will probably insist on less linear, less hierarchically defined career paths. In a more competitive environment where human capital will play an increasingly dominant role, such workers will be in a strong position to negotiate their fees and their working conditions. Firms will have to bid for employee time, which may drive up wages for certain skills, though boosting efficiency and improving business-partner relations.

Job satisfaction

As the job market changes, the workplace experience will change too. The question is in which direction, good or bad? According to some, it will deteriorate. Just as mechanisation resulted in the dehumanisation of work in assembly line industries, it is feared that future workers will become mere extensions or servants of computer-driven production processes. As system software increasingly controls and defines the work to be done, computerisation may turn many contracts into mind-numbing McJobs, with individuals being systematically stripped of their capacity for human involvement and judgement.

Optimistic technophiles, on the other hand, argue that the quality of work will improve for most of us and that those who are left out will still be able to enjoy a higher level of income. This sounds perhaps a little utopic, though there is a logic to it. The argument is that increased prosperity brought about by progress in information technology will result in a major increase in leisure time, which in turn will translate into more fulfilling lives. Not only will individuals have more time out for themselves and more money to enjoy it with, but also work itself will become more rewarding. Indeed, for some workers the distinction between work and leisure will become blurred as they find they are able to work at what they enjoy doing. This is because "intelligent" machines and systems will do the dirty, dreary work, replacing manual labour and some of the more mundane intellectual work too.

Decision support programmes will provide essential help for more complex intellectual work, allowing individuals to focus on the most satisfying tasks. In this vision of the future, work will increasingly become a means to satisfy higher order needs, part of one's self-fulfilment. In other words, work could become a hobby for more and more people. In this optimistic scenario, even those who cannot find the jobs they want will be better off as the rising tide of affluence lifts all boats, improving welfare programmes and ensuring that the basic needs of society are indeed met.

On balance, there is good reason to believe that IT can bring about a period of unprecedented material prosperity to the world. Indeed, it is quite possible that, after a period of painful adjustment, workplace improvements will spread globally in the longer run, albeit perhaps in an uneven way, with some periods and places witnessing faster progress than others. As the technophiles argue, our pay cheques and welfare payments should on the whole become fatter. However, there is no guarantee that everyone, or even most of us, will benefit.

Indeed, if current trends in income are a harbinger of things to come, income inequality may very well increase in the future, possibly becoming a source of serious social upheaval. So, will IT favour only an affluent highly skilled small elite, while the less skilled become poorer as they are automated out of the equation and cornered in dumbed-down jobs? That is a key question and it is one on which the true promise of new technology will be judged.

Other stories on this Spotlight on the 21st century

©OECD Observer No 217/218, Summer 1999




Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • “Nizip” refugee camp visit
    July 2016: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría visits the “Nizip” refugee camp, situated between Gaziantep and the Turkish-Syrian border, accompanied by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek. The camp accommodates a small number of the 2.75 million Syrians currently registered in Turkey, mostly outside the camps. In his tour of the camp, Mr Gurría visits a school, speaks with refugees and gives a short interview.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • Queen Maxima of the Netherlands gives a speech next to Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto (not pictured) during the International Forum of Financial Inclusion at the National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico June 21, 2016.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • OECD Environment Director Simon Upton presented a talk at Imperial College London on 21 April 2016. With the world awash in surplus oil and prices languishing around US$40 per barrel, how can governments step up efforts to transform the world’s energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement?
  • Happy 10th birthday to Twitter. This 2008 OECD Observer interview with Henry Copeland said you’d do well.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Once migrants reach Europe, countries face integration challenge: OECD's Thomas Liebig speaks to NPR's Audie Cornish.

  • Message from the International Space Station to COP21

  • The carbon clock is ticking: OECD’s Gurría on CNBC

  • If we want to reach zero net emissions by the end of the century, we must align our policies for a low-carbon economy, put a price on carbon everywhere, spend less subsidising fossil fuels and invest more in clean energy. OECD at #COP21 – OECD statement for #COP21
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa. blogs.worldbank.org
  • Pole to Paris Project
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • How can cities fight climate change?
    Discover projects in Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan and Mexico.
  • Climate: What's changed, what hasn't, what we can do about it.
    Lecture by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, hosted by the London School of Economics and Aviva Investors in association with ClimateWise, London, UK, 3 July 2015.
  • Is technological progress slowing down? Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on www.ft.com.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .

Most Popular Articles

Poll

What issue are you most concerned about in 2016?

Unemployment
Euro crisis
International conflict
Global warming
Other

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2016