Durable flows, durable benefits

©David Rooney

In a world of volatility, poorer countries should aim for equity inflows – portfolio equity and FDI – if they want growth to last.

The proponents of open capital markets are often criticised for offering more “banner-waving” than hard evidence on the benefits that developing countries can derive from free capital flows. Indeed, in contrast to the benefits of free trade in goods and services, the empirical evidence that economists have been able to establish on the costs and benefits of foreign savings has been very sketchy and contradictory.

This failure can easily be explained: a rigorous attempt to quantify the gains that countries have made from international capital mobility would require a fully articulated model in which the situation of no capital movements could be simulated for comparison. Moreover, the time series for private capital flows to developing countries, except for foreign direct investment (FDI), are not yet long enough to draw strong conclusions since the flows started in earnest only at the end of the 1980s. Finally, studies which focus on the absence or presence of capital controls cannot allow for varying degrees of intensity in the operation of capital-account restrictions.

A statement as common as it is trivial is that capital flows carry benefits as well as risks. But can we establish something close to a pecking order for the broad categories of capital flows in terms of their benefits and risks for the recipient countries? The answer is yes, although it requires looking at the channels through which these benefits and risks emerge.

Economic theory suggests that foreign savings can be beneficial in many ways. They stimulate capital accumulation by adding to domestic savings and they raise the recipient economy’s efficiency (e.g., through improving resource allocation, instilling competition, improving human capital, deepening domestic financial markets and reducing local capital costs). At the same time, foreign savings lower consumption risks through enlarging choices for portfolio diversification and by sharing risks more evenly between capital exporters and importers.

Risky flows

The inherent risks to specific types of capital flows are twofold. First, they can magnify welfare losses due to distorted consumption and production patterns; and second, they can lead to bankruptcies and output losses if capital suddenly flows back out again. In the former case, countries will be worse off if the foreign savings are attracted into protected sectors. While trade liberalisation and structural reform in most capital-importing countries have made this concern less relevant today, ill-regulated financial sectors have often created credit boom distortions that foreign flows have magnified.

As to the risk of sudden withdrawal, the bankers’ adage that “it is not speed that hurts, but the sudden stop” was more than validated in the Asian crisis, with widespread bankruptcies, defunct local credit channels and obsolete human capital. The larger the real devaluation needed to accommodate swings in capital flows, the deeper will be the ensuing financial turmoil.

How then do these benefit and risk channels relate to specific types of capital flows? It is often maintained that distinguishing between types of flows generates little policy insight, for essentially two reasons. First, capital flows are said to be fungible. That would imply, for example, that we could not discern any difference between the impact of foreign direct investment or short-term debt flows on private or government consumption. Second, it has been argued that capital-flow labels have become meaningless in the presence of derivatives or efforts to circumvent capital controls. These claims, however, ignore the evidence that has been emerging.

It now appears that FDI, long-term bank lending (often long-term project loans in syndicated lending) and short-term trade credits are less reversible than portfolio and short-term bank credit flows. Moreover, the more stable flows are mostly tied to particular investments and users, financing real assets. Short-term bank lending and portfolio flows, by contrast, constitute only an indirect link between foreign savings and domestic investment. In other words, these forms of financing can spill over into unsustainable consumer spending bubbles.

A recent study by Marcelo Soto at the OECD Development Centre explored the growth effect of various categories of private capital flows in a sample covering 44 developing countries over the period 1986-97. As expected and in line with earlier studies, the paper shows that foreign direct investment – with a lag of one year – significantly boosts per capita income growth in the recipient economy. In fact, a ten-percentage point rise in the FDI-GNP ratio would increase the long-run steady-state income level by 3% and short-term per capita income by 1%.

Perhaps surprisingly, the most important growth impact was found to flow from portfolio equity flows. The reasons are clear: these flows loosen the constraining effects of local financial conditions and can spur growth in dynamic industries. Equity flows also stimulate the liquidity of domestic stock markets, improving resource allocation and lowering capital cost to high-return activities.

Bonds, by contrast, did not produce any significant impact on growth in the study, and foreign bank lending – short-term and long-term – was found to undermine future per capita income growth in recipient countries, unless local banks were sufficiently capitalised.

This result confirms earlier hunches: under-capitalised banks tend to engage in excessive risk taking in a gamble to earn their way out of difficulties. And to stem the decline in risk-weighted capital ratios, banks will increase their exposure to government liabilities or other zero-risk weighted assets. But good risks, by contrast, remain under-financed and growth prospects undermined. Foreign bank lending intensifies these two distortions. Which is why, in a downturn, the resulting misallocation of resources and weak bank balance sheets intensifies credit slumps and widespread bankruptcies.

The conclusion of all this has to be that authorities are right to encourage capital inflows. And equity investment and FDI are preferable to debt instruments. This does not mean that developing countries should raise fiscal and other incentives or lower their labour and environmental standards to attract FDI; the aim should rather be to encourage transparent and predictable rules, provide the necessary infrastructure and avoid macroeconomic extravagancies. Avoiding protracted import substitution, educating people and reducing distortions, in wealth distribution for instance, have been shown to maximise FDI’s benefits. Moreover, FDI flows cannot easily be reversed in the short term.

How can these FDI and portfolio inflows be stimulated? Reforms, like abolishing foreign ownership limits and caps on voting rights, raising accounting and disclosure standards and providing instruments for hedging foreign exchange risks, would help, as would providing further liquidity in secondary markets to attract funds. Portfolio equity flows can drive up asset price inflation, and this may require more regulatory attention with respect to bank system exposure, corporate disclosure and accounting standards and liquidity requirements for market makers. Finally, foreign savings in the form of foreign bank lending will contribute to growth only if the banking system is well capitalised. Until that happens, lending will be drawn towards the “bad” risks, while the “good” risks that developing countries need for their long-term growth will be under-financed.

References

• Oman, C., Policy Competition for Foreign Direct Investment: A Study of Competition among Governments to Attract FDI, OECD Development Centre Studies, Paris 2000.

• Soto, M., Capital Flows and Growth in Developing Countries: Recent Empirical Evidence, OECD Development Centre Technical Paper No.160, Paris 2000.

©OECD Observer, No 226/227 Summer 2001




Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q4 2017 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.3% Apr 2018 annual
Trade: +2.7% exp, +3.0% imp, Q4 2017
Unemployment: 5.4% Mar 2018
Last update: 06 Jun 2018

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Watch the webcast of the final press conference of the OECD annual ministerial meeting 2018.
  • International co-operation, inclusive growth and digitalisation lead the themes of the 2018 OECD Forum in Paris on 29-30 May, under the banner of What brings us together www.oecd.org/forum. It is held alongside the annual OECD Ministerial Council Meeting on 30-31 May, chaired this year by France with a focus on multilateralism www.oecd.org/mcm.
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • Ambassador Aleksander Surdej, Permanent Representative of Poland to the OECD, was a guest on France 24’s English-language show “The Debate”, where he discussed French President Emmanuel Macron’s speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Rousseau
  • Do you trust your government? The OECD’s How's life 2017 report finds that only 38% of people in OECD countries trust their government. How can we improve our old "Social contract?" Read more.
  • Papers show “past coming back to haunt us”: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria tells Sky News that the so-called "Paradise Papers" show a past coming back to haunt us, but one which is now being dismantled. Please watch the video.
  • When someone asks me to describe an ideal girl, in my head, she is a person who is physically and mentally independent, brave to speak her mind, treated with respect just like she treats others, and inspiring to herself and others. But I know that the reality is still so much different. By Alda, 18, on International Day of the Girl. Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Read some of the insightful remarks made at OECD Forum 2017, held on 6-7 June. OECD Forum kick-started events with a focus on inclusive growth, digitalisation, and trust, under the overall theme of Bridging Divides.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2018