Does team spirit make economic sense?

Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI)
Teamwork is as vital for successful companies as it is for successful football teams. But little attempt has been made to measure its contribution to the economy, or the cost of its absence. Perhaps it is time to pay more attention to this invisible asset.
What makes for a successful football team – star players bought at huge cost perhaps, a tough and cunning manager, or an inspiring captain? All these are important, but success will also depend, critically, on less tangible factors such as team spirit and fluent communication between the players. Only then will a player know when and how to pass the ball, as well as shoot for the goal. A good firm also needs effective management, the right tools and equipment, and well-trained staff. But, like the football team, its success will also depend on mutual trust among the staff and shared objectives. More widely, in addition to a good product the firm depends for its success on the tacit understandings which bind the company to its customers and contractual partners – the trust that the firm will honour its delivery commitments, or that quality will be maintained.Reliance on teamwork is so universal that it may pass unrecognised. Traditional economic theory allocates a place in production to physical capital, the quantity of labour, and increasingly also to the quality of labour – human capital. Yet “social capital” – made up of the networks and norms that underpin most types of economic and indeed social activity – is apparently ignored.Attention to social capital can suggest new policy solutions. For example, economists worry about markets failing when one of the parties to a transaction is better informed than the other. If someone tries to sell me a used car, how do I know if its curious rumble is a long-standing quirk, or an ominous and recent symptom? Traditional policy answers such as regulatory mechanisms (like trading standards) and investment in information (hiring a mechanic to look the car over) are costly. Social capital theory implies another simpler approach. In an atmosphere of trust, I can ask the vendor about the rumble, and rely on the answer. The honest vendor gains too, in that he or she has less need to discount prices to offset the buyer’s uncertainty over quality. This may explain the common observation that used car sales frequently take place in workplaces, where trust, backed by potential informal sanctions, represents social capital. Generalising, higher levels of social capital should increase market efficiency and lead to higher output.In recent years a stream of research has sought to define and measure the myriad ways in which established norms and social networks support and underpin social and economic activity. On the economic side, for example, the level of trust in Italian regions has been shown to be linked to the effective use of credit while local social networks have been shown to play an important role in helping people to find jobs in many European countries.Another strand of research connects social capital with non-economic outcomes, including better health, education, government and child welfare, and lower crime. A major US study argues that the physical health of someone who belongs to no social group and then joins one will improve so much that his risk of dying will be cut in half, while research in Sweden suggests that social connectedness reduces the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. This apparently magical panacea for social ills has even been shown to be connected to happiness itself.Despite enthusiasm for the concept of social capital in both academic, and increasingly in political, circles, the idea remains fraught with difficulty. The term is used to cover many different things, with some extending it to include institutions such as the legal system, although most would limit its application to informal norms and social networks. And despite tantalising indications, no one has yet been able to prove that social capital increases economic output. This could be because it has been difficult to agree on how social capital should be measured, but it might also be because economic dynamism sometimes requires, alongside team-work, the kind of tough competition and radical innovation which threaten established networks and norms. There is little research, and little consensus, on how one might go about promoting social capital, particularly in “good” forms, like helpful neighbours, rather than “bad” forms, like organised crime. As the research field matures, some of the fog should lift, and it will become easier to see where the greatest policy returns can be realised from investment in research on social capital and its measurement. So what makes for a successful society? Good people certainly, knowledge and resources, effective government, law and institutions. But also the teamwork – the social capital – that makes society more than the sum of its parts.References• The Well-being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital, OECD 2001.©OECD Observer, No 226/227, Summer 2001


Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q4 2017 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.6% May 2018 annual
Trade: +2.7% exp, +3.0% imp, Q4 2017
Unemployment: 5.4% Mar 2018
Last update: 06 Jul 2018

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Watch the webcast of the final press conference of the OECD annual ministerial meeting 2018.
  • International co-operation, inclusive growth and digitalisation lead the themes of the 2018 OECD Forum in Paris on 29-30 May, under the banner of What brings us together www.oecd.org/forum. It is held alongside the annual OECD Ministerial Council Meeting on 30-31 May, chaired this year by France with a focus on multilateralism www.oecd.org/mcm.
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • Ambassador Aleksander Surdej, Permanent Representative of Poland to the OECD, was a guest on France 24’s English-language show “The Debate”, where he discussed French President Emmanuel Macron’s speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Rousseau
  • Do you trust your government? The OECD’s How's life 2017 report finds that only 38% of people in OECD countries trust their government. How can we improve our old "Social contract?" Read more.
  • Papers show “past coming back to haunt us”: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria tells Sky News that the so-called "Paradise Papers" show a past coming back to haunt us, but one which is now being dismantled. Please watch the video.
  • When someone asks me to describe an ideal girl, in my head, she is a person who is physically and mentally independent, brave to speak her mind, treated with respect just like she treats others, and inspiring to herself and others. But I know that the reality is still so much different. By Alda, 18, on International Day of the Girl. Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Read some of the insightful remarks made at OECD Forum 2017, held on 6-7 June. OECD Forum kick-started events with a focus on inclusive growth, digitalisation, and trust, under the overall theme of Bridging Divides.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2018