Development choices

Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD)
Page 30 

Untying aid to the least developed countries of the world has been an objective at OECD for many years. Now a breakthrough has been made which could see the world’s poorest countries being able to spend more of their bilateral aid funds according to market demands, rather than those of donor governments.

Approximately US$5.5 billion, or about 70% of all bilateral official development assistance (ODA) to the least developed countries will be untied as of January 2002. This is a significant breakthrough in one of the longest (and arguably most divisive) debates the OECD has seen over the years. It means that from next year, poor countries that receive bilateral aid will be free to purchase most goods and services from third countries and not be tied to making purchases from the donor country.

Which begs the question, why tie aid in the first place? There may be several reasons. For a start, aid is a financial outflow from donor countries, which governments counter by getting recipients to put in export orders, for instance. But a more important reason appears to be the commercial advantages that businesses (and governments) in donor countries can gain by connecting contracts to procurement conditions. This protectionism of course distorts prices, often raising the cost of many goods and services by between 15-30%. On the other hand, some governments have pointed out that tying aid strengthens public and business support for the development effort. And, they argue, development assistance extends beyond a mere economic exchange, with tying aid sometimes seen as a way of communicating donors’ cultural and ethical values, and as a sign of its willingness to co-operate closely with the people in developing countries.

Echoes of protectionism, quip opponents, who see tying aid as a constraint on choice and freedom in the global marketplace. Tied aid tends to favour capital investment or high value technical expertise over smaller and more poverty-focused programmes suited to the recipient. It is a costly way of subsidising jobs in richer donor countries.

Untying aid is a more efficient way to deliver assistance, allowing recipients to spend their money on another supplier, and not necessarily from the donor country. This would lead to savings by removing those price distortions, while relieving some of the administrative burdens on both recipients and donors. And different donor programmes would be easier to co-ordinate too, since there would be less to protect.

Developing countries have pressed for untying aid for some time now. And recently in the UNCTAD X Plan of Action, they identified the issue of untying as a key test of the coherence and credibility of donors’ policies towards them. Many OECD countries have long been in favour of untying more aid as well, with attempts to reach agreement going as far back as 1969. Most member countries of the organisation’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) have gradually come round to a consensus that now sees tying as incompatible with involving developing countries in the selection, design and implementation of aid programmes and projects, for instance. They recognise that competitive firms have to be able to bid for contracts in a manner that is consistent with the free trade principles of the WTO, in particular its Agreement on Government Procurement.

Civil society will also be pleased with recent progress. A coalition of over 900 NGOs based in Europe has urged the European Commission to abolish the tied aid programmes both under the responsibility of the Commission and those of individual EU member states.

So what does the new OECD Recommendation to free up aid actually do? By 1 January 2002, ODA to the least developed countries will be untied in the following areas: balance of payments and structural adjustment support; debt forgiveness; sector and multi-sector programme assistance; investment project aid; import and commodity support; commercial services contracts, and ODA to NGOs for procurement-related activities.

The eight-page DAC Recommendation accepts that different approaches will be required for different categories of ODA. It strikes a balance between maintaining a sense of national involvement in donor countries’ development co-operation policies alongside the objective to procure on the basis of open international competition. With respect to technical co-operation and food aid, donors can opt to keep their aid programmes tied. Had this not been agreed, food aid programmes and possibly the untying process may have been jeopardised. But these categories represent only a quarter of all bilateral ODA to the least developed countries, the rest being untied. It is already clear there will be important differences between individual donors both in the amount of aid that is covered by the Recommendation and the overall volumes and shares of aid that are untied. Effort-sharing is the key word, and DAC members intend to ensure that their aid to the least developed countries will not decline as a result of untying.

Transparency, implementation and review procedures are central to the Recommendation being respected. Prior to the opening of any bidding, donors will notify the OECD of untied aid offers covered by the Recommendation. The notification will be made public. After bidding, donors will inform the OECD of the company that has been awarded the contract.

ODA has been declining from OECD countries, with most of them falling well short of the UN’s recommended target of 0.7% of GNP. Untying aid will not reverse that trend, but at least it will help to improve the effectiveness of aid.


• DAC Recommendation on Untying Official Development Assistance to the Least Developed Countries, May 2001, available at,

• OECD Policy Brief, “Untying Aid to the Least Developed Countries”, July 2001, available at,

• “Shaping the 21st Century: The Contribution of Development Co-operation”, May 1996, available at:

©OECD Observer No 228, September 2001 

Economic data


Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • When someone asks me to describe an ideal girl, in my head, she is a person who is physically and mentally independent, brave to speak her mind, treated with respect just like she treats others, and inspiring to herself and others. But I know that the reality is still so much different. By Alda, 18, on International Day of the Girl. Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Read some of the insightful remarks made at OECD Forum 2017, held on 6-7 June. OECD Forum kick-started events with a focus on inclusive growth, digitalisation, and trust, under the overall theme of Bridging Divides.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • How do the largest community of British expats living in Spain feel about Brexit? Britons living in Orihuela Costa, Alicante give their views.
  • Brexit is taking up Europe's energy and focus, according to OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría. Watch video.
  • OECD Chief Economist Catherine Mann and former Bank of England Governor Mervyn King discuss the economic merits of a US border adjustment tax and the outlook for US economic growth.
  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2017