At your service: Trade in the global economy

Trade Directorate
Page 47 

When you buy a business service online, the sales person may be half a block or half a world away. But do the same trade rules apply as when you buy a piece of solid merchandise, and who decides?

Services are a relative newcomer to the multilateral trading system, having been famously defined only as “anything you can’t drop on your foot”. Most trade negotiations over the years have focused on trade in goods, so while barriers on say, shoes or televisions, have been tumbling, services are only now beginning to be freed up. One reason that these “intangibles” were long ignored in an international trade context is that many types of service, such as business advice, were not easily exported, being rather local or national in reach.

That picture has changed enormously. Technological advance, privatisation and liberalisation have seen global trade in services rise to an estimated US$2.1 trillion annually. Even business services have spread their wings across borders, thanks to modern telecommunications. And the break-up of former state monopolies has created new cross-border opportunities for areas like telecommunications and energy. This trade is not simply for and among developed countries: the share of services in total trade has also increased in developing countries, with services accounting for approximately 30% of all world trade.

Services are a key indicator of economic development, accounting for 50-70% of economic activity, more than half of all civilian employment in most OECD countries, and underpinning many other sectors, including manufacturing. Countries at all levels of development have recognised that an inefficient services infrastructure can act as a tax on the entire economy, affecting efficiency and competitiveness, as well as physical trade.

Hard talks

It is hardly surprising that services should become the subject of multilateral trade talks. The trouble is that trying to remove barriers to services trade is as complex as services themselves, a point clearly demonstrated by the international negotiations under the WTO General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), which began on 1 January, 2000.

Technological change – sometimes blurring the differences between goods and services – the wide range of state and private sector suppliers, monopolies and markets, unilateral liberalisation in some state-owned monopolies, like telecoms: all of this makes for a complex global marketplace and an equally fast-changing regulatory landscape.

The GATS provides a framework of rules for global trade in services and a structure for multilateral commitments to liberalise. But the GATS has yet to deliver real market opening – most countries’ GATS commitments represented the status quo at the time of the Uruguay Round a decade ago. Meanwhile, thanks to technological change and unilateral liberalisation, most countries’ markets are in fact significantly more open than their GATS requirements indicate. Translating this into multilateral commitments is a major challenge of the current negotiations.

Progress in the GATS negotiations will not be easy, not least because of the sheer number of issues involved. Market access negotiations in services cover sectors as diverse as energy and telecommunications, transport and computer services. Already more than 90 negotiating proposals have been received from some 40 WTO members, with more to come. Some particularly sensitive sectors where little progress has been made so far – maritime transport, audio-visual services (with its cultural dimension reflected in some countries’ desire to protect their own language) and the movement of service suppliers (so-called “mode 4” of the GATS) – remain firmly on the table. Expectations of progress on mode 4 in particular are running high, with some developing countries indicating that their willingness to deepen commitments under other modes (such as mode 3 on commercial presence) may lessen if they do not receive increased access for their service suppliers.

In addition to market access negotiations, there is a significant agenda of rules issues left over from the Uruguay Round, covering rules on subsidies, government procurement, qualification requirements, technical standards, licensing and the like. One question stands out – that of a possible emergency safeguard mechanism to allow members to temporarily suspend a commitment where a surge of imports is causing unforeseen damage to domestic industry.

But the terms “damage”, “domestic industry” and even “imports” are much more difficult to define for services than for goods. Some major developed countries query the feasibility and desirability of a safeguard, but some developing countries may refuse to make significant market access commitments without one. The deadline for these negotiations has recently been extended to March 2002.

Broader negotiations

Apart from the technical difficulties, there are the politics. After the failure at Seattle to launch a broad trade round, only negotiations on agriculture and services already agreed under the “built-in agenda” were allowed to proceed.

While these two negotiations are formally separate, politically they are linked as some agricultural exporting countries in particular are reluctant to deliver liberalisation on services without an indication of similar progress in, say, market access for food. Most WTO members see little prospect of real results from the services negotiations in the absence of a broader negotiating agenda to provide the trade-offs and gains that allow multilateral trade deals to be struck.

In the meantime, services negotiations are taking place against the backdrop of concern about liberalisation and globalisation. Some people are anxious about the provision of public services like health and education and wonder about their governments’ ability to pursue national policy objectives within a global environment. While services supplied in the exercise of governmental authority are excluded from the GATS, most countries now have a mix of private and public sector provision, in health and education for instance. Services liberalisation also presents new challenges for regulation.

Contrary to some critics’ suggestion, “liberalisation” and “deregulation” are not synonyms. Indeed, services liberalisation often necessitates regulation or re-regulation, as governments try to achieve a range of policy objectives within new market structures. After all, governments still have to ensure competitive markets, safeguard consumer interests, improve environmental protection and, in areas like health and education, ensure universal provision.

Dialogue and debate are needed on these important issues. The OECD will contribute to this dialogue via its forthcoming study, Open Services Markets Matter, which addresses these concerns and balances the costs and benefits of liberalising services.

The road ahead for the services negotiations will be long and difficult. True, unilateral and regional liberalisation will probably continue and the global market will grow. But multilateral progress will be vital to spread the benefits of better, more efficient services to all consumers.

Services might not drop on your foot, but failing to achieve progress multilaterally could leave some service-starved countries limping on the sidelines of regional and bilateral deals and struggling in the global economy.


• OECD, Open Services Markets Matter, forthcoming.

• See also “Prepare for the global e-campus”, by D. Hirsch, p. 57.

©OECD Observer No 229, November 2001

Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q1 2019 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.3% May 2019 annual
Trade: +0.4% exp, -1.2% imp, Q1 2019
Unemployment: 5.2% July 2019
Last update: 8 July 2019

OECD Observer Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Subscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To order your own paper editions,email

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • MCM logo
  • The following communiqué and Chair’s statement were issued at the close of the OECD Council Meeting at Ministerial level, this year presided by the Slovak Republic.
  • Food production will suffer some of the most immediate and brutal effects of climate change, with some regions of the world suffering far more than others. Only through unhindered global trade can we ensure that high-quality, nutritious food reaches those who need it most, Angel Gurría, Secretary-General of the OECD, and José Graziano da Silva, Director-General of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, write in their latest Project Syndicate article. Read the article here.
  • Globalisation will continue and get stronger, and how to harness it is the great challenge, says OECD Secretary-General Gurría on Bloomberg TV. Watch the interview here.
  • OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría with UN Secretary-General António Guterres at the 73rd Session of the UN General Assembly, in New York City.
  • The new OECD Observer Crossword, with Myles Mellor. Try it online!
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2019