Quality healthcare: what consumers want

Page 32 

David Rooney

All people are consumers of health services. It is about time they were treated as such. Only then will quality be improved.

A few years ago I was invited to a South Asia/Pacific regional conference in India to speak about the approach to quality being taken by the organised health consumer movement in Australia. I was apprehensive about the task. Most of the countries represented were developing countries and many of them were reputed to have poor access to even elementary healthcare. Why would they be interested in our views of quality? And even if they were interested, how useful would the results of consultations with consumers in Australia be in their diverse settings?

My concerns were unfounded. It became quickly apparent that consumers and public health workers in developing economies had no intention of making the mistakes we have made in OECD countries. As they see it, we have worked for access and availability at the cost of quality. They intend to work for access to quality.

The people at that conference shared the issues that we had found in our consultations in Australia. Users of health services want safe, appropriate interventions, treatment and care. We want to be treated with dignity and respect.

We want information that is accurate, timely and relevant. We believe that if this is to happen then consumers must be involved and consulted, not only in relation to their own healthcare, but also about service planning and delivery, health evaluation and research.

To say that patients want safe, appropriate treatment is most obvious. We have all heard stories of the surgeon who performed very successful surgery, but amputated the wrong leg or removed the healthy kidney. Many errors are avoided because of intervention or questioning by a consumer or carer. Errors increase when we are not heard.

At a recent enquiry in my locality, it transpired that two daughters of a patient questioned the blood that was about to be transfused as not being the same as their mother¡¦s blood type. Their concerns were ignored and the patient died. Aside from sanctions and litigation, who really is affected by such an error? The consumer. Health professionals often argue that consumers are not in a position to make judgements about technical competence. Maybe so. But if we judge technical competence by outcomes, then surely consumers are the best judges. Yet who currently designs the performance indicators?

And who is to judge whether there has been dignity and respect in the treatment and care process? Surely, only the consumer. Only consumers can determine whether they have received information that meets their needs.

The closest most health services come to measuring these consumer experiences is the occasional satisfaction survey. But I have yet to see a health service that encourages complaints and fully uses them as a quality improvement tool. Targeting a reduction in complaints is not a sign of improvement. What is needed is an effective evaluation of the accessibility of complaints procedures and the introduction of incentives, such as feedback and proof of real action, to encourage and support complaints.

It is difficult when we are sick and vulnerable, to be faced with a health professional who, at least in our perception, has greater knowledge and power. Alas! Consumers have no professional or employment base from which to lobby for their interests. So to participate as equal partners they need to be able to consult, to develop policy and strategies and to train for their advocacy role. At that conference in India participants from developing and developed countries agreed that consumers, through their organisations, should have the resources to participate in all health planning and research. Only then will we stand a fighting chance of creating quality health services.

* Janne Graham is a consumer representative and a former chairperson of Australia¡¦s unique national health consumer organisation, Consumers¡¦ Health Forum. Ms Graham has recently recovered from an iatrogenic condition (pulmonary oedema/cardiac failure) following admission for cellulitis.

References

• Graham, J. D., "India in December: A Report on a Consumers' International Consultation", Health Forum No. 40, February 1997.

 Parker, M., "The Ethics of Evidence-based Patient Choice", Health Expectations, June 2001.

©OECD Observer No 229, November 2001 




Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • “Nizip” refugee camp visit
    July 2016: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría visits the “Nizip” refugee camp, situated between Gaziantep and the Turkish-Syrian border, accompanied by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek. The camp accommodates a small number of the 2.75 million Syrians currently registered in Turkey, mostly outside the camps. In his tour of the camp, Mr Gurría visits a school, speaks with refugees and gives a short interview.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • Queen Maxima of the Netherlands gives a speech next to Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto (not pictured) during the International Forum of Financial Inclusion at the National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico June 21, 2016.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • OECD Environment Director Simon Upton presented a talk at Imperial College London on 21 April 2016. With the world awash in surplus oil and prices languishing around US$40 per barrel, how can governments step up efforts to transform the world’s energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement?
  • Happy 10th birthday to Twitter. This 2008 OECD Observer interview with Henry Copeland said you’d do well.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Once migrants reach Europe, countries face integration challenge: OECD's Thomas Liebig speaks to NPR's Audie Cornish.

  • Message from the International Space Station to COP21

  • COP21 Will Get Agreement With Teeth: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría on Bloomberg

  • The carbon clock is ticking: OECD’s Gurría on CNBC

  • If we want to reach zero net emissions by the end of the century, we must align our policies for a low-carbon economy, put a price on carbon everywhere, spend less subsidising fossil fuels and invest more in clean energy. OECD at #COP21 – OECD statement for #COP21
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa. blogs.worldbank.org
  • Pole to Paris Project
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • How can cities fight climate change?
    Discover projects in Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan and Mexico.
  • Climate: What's changed, what hasn't, what we can do about it.
    Lecture by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, hosted by the London School of Economics and Aviva Investors in association with ClimateWise, London, UK, 3 July 2015.

  • Climate change: “We should not disagree when scientists tell us we have a window of opportunity–10-15 years–to turn this thing around” argues Senator Bernie Sanders.

  • In the long-run, the EU benefits from migration, says OECD Head of International Migration Division Jean-Christophe Dumont.
  • Is technological progress slowing down? Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on www.ft.com.
  • Catherine Mann, OECD Chief Economist, explains on Bloomberg why "too much bank lending can slow economic growth".
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .

Most Popular Articles

Poll

What issue are you most concerned about in 2016?

Unemployment
Euro crisis
International conflict
Global warming
Other

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2016