The Dutch model

Page 44 

Drawing by Ruairi O Brien (

With medical professionals and institutions responsible for devising their own separate quality systems, achieving a coherent quality framework for the Netherlands is proving a harder job than many had bargained for.

A report by the World Health Organisation in 2000 ranked the Netherlands 17th in the world for the quality of its health services. The OECD too has scrutinised the Dutch healthcare system and several reports comparing the Dutch situation with other countries have been produced in the Netherlands. All of them have sparked much debate in the Dutch press and among academic circles.

There is no doubt that benchmarking has put the question of performance indicators for health systems on the Dutch political agenda. But the indicators these studies have used, like disability-adjusted life expectancy or fairness in financial contribution, do not really address the acutely felt problems in the Dutch healthcare system, such as waiting times and labour shortages. So while interesting, these international indicators lack a strong link with national policy and decision-making frameworks in the Netherlands.

More energy should be channelled into filling these gaps, for when it comes to developing such indicators, the Netherlands is lagging behind countries like the US, Canada and Australia. One reason is the different approaches the Netherlands has chosen for monitoring its healthcare system, which can be characterised as a self-regulating system within which public and private elements are intertwined.

After a decade of planning regulations, like health manpower and budgets, healthcare policy shifted towards a regulated market in the second half of the 1980s. A nationwide emphasis was placed on the quality of care.

Over a decade ago, in 1989, the first national broad-based conference on quality in healthcare was held. Participants agreed that healthcare professionals - doctors, nurses and other personnel - and institutions such as hospitals and nursing homes, should each develop "quality systems" of their own. They agreed these systems would be used to achieve improvements in quality as well as external accountability; that patient organisations and financiers (municipalities, public and private insurers) would be involved in devising the quality system; and that the government would enforce these policies, with the inspectorate of health exerting control.

Legislation followed in 1991 and in the last decade many initiatives were taken to enforce already existing quality assurance mechanisms, or to introduce new ones. The drive to develop quality systems among professionals comes from both internal and external pressures. Work includes formalised training programmes, accreditation of courses, and the introduction of obligatory re-licensing for the medical professions (since 1989). It also includes plans to introduce national practice guideline programmes for medical specialists, general practitioners and nursing professions; peer review and audit programmes for these groups and others, like nursing home physicians and specialists in social medicine; and to develop clinical registries by scientific societies.

Healthcare institutions, on the other hand, have been more active in applying new systems, like the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) model, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) model and the North American Accreditation model. In 2000, two-thirds of the institutional healthcare providers were involved in project-based quality improvement. A third were preparing for the implementation of a comprehensive, coherent quality system.

A conference on quality in 2000 endorsed the principle of self-regulation, but saw the danger of a divide emerging between professionals and institutions instead of more integrated care arrangements. Present legislation and financing structures reinforce this divide, treating prevention, cure and social care as separate entities. Yet the need for integrated care is recognised. For instance, Dutch healthcare is financed through a mix of private and public insurance schemes. The public schemes are regulated through the Sick Fund Law (ZWF), covering most of the treatment (or curative) sector (e.g. hospitals, physicians) and prescription drugs, and the Catastrophic Illness Act (AWBZ), covering most of the care (e.g. nursing homes, homes for the elderly, home care). Now there are proposals to merge the AWBZ and ZWF under one basic insurance package for treatment and care.

In terms of monitoring by means of performance indicators, one of the major challenges ahead will be to link public health data with the performance data of individual services in a meaningful way. A prerequisite is that health services and professionals become more community oriented. But this will be difficult to achieve under the self-regulation model where financial and legislative incentives work in opposite directions. Governments must therefore provide guidance towards the overall goals of healthcare, take initiatives to safeguard coherence in the system and assure that it is population-based, instead of service-based.

Linking public health data with performance data on health services and professions begs several questions: for instance, do we provide the optimal mix of services to our population and are these services provided effectively, efficiently, in a client-oriented manner?

We have to develop performance indicators for healthcare institutes and professions that are community-based. These national performance indicators have to be placed in a quality system framework. In other words, for national indicators to be meaningful for policy and management, they will have to be part and parcel of a quality system for healthcare as a whole. The WHO 2000 report helped to reorient the focus of the Dutch healthcare system. It is now time to take the next step and develop an integrated, policy-friendly, national performance framework.


 Casparie, A.F., Sluijs, E.M., Wagner, C., de Bakker, D.H., "Quality systems in Dutch Health Care Institutions", Health Policy, December 1997.

 Kramers, G.N., Achterberg, P.W., van der Wilk, E.A., "De prestaties van de Nederlandse Gezondheidszorg in internationaal perspectief: achtergronden en implicaties voor beleid", Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (145), 36, 2001.

 Klazinga, N., Stronks, K., Delnoij, D., Verhoeff, A., "Indicators Without a Cause. Reflections on the development and use of indicators in health care from a public health perspective", The International Journal for Quality in Health Care.

 Klazinga, N., Lombarts, K., Van Everdingen, J., "Quality Management in Medical Specialties: the use of channels and dikes in improving health care in The Netherlands", Jt Comm J Qual Improv, May 1998.

 Sluijs, E.M., Wagner, C., "Kwaliteitssystemen in zorginstellingen", Stand van zaken in 2000, Utrecht: Nivel, 2000.

 "Health Systems: Improving Performance", World Health Report 2000, Geneva, WHO, 2000.

©OECD Observer No 229, November 2001 

Economic data


Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • “Nizip” refugee camp visit
    July 2016: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría visits the “Nizip” refugee camp, situated between Gaziantep and the Turkish-Syrian border, accompanied by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek. The camp accommodates a small number of the 2.75 million Syrians currently registered in Turkey, mostly outside the camps. In his tour of the camp, Mr Gurría visits a school, speaks with refugees and gives a short interview.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • Queen Maxima of the Netherlands gives a speech next to Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto (not pictured) during the International Forum of Financial Inclusion at the National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico June 21, 2016.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • OECD Environment Director Simon Upton presented a talk at Imperial College London on 21 April 2016. With the world awash in surplus oil and prices languishing around US$40 per barrel, how can governments step up efforts to transform the world’s energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement?
  • Happy 10th birthday to Twitter. This 2008 OECD Observer interview with Henry Copeland said you’d do well.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Once migrants reach Europe, countries face integration challenge: OECD's Thomas Liebig speaks to NPR's Audie Cornish.

  • Message from the International Space Station to COP21

  • The carbon clock is ticking: OECD’s Gurría on CNBC

  • If we want to reach zero net emissions by the end of the century, we must align our policies for a low-carbon economy, put a price on carbon everywhere, spend less subsidising fossil fuels and invest more in clean energy. OECD at #COP21 – OECD statement for #COP21
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa.
  • Pole to Paris Project
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • How can cities fight climate change?
    Discover projects in Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan and Mexico.
  • Climate: What's changed, what hasn't, what we can do about it.
    Lecture by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, hosted by the London School of Economics and Aviva Investors in association with ClimateWise, London, UK, 3 July 2015.
  • Is technological progress slowing down? Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .

Most Popular Articles


What issue are you most concerned about in 2016?

Euro crisis
International conflict
Global warming

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2016