Prepare for the global e-campus

Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI)
Page 57 

There has been much talk but precious little action about the coming of “virtual learning”. This might be about to change, although challenges remain.

Log on to www.cardean.edu from anywhere in the world, and you can enrol in a business, management or accounting course from a university partnered by a consortium of prestigious institutions from Stanford to the London School of Economics. In the course of your studies, you will not have to leave your desk – because all of Cardean University’s courses are fully online. This is the most respectable-looking of a new breed of virtual universities, whose prospectuses and student bodies are modest so far, but whose potential as multinational purveyors of learning is mind-boggling. Will we soon all be taking our degrees on the web? And does this mean that, 24 centuries after Plato’s Academy, the days of the physical campus are numbered?

The 1990s witnessed plenty of talk and relatively little action, both about the coming of “virtual learning” and about the export of educational services. Many existing higher education institutions started to use electronic media to support their programmes, without changing their underlying structure. Truly virtual courses tended to be experimental, small scale or of dubious quality.

But representatives of OECD governments meeting with e-learning experts in Tokyo recently noted that in the past two years virtual learning has started to take off. It seems that three trends are converging to bring a global virtual education economy closer to reality.

First, the technical possibilities of the Internet and related technologies now make it possible to deliver high quality courses, largely or even entirely, online. Education observers have been impressed by the very high quality of the platform created by Cardean, albeit at enormous cost.

Second, radical changes in who participates in higher education, and why, have created pressure for equally radical change in what is provided, and how. Gone are the days when students were primarily a minority of the population in their late teens and early 20s, studying full-time for bachelor degrees. Universities in many countries have expanded part-time study, created new modes of off-site learning, often in partnership with business, and introduced more flexible forms of credit transfer. Yet existing universities still tend to be oriented around their long-established features: the campus, the faculty, the term or semester, the annual admission of a fresh batch of young undergraduates. The founding of entirely new institutions without recognisable campuses could herald a more fundamental shake-up.

Third, some countries are belatedly realising that international trade in educational services could become a significant force. The biggest component of such trade to date has been study overseas; now e-learning opens up new prospects of consumers who stay in their own countries and import a wide range of services from foreign suppliers. The US has placed the removal of trade restrictions in education on the table in the GATS negotiations on liberalisation of trade in services.

This intersection of technological, educational and trading developments is still a long way from creating a serious threat to national education systems, even if each element of the mix is growing fast. Take e-learning. A survey last year found that 57% of Canadian universities already offer online courses, with 3 000 offered in total. In other countries only a minority do, but growth is rapid: only one in four Dutch universities currently provide electronic learning environments, but 90% say they have plans to do so.

The physical link between campus and student is already being broken. One in seven students enrolled at Australian universities are described as “external”: attendance is incidental or voluntary. On the trade front, education is at least the fifth largest sector of internationally traded service in the US, yet most trade in educational services still involves physical travel by foreign students, while most e-learning remains domestic. The multinational virtual university remains a dream, of which Cardean is so far only a prototype.

Many national government representatives meeting in Tokyo were nevertheless worried about what lies ahead. The US is well positioned to export educational services – its student-testing industry, for example, has already become a serious international business – and there is little prospect of a threat to its own domestic provision from outside. But smaller countries fear cultural domination and loss of control over a service that governments regard as a crucial tool in influencing how their societies develop. Even the US has agreed that primary and secondary education will be off limits in GATS, but some countries worry too about foreign intrusion into degree or diploma courses at colleges and universities.

Looking ahead, several key issues would need to be resolved for exported e-learning to take off in a big way. Quality control and accreditation is crucial. Students need to know not just the intrinsic worth of the course they are buying, but also how it will be regarded, particularly by employers. Countries already accredit domestic institutions, and recognised national qualifications ensure that student learning is recognised and valued by others. All this becomes a lot harder when it comes to overseas providers, particularly those that have no physical presence in a country. International accreditation is in its infancy – one of the more prominent bodies with this mission, the Global Alliance for Transnational Education, has so far recognised only four institutions.

Another closely-related issue is protectionism. The GATS negotiations will need to confront a range of measures taken by countries to keep out education imports, including direct legislation and policy, refusal to recognise foreign credentials, telecommunications laws, and restrictions on movement of people. This means confronting a fundamental motivation: the desire to keep control of one’s own education system.

Governments need to become clearer about exactly what public objectives they wish to retain for education systems, and recognise the huge scope for private services to be provided beyond this, whether from home or foreign suppliers.

A basic question about e-learning has to be answered before it can compete seriously with face-to-face study. Is it good value for money? Initially it was assumed that teaching thousands of people via intelligent software was bound to bring huge savings over using real teachers in classrooms. Today, it is widely recognised that study can only be effective if it includes some level of human interaction – whether by email or at least some direct contact between student and teacher. Moreover, the fixed cost of setting up a really high quality e-learning platform can be huge – Cardean’s set-up costs were in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Therefore, the winners will be those who can sell services on a truly global scale. The need initially to tap premium revenue sources with courses such as MBAs and corporate management training may delay the day that virtual universities start to compete seriously with other provision for undergraduates.

Finally, issues of intellectual property are coming ever more to the fore. When in April 2001, MIT announced that it will be putting all of its course materials on the Internet, its stated aim was to counter a trend towards privatising knowledge. It also said that the materials were not in themselves courses; but those who do try to sell courses online may find it hard to protect their products from some forms of piracy. At best, this may help keep out products that simply dump materials on students without giving individualised support. But at worst it could limit the willingness of leading academics to sell their wisdom to online providers, fearing that endless duplication might devalue the currency of their own intellectual contribution, as well as that of the prestigious institutions where they teach. The OECD’s Tokyo meeting heard important warnings against “cyperbole”: the tendency to exaggerate the degree to which electronic communications will change the world. E-learning is as far today from challenging campus education as educational imports are from threatening the far greater volume of within-border learning. Yet there is no doubt that both these phenomena exist and are growing rapidly. Education ministers are keen to keep a close eye on them: meeting in Paris earlier this year, they requested that the OECD monitor developments and report back. The eyes of many governments will be watching this space, whether with excitement or with trepidation. Cyperbole may have its merits: at least the issue is now seriously on the agenda.

References

 See also “At your service: Trade in the global economy”, by J. Nielson, p. 47.

 E-learning, the Partnership Challenge, OECD, 2001; order it at http://www.oecd.org/bookshop/

 Knowledge Management in the Learning Society, OECD, 2000.

 Cities and Regions in the New Learning Economy, OECD, 2001.

©OECD Observer No 229, November 2001 




Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q4 2017 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.6% May 2018 annual
Trade: +2.7% exp, +3.0% imp, Q4 2017
Unemployment: 5.4% Mar 2018
Last update: 06 Jul 2018

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Watch the webcast of the final press conference of the OECD annual ministerial meeting 2018.
  • International co-operation, inclusive growth and digitalisation lead the themes of the 2018 OECD Forum in Paris on 29-30 May, under the banner of What brings us together www.oecd.org/forum. It is held alongside the annual OECD Ministerial Council Meeting on 30-31 May, chaired this year by France with a focus on multilateralism www.oecd.org/mcm.
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • Ambassador Aleksander Surdej, Permanent Representative of Poland to the OECD, was a guest on France 24’s English-language show “The Debate”, where he discussed French President Emmanuel Macron’s speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Rousseau
  • Do you trust your government? The OECD’s How's life 2017 report finds that only 38% of people in OECD countries trust their government. How can we improve our old "Social contract?" Read more.
  • Papers show “past coming back to haunt us”: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria tells Sky News that the so-called "Paradise Papers" show a past coming back to haunt us, but one which is now being dismantled. Please watch the video.
  • When someone asks me to describe an ideal girl, in my head, she is a person who is physically and mentally independent, brave to speak her mind, treated with respect just like she treats others, and inspiring to herself and others. But I know that the reality is still so much different. By Alda, 18, on International Day of the Girl. Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Read some of the insightful remarks made at OECD Forum 2017, held on 6-7 June. OECD Forum kick-started events with a focus on inclusive growth, digitalisation, and trust, under the overall theme of Bridging Divides.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2018