End of an affair?

Spotlight on Corporate Governance
OECD Observer

An opinion poll in BusinessWeek magazine shows half of the US believing that what is good for business is not necessarily good for their country. Hardly surprising, you might think – except that the poll was carried out over two years ago, before the high-tech bubble burst and well before the recent corporate scandals. And the fact that the opinion poll was in one of the US’s main pro-business magazines meant that the results simply had to be taken seriously.

They were also quite unexpected. The BusinessWeek poll was wide-ranging, with respondents asked to agree or disagree with several given statements. The one that made the headlines was simple: in general, what is good for business is good for most Americans. Some 47% of respondents agreed with that statement, but 49% disagreed. This was much more negative than the previous poll conducted in 1996, when just 28% felt their interests and those of business were not necessarily the same. Another finding to ruffle corporate plumes in the 2000 survey was that 72% of respondents agreed that business had gained too much power over too many aspects of American life.

It was not all bad news for corporate America. Indeed, 68% of respondents agreed that American business should be given most of the credit for the prosperity that prevailed during most of the 1990s. However, one question might make worse reading if the poll was conducted today: when asked how much confidence they had in those running big business, only 19% had a lot of confidence, though as many as 58% had at least some.

Opinion polls have their limits, though the BusinessWeek survey at least suggests that, probably because of a backlash against globalisation as demonstrated at Seattle in 1999, the public image of corporate America was looking tarnished well before the scandals that erupted at Andersen, Enron and elsewhere. These scandals appear to have transformed that disillusion into a crisis of confidence.

Is it the end of the affair between America’s public and its business world? Probably not, though a more demanding public will mean the relationship may never be quite the same again. There is a coincidental footnote to add to this story: the issue of BusinessWeek in which this rather astonishing opinion poll appeared was dated 11 September, 2000.

• "Business Week/Harris Poll: How Business Rates: By the Numbers" in BusinessWeek, 11 September, 2000.

©OECD Observer No 234, October 2002

Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q3 2017 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.3% Dec 2017 annual
Trade: +4.3% exp, +4.3% imp, Q3 2017
Unemployment: 5.5% Dec 2017
Last update: 12 Feb 2018


Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Ambassador Aleksander Surdej, Permanent Representative of Poland to the OECD, was a guest on France 24’s English-language show “The Debate”, where he discussed French President Emmanuel Macron’s speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Rousseau
  • Do you trust your government? The OECD’s How's life 2017 report finds that only 38% of people in OECD countries trust their government. How can we improve our old "Social contract?" Read more.
  • Papers show “past coming back to haunt us”: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria tells Sky News that the so-called "Paradise Papers" show a past coming back to haunt us, but one which is now being dismantled. Please watch the video.
  • When someone asks me to describe an ideal girl, in my head, she is a person who is physically and mentally independent, brave to speak her mind, treated with respect just like she treats others, and inspiring to herself and others. But I know that the reality is still so much different. By Alda, 18, on International Day of the Girl. Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Read some of the insightful remarks made at OECD Forum 2017, held on 6-7 June. OECD Forum kick-started events with a focus on inclusive growth, digitalisation, and trust, under the overall theme of Bridging Divides.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2018