Weigh up the costs and the benefits

OECD Observer
Page 30 

When it comes to assessing regulation and safety with regard to particular goods, cost-benefit analysis does not receive the emphasis it should, particularly when compared with the importance of pure risk analysis. The Uruguay Round agreements (see p. 28) give economic assessment only a limited role in the settlement of sanitary and technical disputes. In fact, there is no requirement in the SPS agreement that the economic benefits of any regulatory measures must outweigh the costs. Yet it is becoming clear that some regulatory measures can have net economic drawbacks. To use the terminology of cost-benefit analysis, they have a negative effect on society’s welfare – or well-being – even if the measures reduce risk.

It would be paradoxical if international standards resulted in more trade but a lower level of well-being. Good regulatory practice requires that any regulation be assessed for the bene-fits it offers, and the costs it imposes. Many countries introduce import restrictions on sanitary grounds, such as to avoid the spread of pests, without making any prior estimate of potential losses, which may be very small in comparison with the cost the regulation imposes on industry and consumers. If cost-benefit analysis were used more often, the welfare gains resulting from the regulations could be compared with the welfare gains resulting from freer trade, for example.

In other words, cost-benefit analysis can help public authorities to take better decisions about their national regulations. One study re-commends that the method should be used systematically, since very considerable differences were observed between the cost of public health measures and their real impact on health. For example, the cost per life saved varied between $200,000 and $10,000,000 depending on the programme, which means that more lives could be saved at the same cost to society. Even though society does not accept all risks in the same way, and even though social choices cannot be reduced to comparing the cost of different programmes, cost-benefit analysis is an important stage in the framing of regulations. In fact, it is mandatory for projects of a certain size in the healthcare sector in the United States (Executive Order 12291, 1981).

Methods based on estimates of the cost of illness or the cost of shortened human life may also be used to assess the benefit of regulations. These costs can then be compared with those of sanitary regulations. In practice, this raises many technical and methodological problems. For example, estimates of cancer risk from pesticide residues contain a substantial degree of uncertainty, making any economic estimate particularly difficult. In addition, it is not possible to calculate risk where there is too much uncertainty, making it difficult to carry out analysis with conventional tools. This is the case with the risk of genetically modified organisms propagating genes, or the risk of long-term epidemics, such as any associated with mad cow disease.

Measuring the benefits procured by regulations designed to guarantee certain ethical or cultural aspects of product quality is no easy matter either. Nor is the valuation of imagined risk. However, it may be possible to measure a situation where consumers place particular value on the fact that a good is produced without the use of biotechnology or irradiation, for example, and then estimate their willingness to pay. That would be a good way of showing in money terms how consumer satisfaction would respond to regulations prohibiting the techniques.

©OECD Observer No 216, March 1999

Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q1 2019 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.3% May 2019 annual
Trade: +0.4% exp, -1.2% imp, Q1 2019
Unemployment: 5.2% July 2019
Last update: 8 July 2019

OECD Observer Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Subscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To order your own paper editions,email Observer@OECD.org

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • MCM logo
  • The following communiqué and Chair’s statement were issued at the close of the OECD Council Meeting at Ministerial level, this year presided by the Slovak Republic.
  • Food production will suffer some of the most immediate and brutal effects of climate change, with some regions of the world suffering far more than others. Only through unhindered global trade can we ensure that high-quality, nutritious food reaches those who need it most, Angel Gurría, Secretary-General of the OECD, and José Graziano da Silva, Director-General of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, write in their latest Project Syndicate article. Read the article here.
  • Globalisation will continue and get stronger, and how to harness it is the great challenge, says OECD Secretary-General Gurría on Bloomberg TV. Watch the interview here.
  • OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría with UN Secretary-General António Guterres at the 73rd Session of the UN General Assembly, in New York City.
  • The new OECD Observer Crossword, with Myles Mellor. Try it online!
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2019