Energising change

Secretary-General of the OECD

Energy has moved to the top of our policy agendas, and with good reason. First, there is the price of oil, which though easing a little in recent months, remains historically high. This has pushed up costs for producers and consumers alike.

Second, there is the security of supply, as conflicts and geopolitical uncertainties threaten oil and gas flows in particular.

But the main reason for our wake-up call on energy is global warming. We now know that greenhouse gas emissions from transport and power generation are partly responsible for this fact.

Energy is the heartbeat of growth and development, and is a globalisation issue par excellence. Over 70% of new energy demand in the next 25 years will come from developing countries, a third of that in China, but economic activity in developed countries will remain a major source of emissions. Devising new energy strategies for our world will demand international co-operation which the OECD must help forge. What are the steps forward?

The recent Stern Report, commissioned by the UK government, argued that climate change, if left unchecked, would cost between 5% and 20% of worldwide GDP. However, the report said it would cost just 1% of GDP to correct. Another report by PricewaterhouseCoopers in September came to a similar conclusion. The International Energy Agency, a sister body of the OECD, in its latest World Energy Outlook, also warns of the dangers of following our current energy path and considers different policy scenarios.

We may all differ on precise numbers, but the task remains the same. As the IEA puts it, our global energy situation is vulnerable, dirty and expensive. Fortunately, as OECD and IEA work shows, we have the tools to make energy smarter, cleaner and cost-effective. New strategies are affordable, but will only work if we embark on them without delay.

Looking for options gives rise to passionate debates, about the car industry, nuclear energy, markets, taxation and regulation. There is excitement over renewable energy technologies, not least because of the business opportunities these provide.

Listening to the arguments and sizing up the facts is one of our main jobs at the OECD, so that we can help governments decide how to proceed. Our message to all sides is simple: renewable energy technologies are not a panacea, far from it. And “business as usual” with fossil fuels is not an option. The smart solution is an energy mix based on better technologies and, above all, greater efficiency.

Striking a new energy approach is a realistic way forward since it means implementing policies already being considered. Demand for energy is rising and so all options must be involved, whether oil and gas, carbon sequestration, nuclear power, biomass, wind or solar energy. Some new technologies will have to be further developed, and others made more effective.

Take coal. This is the most carbon-emitting fuel in power generation, but it is an abundant and dense energy source. China is the world’s largest user of coal and it is the main fuel for electricity generation in the US and Germany too. Its use is set to go on rising. Equipping new coal generators with technologies to capture carbon to reduce emissions and increase efficiency will be important.

In fact, policies that promote efficiency in output and use of energy contribute to 80% of the CO2 emissions avoided under the IEA’s alternative policy scenario. This demands changes which governments can promote.

Setting effective fiscal policies is an obvious step. We know taxes can discipline energy use. However, energy products and motor vehicles already account for the largest number of environmentally-related taxes in the OECD area. Their effectiveness could be improved if some exemptions to energy and motor vehicle industries were better controlled. As for subsidies, these should target cleaner energy innovations and practices, and not distort or protect markets.

Governments must provide a business environment that incites change and encourages new energy models. They must be innovative in funding research and demonstration, and promoting competition in all energy markets. Government can lead the way in their own procurement practices, in cleaner transport contracts, for instance. And carbon trading must be allowed to function.

Governments can also lead by setting building standards and energy requirements for industry. Such standards should spur market opportunities among energy suppliers and promote energy-efficient habits among businesses and households, in building insulation, heating, lighting or transport.

Many initiatives will be nationally or locally focused though with a global impact. And as we focus on solving the side-effects of our insatiable appetite for energy, let us not forget that 1.6 billion people have no electricity at all. Over a million people, mainly women and children, die every year because of fumes from inefficient cooking stoves. We must do more to bring modern energy systems to developing countries and save lives.

Do we have the political will to change? The messages in this edition’s special roundtable of OECD ministers responsible for energy policy reflect a determination which suggests that we do. Thus, we must step up the momentum. Time is not on our side.

©OECD Observer No 258/259, December 2006

Updated April 2007.

Economic data


Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • “Nizip” refugee camp visit
    July 2016: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría visits the “Nizip” refugee camp, situated between Gaziantep and the Turkish-Syrian border, accompanied by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek. The camp accommodates a small number of the 2.75 million Syrians currently registered in Turkey, mostly outside the camps. In his tour of the camp, Mr Gurría visits a school, speaks with refugees and gives a short interview.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • Queen Maxima of the Netherlands gives a speech next to Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto (not pictured) during the International Forum of Financial Inclusion at the National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico June 21, 2016.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • OECD Environment Director Simon Upton presented a talk at Imperial College London on 21 April 2016. With the world awash in surplus oil and prices languishing around US$40 per barrel, how can governments step up efforts to transform the world’s energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement?
  • Happy 10th birthday to Twitter. This 2008 OECD Observer interview with Henry Copeland said you’d do well.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Once migrants reach Europe, countries face integration challenge: OECD's Thomas Liebig speaks to NPR's Audie Cornish.

  • Message from the International Space Station to COP21

  • The carbon clock is ticking: OECD’s Gurría on CNBC

  • If we want to reach zero net emissions by the end of the century, we must align our policies for a low-carbon economy, put a price on carbon everywhere, spend less subsidising fossil fuels and invest more in clean energy. OECD at #COP21 – OECD statement for #COP21
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa. blogs.worldbank.org
  • Pole to Paris Project
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • How can cities fight climate change?
    Discover projects in Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan and Mexico.
  • Climate: What's changed, what hasn't, what we can do about it.
    Lecture by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, hosted by the London School of Economics and Aviva Investors in association with ClimateWise, London, UK, 3 July 2015.
  • Is technological progress slowing down? Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on www.ft.com.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .

Most Popular Articles


What issue are you most concerned about in 2016?

Euro crisis
International conflict
Global warming

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2016