Climate change: No cop out

At Copenhagen world leaders moved forward in step on climate change. More progress is needed in the year ahead.

No matter how firm the scientific evidence may be, confronting the climate change problem globally and effectively remains a challenge.

After weeks of negotiating and uncertainty about who would be on board, an 11th hour agreement dubbed the Copenhagen Accord was finally drawn up on 18 December by a limited group of leading countries, and the next day the Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP15) took note of the accord.

No-one doubted that solving climate change would be difficult, economically and politically, and for many in civil society, business and policy circles, the outcome of the conference fell short of expectations. But in the circumstances there was also some relief, and even satisfaction, that an agreement was finally reached. In the words of the Danish prime minister and conference chair, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, “we have achieved a result.”

Having heads of state and government from the world’s largest emitters gather in a room and acknowledge that “deep cuts in global emissions are required” and the need for countries to “co-operate in achieving the peaking of global and national emissions as soon as possible”, bearing in mind priorities such as development and poverty eradication, sent a serious signal. “Though far from perfect, the Copenhagen Accord is a hard-fought political agreement,” said OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría after the conference. “With most countries likely to sign, it is a breakthrough towards collective international action to limit global emissions and help build cleaner, more resilient economies.”

The accord’s package of measures was agreed by leaders of both the largest emitting countries and small vulnerable states who together expressed a “strong political will to urgently combat climate change in accordance with the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities.” The ultimate objective is to “stabilise greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system”, which the agreement recognises as holding the increase in global temperature at “below 2 degrees Celsius”.

Various approaches to mitigate climate change are to be used, including market opportunities to enhance the cost-effectiveness of mitigating action. The accord recognises the need to tackle deforestation and agrees to establish a Copenhagen Green Climate Fund to mobilise financing and a high-level panel to study the contribution of potential sources of revenue, including alternative funding, towards meeting the finance goals. New financing to help developing countries to address climate change more generally was a notable feature of the agreement, with developed countries committing to “a goal of mobilising jointly US$100 billion a year by 2020 to address the needs of developing countries” and “to provide new and additional resources, including forestry and investments through international institutions, approaching US$30 billion for the period 2010-2012”, with least developed countries, small island developing states and Africa being the priorities.

An assessment of the implementation of the accord to be completed by 2015 is called for. For this to happen, many experts say more clarity will be needed on the likes of targets, market mechanisms and measuring, reporting and verifying progress. Policymakers, business and civil society will be working together to fill in these gaps in the run-up to the next climate change conference in Mexico later in 2010. The OECD is supporting international efforts towards a substantial outcome at that meeting. “We look forward to working with Mexico and the broader international community, ideally to establish a legally-binding agreement for post-2012 action,” Secretary-General Gurría said, warning that to “achieve this agreement, international organisations have a major role to play by informing the discussions and helping negotiating parties reach a common understanding of the issues at stake.”

Take the issue of targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. OECD analysis suggests that under the targets declared up until Copenhagen, developed countries would reduce emissions by only 18% in 2020 compared with 1990 levels, which is below the 25-40% reduction needed to stay within a 2°C temperature increase according to the scientists.

Developing countries also need to go further, and the OECD is working to help both developed and developing countries identify where they can step-up reductions, while still allowing the economy to grow. This also means greater analysis of how to adapt to climate change in all areas of economic development, and focusing on ways to assist developing countries to manage the risks and become more resilient to possible impacts of climate change.

On financing, the OECD is exploring ways for governments to ensure that their domestic policy frameworks set the right price for carbon and send the right signal to private investors. For instance, if developed countries reduced their emissions by 20% by 2020, based on a mix of policies that included instruments such as taxes and trading markets that put a price on carbon, they could raise the equivalent of 2.5% of their GDP. A fraction of that amount would be enough to supply the public money they agreed to provide in Copenhagen.

All these steps matter, reinforcing other areas policymakers must encourage, such as better access to technological innovations, more consumer and industry information, and more effort in adaptation.

While the outcome of Copenhagen did not deliver the certainty that many people had hoped for, declarations of targets and actions that both developed and developing countries have already made under the Copenhagen Accord indicate that COP15 did at least secure an important step in the right direction. The challenge the global community now faces is to deliver on country pledges for mitigation action by 2020. That means world leaders must step up to the plate and deliver climate finance, and agree on a broad post-2012 climate framework. The task will not be easy, but it is achievable, and necessary for a sustainable future. That should be enough to drive everyone forward on the road to COP16 in Mexico later this year. RJC


Download the Copenhagen Accord at www.en.cop15.dk  

Visit www.oecd.org/greengrowth 


©OECD Observer No 276-277 December 2009-January 2010




Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Africa's cities at the forefront of progress: Africa is urbanising at a historically rapid pace coupled with an unprecedented demographic boom. By 2050, about 56% of Africans are expected to live in cities. This poses major policy challenges, but make no mistake: Africa’s cities and towns are engines of progress that, if harnessed correctly, can fuel the entire continent’s sustainable development.
  • “Nizip” refugee camp visit
    July 2016: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría visits the “Nizip” refugee camp, situated between Gaziantep and the Turkish-Syrian border, accompanied by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek. The camp accommodates a small number of the 2.75 million Syrians currently registered in Turkey, mostly outside the camps. In his tour of the camp, Mr Gurría visits a school, speaks with refugees and gives a short interview.
  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • Queen Maxima of the Netherlands gives a speech next to Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto (not pictured) during the International Forum of Financial Inclusion at the National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico June 21, 2016.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • OECD Environment Director Simon Upton presented a talk at Imperial College London on 21 April 2016. With the world awash in surplus oil and prices languishing around US$40 per barrel, how can governments step up efforts to transform the world’s energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement?
  • Happy 10th birthday to Twitter. This 2008 OECD Observer interview with Henry Copeland said you’d do well.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Once migrants reach Europe, countries face integration challenge: OECD's Thomas Liebig speaks to NPR's Audie Cornish.

  • Message from the International Space Station to COP21

  • COP21 Will Get Agreement With Teeth: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría on Bloomberg

  • The carbon clock is ticking: OECD’s Gurría on CNBC

  • If we want to reach zero net emissions by the end of the century, we must align our policies for a low-carbon economy, put a price on carbon everywhere, spend less subsidising fossil fuels and invest more in clean energy. OECD at #COP21 – OECD statement for #COP21
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa. blogs.worldbank.org
  • Pole to Paris Project
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • How can cities fight climate change?
    Discover projects in Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan and Mexico.
  • Climate: What's changed, what hasn't, what we can do about it.
    Lecture by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, hosted by the London School of Economics and Aviva Investors in association with ClimateWise, London, UK, 3 July 2015.

  • Climate change: “We should not disagree when scientists tell us we have a window of opportunity–10-15 years–to turn this thing around” argues Senator Bernie Sanders.

  • In the long-run, the EU benefits from migration, says OECD Head of International Migration Division Jean-Christophe Dumont.
  • Is technological progress slowing down? Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on www.ft.com.
  • Catherine Mann, OECD Chief Economist, explains on Bloomberg why "too much bank lending can slow economic growth".
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .

Most Popular Articles

Poll

What issue are you most concerned about in 2016?

Unemployment
Euro crisis
International conflict
Global warming
Other

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2016