How tax can tackle the jobs crisis

OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration

Since 2008, unemployment in the OECD area has leapt from 6.1% to 8.2% in 2011. Governments searching for ways to increase employment must at the same time deal with the large budget deficits that are also a legacy of the crisis. Tax reform can play a role in this balancing act. 

Taxes affect incentives on both sides of the labour market. They can discourage employers from hiring, would-be employees from taking up work, and current employees from working longer and harder. Unsurprisingly then, cutting taxes can increase employment, but how can this be afforded? And if other taxes have to be increased to finance these tax cuts, won’t this reduce employment?

Not necessarily; for as experience shows, different tax reforms affect some employee and employer decisions more than others.

By targeting reforms at the employees and employers that are most responsive to changes in taxation, then the gains in employment can be significant. Moreover, any revenue lost from those changes can be kept to a minimum.

So what reforms can help? One option is to reduce employer taxes–employer social security contributions and payroll taxes–thereby lowering the cost of hiring workers. This may be particularly beneficial for countries with both high employer taxes and generous minimum wage levels which risk pricing some low-skilled workers out of the job market. Here, tax cuts can potentially generate sustained reductions in unemployment, even after countries fully recover from the crisis. Such cuts may also work on a temporary basis to boost labour demand–at least until the crisis ebbs.

Policy makers can get extra impact from these reductions if they target them at businesses that hire new workers, particularly those that have been most affected by the crisis such as youth and the long-term unemployed. This way they can help maintain skill levels and prevent joblessness from becoming structural and harder to tackle later on. Indeed, several countries have implemented targeted concessions in response to the crisis, including Finland, France, Hungary, Ireland, Portugal and Turkey. Meanwhile, 14 OECD countries had already targeted employer tax reductions at low-skilled workers. The evidence from such efforts shows that targeted employer tax reductions do increase employment.

The trouble with these changes is that they can be administratively complex and can create opportunities for taxpayers to “game” the system–by sacking workers and hiring new ones for instance. Care needs to be taken in correctly designing such initiatives, such as by linking temporary reductions to increases in the total number of employees, as has been done in Korea, or to the total payroll. But the rule of thumb is to keep it simple: the more complex the concession, the less likely businesses are to respond to it.

Targeted tax reforms can also provide incentives for the out-of-work to hunt for jobs, and for those already with jobs to work longer and harder to earn more money. The people who are most responsive to such tax changes include low-income workers, older people, and second earners, which generally means women.

Start with low-income earners. Work incentives for this group can be increased in various ways. For example, a tax-free allowance can be introduced or increased, or personal income tax and social security contribution rates and/or thresholds can be altered. However, these reforms can be expensive to implement as they tend to also benefit higher-income earners. Work contingent tax credits, often paid out in cash, have become an increasingly popular tool to both increase work incentives and alleviate in-work poverty. They can be targeted to restrict revenue losses too. Studies show that these tax credits can be very effective at increasing participation of lowincome workers, particularly single parents. Small wonder that some 17 OECD countries have introduced such measures. However, again careful design is needed, as studies also show that the withdrawal of these tax credits up the income scale can reduce the number of hours worked by some middle and higher income earners.

As for older workers, many tax systems currently tax earned income more heavily than pension income, discouraging older people from continuing to work once they are eligible for pension payments.

Click to enlarge

To address this problem, policy makers should consider providing age-based rather than pension-specific tax concessions. Social security charges on older workers could also be reduced to match those due on pension income. Countries could go even further and actively encourage older people to keep working by providing workcontingent tax credits targeted at older workers. Some countries, such as Australia and the Netherlands, do this already.

For second earners the basic structure of many tax systems creates greater disincentives to work than for single earners. For example, family-based taxation and dependent spouse tax credits and allowances tend to cause second earners to pay higher average and marginal tax rates than are faced by single individuals (see chart). Under family-based taxation the second earner’s income is effectively added on to the main earner’s income, which pushes the second earner higher up the progressive income tax schedule; so even if they are earning low wages, they could be paying the top rate in income tax.

Moving from family to individual based taxation, and the removal of dependent spouse allowances can provide an easy win for governments as these reforms will improve second earner work incentives at minimal if any revenue cost. Unsurprisingly then, there has been a strong trend towards individual-based taxation in the OECD area over the last 30 years. Nevertheless 11 OECD countries still allow some form of family-based taxation.

Where politics rules out abandoning family-based taxation, an independent allowance or a work contingent tax credit for second earners could supplement existing arrangements instead. Indeed, these options have merit even in countries with individualbased taxation, especially those that target benefits on the basis of family income as this can create disincentives for second earners just like family-based taxation.

In the end governments need tax revenue, and even these targeted tax reforms can exact a cost in terms of foregone revenue. The task for governments is to weigh their immediate revenue needs against the potential (and beneficial) employment gains that such tax reforms can bring.

The OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration 

OECD (2011), Taxation and Employment, OECD Tax Policy Studies, No. 21, Paris.

OECD (2011), Employment Outlook, Paris.

©OECD Observer No 287 Q4 2011




Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Is technological progress slowing down. Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • An employee prepares breakfast in front of the Eiffel tower at the Parisian luxury hotel Le Plaza Athenee, France July 30, 2015. Nowhere in the world has more accommodation available on Airbnb than Paris. Now the home-sharing website that has transformed budget travel to the French capital is giving its super-deluxe hotels a fright too (©REUTERS/Stephane Mahe).
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on www.ft.com.
  • On 19-20 September, come and visit the OECD to learn more about our home and our work.
  • Low interest rates here to stay for half a century, says OECD director Adrian Blundell-Wignall.
  • OECD speak on support it will offer to Greek
  • Bill Gates visited the OECD on 26 June. He met with the Secretary-General Angel Gurría to discuss areas of collaboration with his foundation and participated at a briefing session on official development assistance modernisation with OECD experts.
  • The People’s Republic of China decided to enhance longstanding collaboration with the OECD and to join the OECD Development Centre, in a historic visit by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang on 1 July to the OECD in Paris.
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • One dollar in aid for trade generates eight dollars in extra trade for all developing countries and 20 dollars for low-income countries. Read OECD Secretary General's post on the newly released Aid for Trade at a glance 2015.
  • Catherine Mann, OECD Chief Economist, explains on Bloomberg why "too much bank lending can slow economic growth".
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .
  • Come va la vita in Italia? How's life in Italy? The OECD Better Life Index is an interactive online platform in seven languages that goes beyond GDP by offering important insights into measuring well-being and quality of life. Try it for yourself!
  • The IMF calls for a decisive energy subsidy reform in order to use the freed resources to meet critical public spending needs and to reduce pollution ahead of the Paris climate change summit.
  • Have a look at these posters representing a world without fundamental rights at work – including child labour, forced labour and inequality. Read more about this ILO image competition here.
  • Africa vs profit shifting African countries heavily rely on the income generated by multinationals’ taxation, which can represent as much as 88% of a country’s tax base. Little wonder Africa is involved in the OECD’s initiative to address tax base erosion caused by profit shifting, known as BEPS. The need to strengthen inter-governmental co-operation to curb cross-border tax losses was reaffirmed at the Africa Tax Administration Forum (ATAF) in Sandton on 21 April 2015.
  • Africa v. profit shifting
  • After three decades of extraordinary economic development, China is shifting to a slower and more sustainable growth path, according to the OECD's latest Economic Survey of China.
  • In pursuit of the American Dream.

Most Popular Articles

Poll

What issue are you most concerned about in 2015?

Euro crisis
Unemployment
Global warming
International conflict
Other

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2015