On the one hand, it is a shame when employers push over-50s into early retirement to make short-term savings on their own balance sheets. The cost is shoved onto the public purse, and the older person's skills, experience and productivity are lost. Governments should confront this through tax and other means. It is also wrong if perfectly healthy over-60s should be forced to retire if they feel ready to continue working.
But on the other hand, without a proper retirement age, many older workers may feel under pressure to work on and on, even if unable to. This can lead to mental stress. The prospect of retirement can be motivating too. With a target age, older people have an incentive to plan their retirements; without one, they could feel demotivated. Also, people are living longer, but not necessarily "disability-free", and some older workers may have even older parents or relatives to care for.
So it is important to maintain a retirement age, and not allow it to become "anachronistic", as your your article suggests.
—R J Doyle, Dublin, Ireland
Comments and letters may be edited for publishing. Send your letters to firstname.lastname@example.org or post your comments at these portals: www.oecdobserver.org, www.oecdinsights.org, or at the other OECD portals on this page.
©OECD Observer No 299, Q2 2014