Water: Unclogging the finance

©Roy Philippe/HEMIS.FR

How to improve water systems is one challenge; financing them is another. Public authorities in most countries play the main role in implementing and funding water infrastructure, but it is a model that is under increasing pressure, with government budgets stretched and banks still prudent about issuing credit. 

There is no generic funding model that can be applied to every need; the sheer diversity of water infrastructures and sources of financing need to be identified, scanned and tapped in line with particular investment types and needs.

There may be small-scale projects initiated by local entrepreneurs, or large infrastructures that serve multiple purposes, such as energy and heavy manufacturing. Some investments may involve green ecosystems to supply, store or filter water.

Not only will these infrastructures have different financing needs, but will access funds in different ways, for instance through capital markets, loans, funds, public expenditures, etc.

Take large dams and large reservoirs. These are costly, long-term affairs. The Three Gorges Dam project in China, for instance, could cost over US$22 billion, according to government estimates, including construction, relocation of residents and financing costs. Moreover, cost recovery is not expected to occur for 10 years after full operation starts.

Such major projects tend to be financed by major development banks such as the Asian Development Bank and World Bank, and institutional investors such as pension funds. The sources for long-term financing are expanding, with the emergence of sovereign funds and philanthropists, as well as of new groups like the Chinese-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which opened in March 2015.

But before leaping into major undertakings such as dams, policymakers must answer several questions. Will the construction lock them in and still be valuable in 25, 50 or 100 years’ time? After all, there are several cases of investments that have fallen into disuse or underuse, such as a desalination plant in Sydney that was built during a severe but temporary drought, and dams in France’s Loire Valley that are now being decommissioned at some cost. Had a more forward-probing “value options” approach been used in planning them, they might not have been built in the first place.

There are other basic questions that can be expensive to overlook, such as whether the gleaming new waste-water treatment plant fits the wider network, and will not lead to a cascade of background costs to make it work properly. Getting such sequencing right can save money and create more value.

Not every water project has to be major. In fact, cheaper, more modest projects can be more effective, more flexible and far more easily financed, too. Policies that encourage households to buy their own water-saving appliances, for instance, or farmers to invest in water-efficient crops and irrigation techniques not only are cost-effective but offer flexibility in the face of climate change.

In fact, efficiency and flexibility gains should be systematically mainstreamed into any water-wise policies anyway. Moreover, when a problem emerges, policymakers should act sooner rather than later to avoid accumulating costs for the future: had São Paolo acted five years ago to address water shortages, the solutions then might have been more affordable than today. Likewise, properly maintaining existing water assets, such as pipes, can save money in the long run, as OECD countries are finding out.

Innovative “green” solutions can also offer a cheaper route than costly, heavy “grey” approaches. Cities such as Philadelphia are discovering this: rather than build a new sewage treatment plant to handle storm water run-off from streets and car parks, for a fifth of the cost they are looking at replacing hard surfaces with sponge-like porous ones, which storm water can percolate through.

To attract financing, what matters is for policymakers to put forward truly bankable and appropriate projects that are capable of attracting a variety of suitable investors. Financiers have a “risk and reward” mentality, and will generally go for low returns only if they are thought to be safe and constant, and back riskier investments for higher returns.

Policymakers should remember that private firms involved in water systems may have funding of their own to bring to the table. They would do well to create the innovative business and regulatory environment that allows them to enter the fray, as this would bring not only technical and managerial skills, but some very useful financial capital as well. Rory J. Clarke

For more information on financing and water, contact Xavier.Leflaive@oecd.org

Water: Fit to Finance? Catalysing National Growth through Investment in Water Security, report by High-Level Panel on Financing for a Water Secure World, a joint initiative by the OECD and the World Water Council

OECD (2012), A Framework for Financing Water Resources Management, OECD Publishing, Paris.

More:

OECD Programme on Water Governance

Nurturing our water empire

Water governance at stake

OECD Observer articles on water

wwww.oecd.org/water

7th World Water Forum 2015

©OECD Observer 302 April 2015




Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q4 2017 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.2% Feb 2018 annual
Trade: +2.7% exp, +3.0% imp, Q4 2017
Unemployment: 5.4% Feb 2018
Last update: 11 Apr 2018

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • Ambassador Aleksander Surdej, Permanent Representative of Poland to the OECD, was a guest on France 24’s English-language show “The Debate”, where he discussed French President Emmanuel Macron’s speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Rousseau
  • Do you trust your government? The OECD’s How's life 2017 report finds that only 38% of people in OECD countries trust their government. How can we improve our old "Social contract?" Read more.
  • Papers show “past coming back to haunt us”: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria tells Sky News that the so-called "Paradise Papers" show a past coming back to haunt us, but one which is now being dismantled. Please watch the video.
  • When someone asks me to describe an ideal girl, in my head, she is a person who is physically and mentally independent, brave to speak her mind, treated with respect just like she treats others, and inspiring to herself and others. But I know that the reality is still so much different. By Alda, 18, on International Day of the Girl. Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Read some of the insightful remarks made at OECD Forum 2017, held on 6-7 June. OECD Forum kick-started events with a focus on inclusive growth, digitalisation, and trust, under the overall theme of Bridging Divides.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2018