Keeping track of decoupling

Environment Directorate

How can we be sure that actions to curb environmental damage are effective? Establishing reliable ways to measure the results is crucial to meeting this challenge.

Economic growth should not mean an accompanying increase in the pace of environmental degradation over the next decade, OECD ministers agreed at their annual meeting in May. But for this strategy to succeed, governments must be able to measure the effect of actions aimed at decoupling environmental pressures from economic growth. Removing lead from petrol is not enough: we need to be able to demonstrate that the link has been broken between increased vehicle use and increased emissions. Without such decoupling, sustainable development cannot happen. Governments have asked the OECD to develop indicators of sustainable development – economic, environmental and social – including indicators for environmental decoupling.

The OECD has carried out work on indicators for many years, including in its reviews of environmental policy in OECD and some non-OECD countries. Giving more emphasis in these reviews to the pace of decoupling will be an important part of the Environment Strategy from now on, perhaps along the lines shown in the recent review of Germany (see box). Decoupling indicators will be needed for both pollution (e.g., air, water and waste) and natural resource use (e.g., climate change, water, eco-system protection and biological diversity). The choice and the presentation of such indicators will have to be guided by their relevance to policy and by the extent of decoupling required.

Decoupling is strong when economic growth leads to at least no increase in environmental degradation. This is rather rare but has been seen in OECD countries in the case of emissions of several local air pollutants, ozone-depleting CFCs and lead emissions from petrol. Weak decoupling is more common; most OECD countries have realised some level of decoupling of environmental degradation from economic growth for energy, water and resource use in recent decades, though environmental degradation continues. In energy, for instance, total final energy use in OECD countries grew 17% between 1980 and 1998, but the energy intensity (the ratio of total primary energy supply to GDP) of economic activity fell by 16% over the same period. Unfortunately, not even weak decoupling is yet evident for some indirect sources of environmental pressure, like municipal waste generation and transport use, in particular cars, in most OECD countries.

While strong decoupling is clearly desirable in some cases, such as in toxic pollution, weak decoupling would be sufficient for natural resource use. Environmental science can help determine the “correct” level of environmental pressures, for example, by determining the maximum level of a certain pollutant that a water system can assimilate.

But setting the actual limits is a policy question. After all, in taking account of the costs and benefits to society of achieving a certain amount of decoupling, it may not always be possible to determine scientifically the “right” level of decoupling. The use of a renewable natural resource, whether water or a plant or animal species, should not exceed its regenerative capacity. Establishing the right level of use beyond that will usually involve “getting the prices right” and allowing the market to determine how much use will be made at the established price.

This means making users pay the full costs for their use of the resource, for example, by removing environmentally harmful subsidies and ensuring that firms “internalise” all of their environmental costs. Changes in consumption patterns, which may be encouraged by instruments such as eco-labelling or direct consumer pressure, often with the help of NGOs, can also slow the relative growth in demand for particularly pollution-intensive or resource-intensive goods and services. Voluntary business initiatives such as including some environmental impacts in company reporting can also help. Several organisations, such as Global Reporting Initiative, are working on ways to achieve this (see article by Robert Massie, Observer No. 226-227).

The aim of good indicators for sustainable development clearly has to be to simplify policy decisions and to ensure that reductions in one pressure are not offset by increases in another. An aggregate indicator for the overall extent of decoupling of environmental pressures from economic growth would of course be useful, but finding the right one may be a long way off. Many existing measurement systems have serious drawbacks. The “ecological footprint” approach, for instance, which uses the land needed to support the activities of a country’s people as a measure of the total pressure on the earth, may help to show whether decoupling is occurring, but not its pace. Nor does it take into account the effects of pollution, surely one of the most serious environmental problems. Another candidate, total material use, which measures the total material required per unit of GDP, suffers from the same weaknesses.

Aggregate measures may emerge in the future, but for now, indicators covering a “cluster” of environmental pressures seem more feasible. Impacts on human health measured in terms of healthy years lost because of pollution, combined with data on the health effects of specific levels of individual pollutants, could be used to produce a weighted index of local air pollution for instance. Cluster indices would make the information much more accessible, comprehensible and useful.

Whatever the approach, the right level of decoupling will be hard to calculate, whether for pollution or for natural resource use. Indeed, developing a set of policy-relevant indicators of decoupling that meet the expectations of governments and citizens, and that can be agreed on for use in the OECD’s economic, social and environmental reviews, will clearly be a major challenge over the months to come.


• Towards Sustainable Development: Environmental Indicators, OECD, 2001.

 OECD Environmental Data Compendium, 1999.

• Key Environmental Indicators, OECD, 2001.

• OECD Environmental Outlook, 2001.

• Waller-Hunter, J., “The environment: from words to action”, in OECD Observer No. 226/227, Summer 2001.

• Massie, R., “Reporting on sustainability”, in OECD Observer, No. 226/227, Summer 2001.

©OECD Observer No 228, September 2001 

Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q1 2019 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.3% May 2019 annual
Trade: +0.4% exp, -1.2% imp, Q1 2019
Unemployment: 5.2% July 2019
Last update: 8 July 2019

OECD Observer Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Subscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To order your own paper editions,email

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • MCM logo
  • The following communiqué and Chair’s statement were issued at the close of the OECD Council Meeting at Ministerial level, this year presided by the Slovak Republic.
  • Food production will suffer some of the most immediate and brutal effects of climate change, with some regions of the world suffering far more than others. Only through unhindered global trade can we ensure that high-quality, nutritious food reaches those who need it most, Angel Gurría, Secretary-General of the OECD, and José Graziano da Silva, Director-General of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, write in their latest Project Syndicate article. Read the article here.
  • Globalisation will continue and get stronger, and how to harness it is the great challenge, says OECD Secretary-General Gurría on Bloomberg TV. Watch the interview here.
  • OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría with UN Secretary-General António Guterres at the 73rd Session of the UN General Assembly, in New York City.
  • The new OECD Observer Crossword, with Myles Mellor. Try it online!
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2019