Keeping track of decoupling

Environment Directorate

How can we be sure that actions to curb environmental damage are effective? Establishing reliable ways to measure the results is crucial to meeting this challenge.

Economic growth should not mean an accompanying increase in the pace of environmental degradation over the next decade, OECD ministers agreed at their annual meeting in May. But for this strategy to succeed, governments must be able to measure the effect of actions aimed at decoupling environmental pressures from economic growth. Removing lead from petrol is not enough: we need to be able to demonstrate that the link has been broken between increased vehicle use and increased emissions. Without such decoupling, sustainable development cannot happen. Governments have asked the OECD to develop indicators of sustainable development – economic, environmental and social – including indicators for environmental decoupling.

The OECD has carried out work on indicators for many years, including in its reviews of environmental policy in OECD and some non-OECD countries. Giving more emphasis in these reviews to the pace of decoupling will be an important part of the Environment Strategy from now on, perhaps along the lines shown in the recent review of Germany (see box). Decoupling indicators will be needed for both pollution (e.g., air, water and waste) and natural resource use (e.g., climate change, water, eco-system protection and biological diversity). The choice and the presentation of such indicators will have to be guided by their relevance to policy and by the extent of decoupling required.

Decoupling is strong when economic growth leads to at least no increase in environmental degradation. This is rather rare but has been seen in OECD countries in the case of emissions of several local air pollutants, ozone-depleting CFCs and lead emissions from petrol. Weak decoupling is more common; most OECD countries have realised some level of decoupling of environmental degradation from economic growth for energy, water and resource use in recent decades, though environmental degradation continues. In energy, for instance, total final energy use in OECD countries grew 17% between 1980 and 1998, but the energy intensity (the ratio of total primary energy supply to GDP) of economic activity fell by 16% over the same period. Unfortunately, not even weak decoupling is yet evident for some indirect sources of environmental pressure, like municipal waste generation and transport use, in particular cars, in most OECD countries.

While strong decoupling is clearly desirable in some cases, such as in toxic pollution, weak decoupling would be sufficient for natural resource use. Environmental science can help determine the “correct” level of environmental pressures, for example, by determining the maximum level of a certain pollutant that a water system can assimilate.

But setting the actual limits is a policy question. After all, in taking account of the costs and benefits to society of achieving a certain amount of decoupling, it may not always be possible to determine scientifically the “right” level of decoupling. The use of a renewable natural resource, whether water or a plant or animal species, should not exceed its regenerative capacity. Establishing the right level of use beyond that will usually involve “getting the prices right” and allowing the market to determine how much use will be made at the established price.

This means making users pay the full costs for their use of the resource, for example, by removing environmentally harmful subsidies and ensuring that firms “internalise” all of their environmental costs. Changes in consumption patterns, which may be encouraged by instruments such as eco-labelling or direct consumer pressure, often with the help of NGOs, can also slow the relative growth in demand for particularly pollution-intensive or resource-intensive goods and services. Voluntary business initiatives such as including some environmental impacts in company reporting can also help. Several organisations, such as Global Reporting Initiative, are working on ways to achieve this (see article by Robert Massie, Observer No. 226-227).

The aim of good indicators for sustainable development clearly has to be to simplify policy decisions and to ensure that reductions in one pressure are not offset by increases in another. An aggregate indicator for the overall extent of decoupling of environmental pressures from economic growth would of course be useful, but finding the right one may be a long way off. Many existing measurement systems have serious drawbacks. The “ecological footprint” approach, for instance, which uses the land needed to support the activities of a country’s people as a measure of the total pressure on the earth, may help to show whether decoupling is occurring, but not its pace. Nor does it take into account the effects of pollution, surely one of the most serious environmental problems. Another candidate, total material use, which measures the total material required per unit of GDP, suffers from the same weaknesses.

Aggregate measures may emerge in the future, but for now, indicators covering a “cluster” of environmental pressures seem more feasible. Impacts on human health measured in terms of healthy years lost because of pollution, combined with data on the health effects of specific levels of individual pollutants, could be used to produce a weighted index of local air pollution for instance. Cluster indices would make the information much more accessible, comprehensible and useful.

Whatever the approach, the right level of decoupling will be hard to calculate, whether for pollution or for natural resource use. Indeed, developing a set of policy-relevant indicators of decoupling that meet the expectations of governments and citizens, and that can be agreed on for use in the OECD’s economic, social and environmental reviews, will clearly be a major challenge over the months to come.

References

• Towards Sustainable Development: Environmental Indicators, OECD, 2001.

 OECD Environmental Data Compendium, 1999.

• Key Environmental Indicators, OECD, 2001.

• OECD Environmental Outlook, 2001.

• Waller-Hunter, J., “The environment: from words to action”, in OECD Observer No. 226/227, Summer 2001.

• Massie, R., “Reporting on sustainability”, in OECD Observer, No. 226/227, Summer 2001.

©OECD Observer No 228, September 2001 




Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q3 2017 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.3% Sept 2017 annual
Trade: +4.3% exp, +4.3% imp, Q3 2017
Unemployment: 5.7% Sept 2017
Last update: 14 Nov 2017

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Rousseau
  • Do you trust your government? The OECD’s How's life 2017 report finds that only 38% of people in OECD countries trust their government. How can we improve our old "Social contract?" Read more.
  • Papers show “past coming back to haunt us”: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria tells Sky News that the so-called "Paradise Papers" show a past coming back to haunt us, but one which is now being dismantled. Please watch the video.
  • The annual OECD Eurasia Week takes place in Almaty, Kazakhstan 23-25 October. Writing in The Astana Times, OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría urges Eurasia countries to stay the course on openness and international integration, which has brought prosperity but also disillusionment, notably regarding inequality. The OECD is working with this key region, and Mr Gurría urges Eurasia to focus on human capital and innovation to enhance productivity and people’s well-being. Read more.
  • When someone asks me to describe an ideal girl, in my head, she is a person who is physically and mentally independent, brave to speak her mind, treated with respect just like she treats others, and inspiring to herself and others. But I know that the reality is still so much different. By Alda, 18, on International Day of the Girl. Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Read some of the insightful remarks made at OECD Forum 2017, held on 6-7 June. OECD Forum kick-started events with a focus on inclusive growth, digitalisation, and trust, under the overall theme of Bridging Divides.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • How do the largest community of British expats living in Spain feel about Brexit? Britons living in Orihuela Costa, Alicante give their views.
  • Brexit is taking up Europe's energy and focus, according to OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría. Watch video.
  • OECD Chief Economist Catherine Mann and former Bank of England Governor Mervyn King discuss the economic merits of a US border adjustment tax and the outlook for US economic growth.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2017