China: How FEASIBLE is water investment?

Environment Directorate

Putting together a water financing and management strategy requires looking at a range of questions. The most important one is, can we afford it?

This is particularly tricky to answer realistically for large environmental projects that require heavy capital investments in public infrastructure and have a long lifespan. To keep to spending targets, decision-makers have to work out how much they have to spend on everything from buying capital and land to maintenance and operation expenditure. Their calculations have to be realistic and multi-annual.

There is an appropriately named software that helps policymakers do all this called FEASIBLE. The application is used to support a standardised methodological framework known as the Environmental Financing Strategy. It diagnoses scenarios, showing where the bottlenecks lie and what kind of funding and intervention may be needed. FEASIBLE has been used to prepare financing strategies for the urban water and wastewater sector in Armenia, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan, and for five oblasts in the Russian Federation towns of Novgorod, Pskov, Rostov, Yaroslavl and Kaliningrad, and for municipal solid waste management in Novgorod.

Now China is interested and, with assistance from the OECD, is applying the FEASIBLE model to wastewater collection and treatment in 14 cities and urban zones in Sichuan province, with a total population of 3 million people. A baseline scenario is drawn up; in the Sichuan case this assumes that ongoing construction of seven wastewater treatment plants will be completed as scheduled and all already committed financing will be provided. Otherwise the water situation in 2000 will continue until 2020. FEASIBLE’s take on this was revealing.

For a start, it showed that investment needs are several times higher for wastewater collection systems than for wastewater treatment plants; and as sewer system development will lag behind wastewater treatment plant construction, by 2004, new treatment plants will not have enough wastewater unless new investments in sewers are launched. But the baseline public financing has earmarked spending to wastewater treatment plants rather than sewers. Another observation was that the structure of financing in Sichuan relies much more heavily on public budgets than in OECD countries, with wastewater fees paid by households, industry, and other consumers covering only about 30% of infrastructure operating costs and less than 20% of operation and maintenance costs combined. Still, domestic financing was feasible and on average, the current water and wastewater tariffs were affordable, though in most cities the poorest 10-20% of the population will need additional social support. The affordability problems may become more acute when large scale sewerage investments begin.

A second phase of work between the OECD and the Chinese government will show how this baseline scenario might respond by tweaking various policy instruments, say, to mobilise additional finance or by rescheduling the investment programme.

For more on FEASIBLE, contact

©OECD Observer No 236, March 2003

Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q3 2017 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.4% Nov 2017 annual
Trade: +4.3% exp, +4.3% imp, Q3 2017
Unemployment: 5.6% Nov 2017
Last update: 16 Jan 2018


Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive paper editions delivered to you directly

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • Rousseau
  • Do you trust your government? The OECD’s How's life 2017 report finds that only 38% of people in OECD countries trust their government. How can we improve our old "Social contract?" Read more.
  • Papers show “past coming back to haunt us”: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria tells Sky News that the so-called "Paradise Papers" show a past coming back to haunt us, but one which is now being dismantled. Please watch the video.
  • When someone asks me to describe an ideal girl, in my head, she is a person who is physically and mentally independent, brave to speak her mind, treated with respect just like she treats others, and inspiring to herself and others. But I know that the reality is still so much different. By Alda, 18, on International Day of the Girl. Read more.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Read some of the insightful remarks made at OECD Forum 2017, held on 6-7 June. OECD Forum kick-started events with a focus on inclusive growth, digitalisation, and trust, under the overall theme of Bridging Divides.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2018