Climate change: No cop out

At Copenhagen world leaders moved forward in step on climate change. More progress is needed in the year ahead.

No matter how firm the scientific evidence may be, confronting the climate change problem globally and effectively remains a challenge.

After weeks of negotiating and uncertainty about who would be on board, an 11th hour agreement dubbed the Copenhagen Accord was finally drawn up on 18 December by a limited group of leading countries, and the next day the Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP15) took note of the accord.

No-one doubted that solving climate change would be difficult, economically and politically, and for many in civil society, business and policy circles, the outcome of the conference fell short of expectations. But in the circumstances there was also some relief, and even satisfaction, that an agreement was finally reached. In the words of the Danish prime minister and conference chair, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, “we have achieved a result.”

Having heads of state and government from the world’s largest emitters gather in a room and acknowledge that “deep cuts in global emissions are required” and the need for countries to “co-operate in achieving the peaking of global and national emissions as soon as possible”, bearing in mind priorities such as development and poverty eradication, sent a serious signal. “Though far from perfect, the Copenhagen Accord is a hard-fought political agreement,” said OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría after the conference. “With most countries likely to sign, it is a breakthrough towards collective international action to limit global emissions and help build cleaner, more resilient economies.”

The accord’s package of measures was agreed by leaders of both the largest emitting countries and small vulnerable states who together expressed a “strong political will to urgently combat climate change in accordance with the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities.” The ultimate objective is to “stabilise greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system”, which the agreement recognises as holding the increase in global temperature at “below 2 degrees Celsius”.

Various approaches to mitigate climate change are to be used, including market opportunities to enhance the cost-effectiveness of mitigating action. The accord recognises the need to tackle deforestation and agrees to establish a Copenhagen Green Climate Fund to mobilise financing and a high-level panel to study the contribution of potential sources of revenue, including alternative funding, towards meeting the finance goals. New financing to help developing countries to address climate change more generally was a notable feature of the agreement, with developed countries committing to “a goal of mobilising jointly US$100 billion a year by 2020 to address the needs of developing countries” and “to provide new and additional resources, including forestry and investments through international institutions, approaching US$30 billion for the period 2010-2012”, with least developed countries, small island developing states and Africa being the priorities.

An assessment of the implementation of the accord to be completed by 2015 is called for. For this to happen, many experts say more clarity will be needed on the likes of targets, market mechanisms and measuring, reporting and verifying progress. Policymakers, business and civil society will be working together to fill in these gaps in the run-up to the next climate change conference in Mexico later in 2010. The OECD is supporting international efforts towards a substantial outcome at that meeting. “We look forward to working with Mexico and the broader international community, ideally to establish a legally-binding agreement for post-2012 action,” Secretary-General Gurría said, warning that to “achieve this agreement, international organisations have a major role to play by informing the discussions and helping negotiating parties reach a common understanding of the issues at stake.”

Take the issue of targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. OECD analysis suggests that under the targets declared up until Copenhagen, developed countries would reduce emissions by only 18% in 2020 compared with 1990 levels, which is below the 25-40% reduction needed to stay within a 2°C temperature increase according to the scientists.

Developing countries also need to go further, and the OECD is working to help both developed and developing countries identify where they can step-up reductions, while still allowing the economy to grow. This also means greater analysis of how to adapt to climate change in all areas of economic development, and focusing on ways to assist developing countries to manage the risks and become more resilient to possible impacts of climate change.

On financing, the OECD is exploring ways for governments to ensure that their domestic policy frameworks set the right price for carbon and send the right signal to private investors. For instance, if developed countries reduced their emissions by 20% by 2020, based on a mix of policies that included instruments such as taxes and trading markets that put a price on carbon, they could raise the equivalent of 2.5% of their GDP. A fraction of that amount would be enough to supply the public money they agreed to provide in Copenhagen.

All these steps matter, reinforcing other areas policymakers must encourage, such as better access to technological innovations, more consumer and industry information, and more effort in adaptation.

While the outcome of Copenhagen did not deliver the certainty that many people had hoped for, declarations of targets and actions that both developed and developing countries have already made under the Copenhagen Accord indicate that COP15 did at least secure an important step in the right direction. The challenge the global community now faces is to deliver on country pledges for mitigation action by 2020. That means world leaders must step up to the plate and deliver climate finance, and agree on a broad post-2012 climate framework. The task will not be easy, but it is achievable, and necessary for a sustainable future. That should be enough to drive everyone forward on the road to COP16 in Mexico later this year. RJC

Download the Copenhagen Accord at Visit 

©OECD Observer No 276-277 December 2009-January 2010

Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q1 2019 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.3% May 2019 annual
Trade: +0.4% exp, -1.2% imp, Q1 2019
Unemployment: 5.2% July 2019
Last update: 8 July 2019

OECD Observer Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Subscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To order your own paper editions,email

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • MCM logo
  • The following communiqué and Chair’s statement were issued at the close of the OECD Council Meeting at Ministerial level, this year presided by the Slovak Republic.
  • Food production will suffer some of the most immediate and brutal effects of climate change, with some regions of the world suffering far more than others. Only through unhindered global trade can we ensure that high-quality, nutritious food reaches those who need it most, Angel Gurría, Secretary-General of the OECD, and José Graziano da Silva, Director-General of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, write in their latest Project Syndicate article. Read the article here.
  • Globalisation will continue and get stronger, and how to harness it is the great challenge, says OECD Secretary-General Gurría on Bloomberg TV. Watch the interview here.
  • OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría with UN Secretary-General António Guterres at the 73rd Session of the UN General Assembly, in New York City.
  • The new OECD Observer Crossword, with Myles Mellor. Try it online!
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2019