Regional development: Why places matter for better policies

OECD countries are at a critical juncture, as they face deep and often widening inequalities between people and places. Responding to the concerns of communities that feel left behind is a political priority. Policymakers need to focus their efforts more sharply on the places where people live ensuring a more even distribution of services and opportunities. As the OECD Regional Development Policy Committee (RDPC) celebrates its 20-year anniversary, its clear voice is needed more than ever.

Territorial divides affect all aspects of living: distribution of income and wealth; access to quality of fundamental public services; recognition of one’s values, roles and aspirations. Inequalities exist between small towns and mega-cities, peripheries and centres, rural and urban areas. These territorial and spatial divides are at the root of growing public anger, in some places more than in others, and have become a source of social and political turmoil.

These inequalities highlight that a much greater attention is needed to what our national and global policy decisions mean for different places. Large disparities among and within regions confirm it is policies, not inexorable economic forces, that are at play. Markets do not exist in a vacuum: governments design rules of game and policies, and the way they implement them affects the likes of efficiency and distribution, and influence how capital and labour are allocated.

Two decades ago, regional development policy was essentially seen as a policy to subsidise lagging areas and sectors, aimed at compensating top-down spatially-blind interventions and/or the artificial creation of economic poles disconnected from local assets. The lesson from failures and the need to respond to the concerns of communities that feel left behind or simply detached, has repeatedly called for a U-turn in development policy.

Some steps have been taken. Today, several countries are tailoring their national policy interventions to suit different places and designing them to respond to the structural opportunities and constraints of each region. They mobilise local communities by improving the quality of essential services and opportunities for innovation. But in too many contexts policies, disguised as “place-based” approaches, are in fact old subsidy-based interventions focused on sectors, rather than people or their communities.

The meaning of “place-based approach” is therefore useful to know, particularly in the light of experience so far gained from implementing it.

First, place matters for the effectiveness of institutions and policies; technocrats and experts at national level have limited knowledge; contracts are inherently incomplete; local elites are often unwilling to innovate, because they derive power from the same condition of local backwardness: they are part of the problem and part of the solution.

Second, the place-based approach is a novel way to deal both with knowledge and power. Much of the knowledge needed for a place to innovate is embedded in the place itself. Innovation will take place only when local communities will be empowered and engaged in policy design, through a participatory approach based on an informed and open debate among citizens and relevant competent actors.

National public authorities must strike a fine balance by entrusting policy ownership as much as possible to local authorities, while preventing them from acting conservatively as rentiers. This task is achieved by promoting a shared strategy for the future of the place, setting measurable targets for people’s well-being, assisting in the selection of integrated projects, and monitoring the policy implementation process at the right scale. It also means matching different sources of financing and accompanying the local strategy with the necessary sectoral policies for education, health, transports, etc., to take into account specific territorial needs. Indeed, regional development is a “policy of policies”, and one of the very objectives of the place-based approach actually becomes reforming national and regional sectoral policies in a space-aware direction.

The place-based approach implies a radical move. It requires ensuring a more even distribution of people’s services and opportunities in the places where they live. A significant investment in human resources within administrations is a necessary requirement. Multi-level governance systems, adapted to reflect local conditions and capacities, and experimental instruments that embed learning-by-doing and trial and error processes into policy design can help governments to effectively address local investment needs. Continued efforts to improve regional statistics and indicators and their detailed granularity will be critical for assessing the impact of policies.

A place-based perspective can help policymakers explore the regional dimension of global trends that will have a strong impact on our societies over the next 10-20 years, such as ageing population, migration, climate change, globalisation, diffusion of technology and innovation. While some regions and communities are seizing the opportunities these trends bring, many others are struggling to keep up. Current threats to local services, jobs and the environment are spurring this extraordinary public reaction, especially among young and very young generations. Environmental and social justice must both be a strong concern of governments. We can turn technological change and a global and open environment into a source of improvement. A place-based approach to policy-making can show us the way forward.

References and further reading

For an updated conceptual framework, see Fabrizio Barca, “Place-based Policy and Politics”, in Renewal, a Journal of Social Democracy, 2019, forthcoming in March. This conceptual framework has been influenced by several policy experiences and in particular by the lessons of Italy’s Strategy for Inner Areas, aimed at stopping demographic decline and relaunching the social and economic development of remote rural areas. Data and analysis are available at:

See also:

Atkinson, Anthony (2015), Inequality. What can be done?, Harvard University Press

Bachtler, John, and Joaquim Oliveira Martins, Peter Wostner,  Piotr Zuber, (2017), “Towards Cohesion Policy 4.0”, Regional Studies Association.

Dorf, Michael C.  and Charles F. Sabel (1998), “A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism”, Columbia Law Review.

Haidt, Jonathan(2012), Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, Pantheon Books.Pose, Andrés

Rodriguez  (2018), “The Revenge of Places that Don’t Matter (and What to Do About It)”, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society.

Rosés, Joan R.  and Nikolaus Wolf (2018), “Regional Economic Development in Europe 1900-2010”, CEPR Discussion Paper.

Sen, Armartya (2009), The idea of Justice, Allen Lane.

©OECD Observer March 2019

Economic data

GDP growth: +0.6% Q1 2019 year-on-year
Consumer price inflation: 2.3% May 2019 annual
Trade: +0.4% exp, -1.2% imp, Q1 2019
Unemployment: 5.2% July 2019
Last update: 8 July 2019

OECD Observer Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Subscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To order your own paper editions,email

Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • MCM logo
  • The following communiqué and Chair’s statement were issued at the close of the OECD Council Meeting at Ministerial level, this year presided by the Slovak Republic.
  • Food production will suffer some of the most immediate and brutal effects of climate change, with some regions of the world suffering far more than others. Only through unhindered global trade can we ensure that high-quality, nutritious food reaches those who need it most, Angel Gurría, Secretary-General of the OECD, and José Graziano da Silva, Director-General of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, write in their latest Project Syndicate article. Read the article here.
  • Globalisation will continue and get stronger, and how to harness it is the great challenge, says OECD Secretary-General Gurría on Bloomberg TV. Watch the interview here.
  • OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría with UN Secretary-General António Guterres at the 73rd Session of the UN General Assembly, in New York City.
  • The new OECD Observer Crossword, with Myles Mellor. Try it online!
  • Listen to the "Robots are coming for our jobs" episode of The Guardian's "Chips with Everything podcast", in which The Guardian’s economics editor, Larry Elliott, and Jeremy Wyatt, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, and Jordan Erica Webber, freelance journalist, discuss the findings of the new OECD report "Automation, skills use and training". Listen here.
  • Do we really know the difference between right and wrong? Alison Taylor of BSR and Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch tell us why it matters to play by the rules. Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview here.
  • Has public decision-making been hijacked by a privileged few? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Stav Shaffir, MK (Zionist Union) Chair of the Knesset Committee on Transparency here.
  • Can a nudge help us make more ethical decisions? Watch the recording of our Facebook live interview with Saugatto Datta, managing director at ideas42 here.
  • The fight against tax evasion is gaining further momentum as Barbados, Côte d’Ivoire, Jamaica, Malaysia, Panama and Tunisia signed the BEPS Multilateral Convention on 24 January, bringing the total number of signatories to 78. The Convention strengthens existing tax treaties and reduces opportunities for tax avoidance by multinational enterprises.
  • Globalisation’s many benefits have been unequally shared, and public policy has struggled to keep up with a rapidly-shifting world. The OECD is working alongside governments and international organisations to help improve and harness the gains while tackling the root causes of inequality, and ensuring a level playing field globally. Please watch.
  • Checking out the job situation with the OECD scoreboard of labour market performances: do you want to know how your country compares with neighbours and competitors on income levels or employment?
  • Trade is an important point of focus in today’s international economy. This video presents facts and statistics from OECD’s most recent publications on this topic.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at .
  • Visit the OECD Gender Data Portal. Selected indicators shedding light on gender inequalities in education, employment and entrepreneurship.

Most Popular Articles

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2019